Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1965 Thunderbird Convertible on 2040-cars

US $16,000.00
Year:1965 Mileage:58000 Color: Chantilly Beige Metallic /
 Lt brown
Location:

Roundup, Montana, United States

Roundup, Montana, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Convertible
Engine:390 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 5Y85Z137297 Year: 1965
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Thunderbird
Trim: Convertible
Drive Type: automatic
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
Mileage: 58,000
Exterior Color: Chantilly Beige Metallic
Interior Color: Lt brown
Warranty: none
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Montana

Tire-Rama ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 340 W Pine St, Missoula
Phone: (406) 543-8341

Ted`s Towing, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Towing
Address: 1279 Skeels St, Birney
Phone: (307) 672-5382

S & D Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 4201 2nd Ave N, Tracy
Phone: (406) 205-2554

Novus Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1500 Mt Highway 91 N, Dillon
Phone: (406) 683-2846

Lincoln Auto Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: PO Box 33, Ovando
Phone: (406) 362-4749

High Plains Motors, Inc. ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 331 Front St, Wolf-Point
Phone: (406) 653-1310

Auto blog

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.

Ford Shelby GT350 Mustang is a track-day weapon with 500 hp

Mon, 17 Nov 2014



Ford promises more than 500 horsepower and a torque peak above 400 lb-ft.
The wait is finally over. After months of spy shots, rumor and innuendo, Ford has officially pulled the wraps off its new Shelby GT350. Judging by the spec sheet and the promises being made - especially that the Shelby GT350 will be "an all-day track car that's also street legal" - the wait appears to have been worth it.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.