Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Ford Ranger on 2040-cars

US $13,995.00
Year:2009 Mileage:80976 Color: Oxford White
Location:

2385 US-501, Conway, South Carolina, United States

2385 US-501, Conway, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.3L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Manual
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTYR10D29PA15976
Stock Num: P2601
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Year: 2009
Exterior Color: Oxford White
Options:
  • 2 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • Center Console: Partial with storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Diameter of tires: 15.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 39.2"
  • Front Hip Room: 52.7"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 54.5"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 21 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 26 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual driver mirror adjustment
  • Manual passenger mirror adjustment
  • Overall height: 66.2"
  • Overall Width: 69.4"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Power steering
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 70
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 225 mm
  • Trailer hitch
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 15
  • Wheel Width: 7
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 80976

Outstanding design defines the 2009 Ford Ranger! A durable pickup truck seating as many as 3 occupants with ease! Ford infused the interior with top shelf amenities, such as: a rear step bumper, a front bench seat, and much more. Our experienced sales staff is eager to share its knowledge and enthusiasm with you. They'll work with you to find the right vehicle at a price you can afford. We are here to help you.

Auto Services in South Carolina

University Tire and Muffler ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 8747 University Blvd, Summerville
Phone: (843) 863-8801

Tint Plus of Anderson ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Industrial Equipment & Supplies
Address: 5703 Highway 76, Sandy-Springs
Phone: (864) 231-8493

Sterling`s Detail ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing, Car Wash
Address: Lane
Phone: (843) 216-8666

Southern Customs Body Paint Frame & Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 1901 S 5th St, Lydia
Phone: (843) 383-3878

Southern Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 608 N Polk St, Tega-Cay
Phone: (704) 889-5289

Sisk Family Ford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 565 Oak St, Chesnee
Phone: (828) 245-1626

Auto blog

Ford Focus ST diesel estate in track showdown with Focus ST hatch

Sun, Jan 18 2015

Diesel hot hatches are still a concept that's gaining ground. Obviously, there are none for sale in the US, but European buyers have the choice of at least the Volkswagen Golf GTD and Ford Focus ST Diesel. What better way to find out how the new, high-performance oil-burner really stacks up than for Ford to stage a race against the gasoline-fueled Focus ST? On paper, the ST Diesel is at a big performance detriment here. Its 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder makes 182 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque compared to 247 hp and 266 lb-ft for the gas version in this race. However while not a factor for this race, the oil-burner does offer better fuel economy and produces less CO2, which makes a difference for European buyers. Ford skews the race results by giving the ST Diesel Estate a two-second head start for this one-lap battle around the Castle Combe Circuit. Also, this is a video from the Blue Oval, which is going to further minimize the appearance of weakness for its vehicles. Still, both STs really get to show off their strengths, and it's worth seeing how the sibling rivalry shakes out at the finish line.

2014 Ford Fiesta ST

Tue, 15 Oct 2013

I'm not overly inclined to professional jealousy, as a rule. Sure, I go a bit green around the eyes when Ramsey draws the 911 GT3 trip to Weissach, Harley is tapped-in to drive a completely stunning Porsche 911 by Singer, or, you know, Drew Phillips gets to shoot a Lamborghini Veneno in the middle of a desert like some sort of sheik. I hate you guys...
Honestly though, one of the new car events that dug me the most, was when our Steven J. Ewing got to fling the Ford Fiesta ST around some hot corner of Europe. What goes around comes around, I suppose, as Mr. Ewing himself espoused an envious nature of the Focus ST trip that came before.
The good news in all this covetous intra-office behavior? All the cars mentioned, and specifically the Fiesta ST, are just wonderful to drive. I can say that with more confidence than ever now, having joined Ford for a good bit of Fiesta-flinging myself. In my case, the locale was slightly more pedestrian (Michigan not Portugal), and the car in question was the five-door version of the Fiesta ST that we get here in The States, as opposed to the three-door number they get across the pond.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.