THIS IS A 1983 FORD RANGER WAS DRIVEN BY MY BROTHER INLAW STILL HAS TAGS HE PASSED AWAY AND WE ARE SELLING FROM THE ESTATE HE MOSTLY DROVE TO AREA STORES AND THE LAND FILL AND ERRANDS MOTOR AND TRANSMISSION WORK WELL. OUTSIDE HAS SOME RUST AS YOU CAN SEE. INSIDE IS OK I AM SELLING AS IS WITH NO QURANTEE OF ANY KIND. AS YOU CAN SEE IT WAS READY TO MAKE A TRIP TO THE LANDFILL I WILL TAKE THERE AND UNLOAD. I WILL TELL YOU THAT HE TOLD US SEVERAL WEEKS AGO THAT IT RAN GOOD BUT IT WOULD GET UP TO ABOUT 40 MPH AND WOULD NOT WANT TO GO FASTER SOMEONE SAID IT WAS PROBABLY A FILTER CLOGGED UP. I WILL SAY HE PUT OVER $1000 IN PARTS A COUPLE YEARS AGO BEING A 1983 YOU CAN PUT HISTORIC TAGS ON IT AND IN MD IT NEEDS NO INSPECTION OR EMMISIONS TEST. IT HAS A AM/FM AND MAYBE A CASSETTE I CAN'T REMEMBER. I PUT DOWN 99000 MILES BUT I BELIEVE IT IS LESS I WILL CHECK. IF YOUR FROM MD YOU CAN GET TAGS FROM MY BROTHERS SERVICE CENTER AND DRIVE AWAY AS LONG AS YOU HAVE INS. HE ALSO CHANGED OIL ON TIME AND WOULD TAKE CARE OF ANY PROBLEMS. MUST BE PAID THROUGH PAYPAL BEFORE PICKUP THAT WAY YOU CAN GET AT ANY TIME UP TO 60 DAYS. YOU WILL HAVE 48 HRS TO PAY IN FULL. I DO NOT KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY SMALL LEAKS BUT I KNOW HE DROVE IT UNTILL HE PASSED AWAY. SO WE ARE STARTING AT JUNK PRICE BUT I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE ASHAME BECAUSE IT IS STILL A DECENT LITTLE TRUCK. |
Ford Ranger for Sale
1998 ford ranger xlt extended cab pickup 2-door 4.0l(US $3,000.00)
1998 ford ranger ev electric vehicle rangerev(US $3,950.00)
Sport 4.0l cd 4.0l sohc v6 engine (std) 5-speed automatic transmission w/od a/c(US $17,288.00)
1996 ford ranger xlt great work truck! no reserve
2000 ford ranger xl extended cab pickup 2-door 3.0l
2008 ford ranger pickup 2-door service truck ladder rack cargo van ford(US $7,899.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Weiland`s Upholstering Company Incorporated ★★★★★
Two Guys Collision Ctr ★★★★★
Top Gun Collision Repair ★★★★★
Thrifty Auto Repair ★★★★★
Reisterstown Auto Body ★★★★★
Reg Dixon`s Service Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Weekly Recap: Toyota, Mazda team up to 'make cars better'
Sat, May 16 2015Toyota and Mazda are teaming for a noble purpose: to "make cars better." That's how the two Japanese automakers termed their partnership, which was announced this week. So what does this actually mean? The companies said they will set up a joint committee to look for areas of cooperation and named safety and the environment as issues they plan to tackle. From a product perspective, it's believed that Toyota is interested in Mazda's Skyactive engine portfolio. In turn, Mazda has its eye on Toyota's fuel-cell and plug-in hybrid technology. While more specifics were not confirmed, the companies said the "agreement will go beyond the traditional framework of cooperation," and it has the potential to be a long-range partnership. "The main purpose of this initiative is to enhance the appeal of our cars," Toyota president Akio Toyoda said at the announcement. Previously, Mazda has licensed Toyota's hybrid tech and assembled compact cars for Toyota in Mexico. Akio Toyoda said these projects "triggered" the automakers to explore further collaboration. Dave Sullivan, product analysis manager for AutoPacific, said the tie-up echoes Daimler's wide-ranging work with the Renault-Nissan alliance. "This could be a well-groomed match due to each having very unique skill sets," he said. OTHER NEWS & NOTES Volvo selects South Carolina for US factory Volvo confirmed this week that it will build its first US factory in South Carolina, with construction set to begin this fall. The company first revealed plans in March, though it didn't announce a site. The plant will have initial annual production of 100,000 units, though the vehicle or vehicles to be assembled were not specified. The factory, located near Charleston, will open in 2018 and ultimately employ 4,000 people. The facility will help Volvo continue its growth strategy, which includes strengthening its presence in the US market, where it wants to sell more than 100,000 cars per year. "Building a plant in the US is a reflection of Volvo Cars' commitment to the US and the key role the US plays in our growth objectives," Lex Kerssemakers, senior vice president, Americas, said in a statement. Ford GT spied on the road The 2017 Ford GT was spotted testing around the Blue Oval's headquarters in Dearborn, MI, this week. The raw body panels were exposed, and they lacked paint or camouflage. It's the first time the GT has been captured on the street after a spring of auto show reveals.
Gladiators, Pilots, and Palisades, plus a couple boring crossovers | Autoblog Podcast #562
Mon, Nov 19 2018On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski. The duo discuss the leaked Jeep Gladiator, Ford's Baby Bronco, the Aston Martin DBX, and then touch on other reborn names like the Honda Pilot. They also discuss how boring crossovers have taken over as the family car of choice in the United States and debate the merits of turbocharged V6 engines versus the classic American V8. Finally, we spend your money.Autoblog Podcast #562 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Jeep Gladiator leaked Hyundai Palisade and Honda Pilot teased Aston Martin DBX Ford Baby Bronco leaked Boring crossovers Ford F-150 2.7-liter EcoBoost Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Podcasts LA Auto Show Aston Martin Ford GMC Honda Hyundai Jeep Truck Crossover SUV honda pilot jeep gladiator aston martin dbx hyundai palisade ford baby bronco