Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Ford Transit Connect Xlt Mini Passenger Van 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars

Year:2010 Mileage:68255 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Nottingham, Maryland, United States

Nottingham, Maryland, United States
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:2.0L 121Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: NM0KS9BN9AT022933 Year: 2010
Make: Ford
Model: Transit Connect
Mileage: 68,255
Trim: XLT Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

All our vehicles are Maryland State Inspected and come with a Carfax History Report. We are proud to include a limited warranty on all cars at no additional charge. Internet pricing is based upon qualified credit, but we do welcome all types, including those with slow payments, bad debts, even prior repos and bankruptcies, discharged or open. Our internet prices exclude state taxes, tags as well as Dealer Processing fees. National Motors has been selling vehicles to the Baltimore community for over 16 years and the reason for that is that we believe in great customer service.

Auto Services in Maryland

Wiygul Automotive Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 630 Grant St, Potomac
Phone: (703) 435-3000

Ware It`s At Custom Auto Refinishing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 206 Banjo Ln Ste B, Wye-Mills
Phone: (855) 407-0292

Vehicle Outfitter ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5625 Baltimore National Pike, Catonsville
Phone: (410) 744-7181

Tire World ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 5702 Industry Lane, Frederick MD, 21704, Point-Of-Rocks
Phone: (301) 698-9200

T & D Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 328 Beards Hill Rd, Fallston
Phone: (410) 297-8400

S A Best Tires Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 4405 Belair Rd, Kingsville
Phone: (410) 325-2077

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Motor Trend pits Camaro 1LE vs Mustang with Performance Pack, surprises ensue

Thu, 16 Oct 2014

With the 2015 Ford Mustang firmly on the scene, the inevitable comparisons with its arch rival, the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro are just starting to trickle out. Over the next several months, you're likely to be inundated by every outlet's muscle car comparison, whether it be the turbocharged Ford against the V6 Chevy, a V8-powered convertible comparo or what we have here, a competition between each vehicle's performance upgrade.
Motor Trend has pitted the Camaro SS 1LE against a Mustang with the GT Performance Pack for a comprehensive series of comparisons on the test stage, street and finally, at Willow Springs with ace Randy Pobst behind the wheel. As per usual, we aren't about to spoil this one for you.
So, hit the play button, have a look and then let us know what you think in Comments.

European car sales up 8% in February

Sat, 22 Mar 2014

Three weeks ago an analyst increased projections for European car sales this year, expecting them to climb three percent compared to last year instead of 2.7 percent. That number is a postive sign after years of hard times but it turns out February was especially good, overall European sales climbing eight percent on a wave of southern European recovery and discounts - and this comes after five months of gains including January's 7.2-percent jump over the year before.
The only country of Europe's five largest markets to post a decline was France, just as it did in January, Germany, the UK and Italy posting solid double-digit numbers, Spain rocking the charts with an 18-percent increase because of a government program to encourage trade-ins.
The only brand to miss the wave was Volkswagen, dropping 0.8 percent as it watched the double-digit growth at sister brands Audi, Seat and Skoda lift the Volkswagen Group sales up by seven-percent. Peugeot overcame flat sales at Citroën to improve the group by 3.5 percent, BMW and the Mercedes-Benz/Smart combo rose by four percent, the Fiat group jumped 5.8 percent, Ford was up 11 percent, the Renault Group 11.5 percent, General Motors 12 percent and the Toyota clan by 14 percent.