Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford Ranger on 2040-cars

Year:2000 Mileage:172776
Location:

8983 Ocean Hwy, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, United States

8983 Ocean Hwy, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:3.0L V6 12V MPFI OHV Flexible Fuel
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTYR14V6YPA63479
Stock Num: 1626A
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Year: 2000
Options:
  • 2 Door
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Center Console: Partial with storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Curb weight: 3,210 lbs.
  • Diameter of tires: 15.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 39.2"
  • Front Hip Room: 52.7"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.2"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 53.8"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 19.5 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 22 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 27 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 4,760 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual driver mirror adjustment
  • Manual passenger mirror adjustment
  • Overall height: 64.8"
  • Overall Length: 202.9"
  • Overall Width: 69.4"
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Power steering
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 35.6"
  • Rear Hip Room: 19.8"
  • Rear jump seat
  • Rear Leg Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 15.3"
  • Rear wheel ABS Brakes
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 70
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 225 mm
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheel Diameter: 15
  • Wheelbase: 125.7"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 172776

Auto Services in South Carolina

Winn`s Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 415 Batesburg Hwy, Saluda
Phone: (864) 445-9466

Watson Imports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 13817 E Wade Hampton Blvd, Travelers-Rest
Phone: (864) 848-0110

Vintage Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 605 Pine Knoll Dr, Greenville
Phone: (864) 292-8785

Twin Lakes Auto Body & RV Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service
Address: 656 Twin Lakes Rd Seneca, Richland
Phone: (864) 972-7830

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 108 Chalmers Rd, Powdersville
Phone: (864) 277-6866

Tim`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 109 Shepherd St, Tega-Cay
Phone: (704) 824-8269

Auto blog

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

These horribly misguided front-drive design studies nearly became the Mustang

Fri, 08 Nov 2013

As we eagerly await the unveiling of the all-new sixth-generation Mustang, Ford has been giving us some great information over the past few months showing what has gone into shaping its venerable pony car. As many changes as the Mustang has gone through in its 50 years, though, it appears the fourth-gen model played a decisive and pivotal role in the car's future.
As is part of Mustang lore, the front-wheel drive Ford Probe was originally developed as a next-generation Mustang in the Eighties before cooler heads prevailed. The Blue Oval has just released a handful of images showing how bad things could have been - including a full-scale clay model of a front-wheel-drive Mustang (shown above). Fortunately, the FWD Mustang plan was scrapped and Ford went to work designing a rear-wheel-drive replacement for the Fox Body Mustang, with three design studies making it far enough to become full-scale models. These include the soft "Bruce Jenner" Mustang, the over-the-top "Rambo" Mustang and the middle-ground "Arnold Schwarzenegger" Mustang, which finally became the basis for the 1994 'Stang.
By early 1991, the design language of the fourth-generation Mustang had been worked out, and the rest, they say, is history. Scroll down for the fascinating press release telling the story of the fourth-gen Mustang, and be sure to check out the gallery of horribly misguided sketches and various design studies that were all on the table in the late 1980s.

2013 Shelby 1000 unleashes its 1,200 horsepower ahead of NY show reveal

Fri, 22 Mar 2013

True story: Last fall, I had the opportunity to spend a week with Ford's new 2013 Shelby GT500 - the Blue Oval's factory Mustang with 662 horsepower and 631 pound-feet of torque. It's an amazing beast, to be sure. I'm not sure if it was Michigan's damp streets strewn with potholes and wet leaves, but at no point did I ever say to myself, "You know, Ford is on to a really good thing here, but what it really needs is about twice the power." And yet, for people in warmer climes with infrastructure in better nick - or for those whose muscle cars live their lives out on the track, there's apparently sufficient demand to warrant just such a beast.
Quick studies will recall that Shelby American launched its 1000 last year to commemorate its 50th anniversary, but it is returning to the New York Auto Show with a fresh version based on the 2013 GT500 I drove. The 2013 Shelby 1000 whips up 1,200 horsepower on pump gas thanks to beefed-up forced induction, engine internals and cooling. Wisely, it also incorporates an adjustable suspension and big brake package to make sure those ponies have the best chance being safely deployed to the ground.
What price the world's most powerful "production" muscle car? $154,995 for starters - donor GT500 not included. What, no convertible variant?