Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Taurus Se Sedan 4-door 3.5l 10 11 12 14 on 2040-cars

Year:2013 Mileage:5569
Location:

Lorain, Ohio, United States

Lorain, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

2013 Ford Taurus SE I bought this car from an insurance co. with light left side damage..both left side doors were replaced. Very light damage.this vehicle was inspected by the state..it passed all state required inspections..this car runs and drives perfect..i only accept cash in person or bank wire transfer.any questions please call 440-326-1070..this car only has 5,569.miles.I'ts  like new no issues..high bidder will be happy, air  bags did not deploy..fly in and drive home.  Buyer is responsible for shipping.

Auto Services in Ohio

World Import Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2337 26th St NE, Maximo
Phone: (330) 456-3535

Westerville Auto Group ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5309 Westerville RD, Norwich
Phone: (614) 882-4551

W & W Auto Tech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 5005 Acme Dr # A, Indian-Springs
Phone: (513) 860-9928

Vendetta Towing Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Scrap Metals, Junk Dealers
Address: 275-299 N. Arlington St, Copley
Phone: (330) 752-2886

Van`s Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: Garrettsville

Tri County Tire Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 7511 Jerusalem Rd, Oregon
Phone: (419) 836-7788

Auto blog

2015 Ford Edge debuts with fresh tech inside and out

Tue, 24 Jun 2014



Edge will be the first Ford-badged product to come standard with EcoBoost power.
Ford officially unveiled the all-new, third-generation Edge today at its Dearborn home, announcing that the latest version of the popular crossover will ride on the same CD4 architecture that underpins the Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ. The Edge will also be the first Ford-badged product to come standard with EcoBoost power.

Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]

Mon, 22 Jul 2013

Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.