Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford Thunderbird Sportster Convertible on 2040-cars

US $67,995.00
Year:1962 Mileage:54987 Color: Red /
 Red
Location:

Bristol, Pennsylvania, United States

Bristol, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:8
Fuel Type:Gas
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

New

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 2Y89Z147986
Year: 1962
Make: Ford
Model: Thunderbird
Mileage: 54,987
Sub Model: Convertible
Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Red
Drivetrain: Rear Wheel Drive
Interior Color: Red

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Zalac Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Towing
Address: 590 East Main St., Vanderbilt
Phone: (724) 912-3887

Young`s Auto Transit ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Towing
Address: 2510 Spring Garden Ave, Fredericktown
Phone: (412) 999-2605

Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Auto Transmission
Address: 47 E Crafton Ave, Boston
Phone: (412) 212-6144

Used Cars ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: RR 2, Mount-Penn
Phone: (610) 926-1121

Tri State Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 27 Hanna St, Amity
Phone: (724) 225-8513

Trail Automotive Group ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: North-Wales
Phone: (215) 412-0700

Auto blog

Leno chooses his top 10 Mustangs

Sat, 14 Jun 2014

He may be a few months late to the party, but in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Ford Mustang, Jay Leno has delivered a short video in which he runs down which of the Blue Oval's pony cars from the past 50 years are his favorites.
The list is pretty darn similar to our own, with some of the big names from the Mustang's half century making an appearance, while there are three or four cars here that we think you'll be pretty surprised by.
Take a look below for this short video from Jay Leno's Garage.

Ford, Toyota clean up in Best Car For The Money Awards

Fri, 22 Feb 2013

The U.S. News Best Cars for the Money Awards picks winners by looking at the average transaction price, five-year total cost of ownership, the regard a car has from the automotive press, reliability figures from J.D. Power and Associates and safety data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The result, according to the magazine, is "the best combination of critical acclaim and long-term value."
Ford nabbed six of the 21 categories that received awards this year, the Focus, Fusion, Fusion Hybrid, Taurus, Escape and Edge getting trophies. Toyota and its Lexus and Scion sub-brands took another five, the Tacoma and Tundra owning the two categories given to pickup trucks. The other ten awards were split between Honda with three, Buick with two, and one each for Subaru, BMW, Hyundai, Chevrolet and Mazda.
Follow the link to see all the winners and read about why they were chosen.

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.