Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1972 Ford Ranchero 429 Matching Numbers Rust Free Nevada Car 2 Owner Classic on 2040-cars

US $7,500.00
Year:1972 Mileage:125000 Color: Teal /
 Black with Teal Accents
Location:

Sparks, Nevada, United States

Sparks, Nevada, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:429 Big Block Matching Numbers Car
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1972
Interior Color: Black with Teal Accents
Model: Ranchero
Trim: 500XL 429
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 125,000
Exterior Color: Teal
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a beautiful 1972 Ford Ranchero with the big block 429. Matching numbers vehicle! Only two owners. Rust free Nevada car. 125,000 original miles

The custom teal paint job cost $6000 at the time. There are some blemishes now, and some bondo that is cracking in the driver's door. It is not a show car, but looks great. It turns heads and people give you the thumbs up when you drive by. The upholstery is also custom and is color-keyed to match the paint. The dash has been dialed in with the paint as well, as is shown in the pictures. The Ranchero is complemented with a great set of custom wheels, and a tonneau cover that tops the bed that is in great shape. There is a fantastic sound system! It has an Alpine CD changer with a Hifonics 200 watt amp. There are four kicker eight inch sub woofers and two Boston Pro Series mid range speakers with tweeters. The woofers are cleverly stashed behind the seats with vinyl covers.

The meticulous owner kept all of the stock parts if someone wanted to take it back to bone stock. The original wheels with BFG's are also included. We also have the stock valve covers and air cleaner. 

The Ranchero was stored inside for the past fifteen years. The Ranchero has been detailed. We installed new spark plug wires, new battery, changed the oil and all filters. rebuilt the Edlebrock 750 carb. We have run a tank of premium fuel through it, and had a blast watching the peoples' heads turn as we drove by. The engine was rebuilt 3000 miles ago. This is one fine car that is worth taking a look at. It is eligible for Hot August Nights in Reno. It is a great cruiser. It is low, but not slow.

The Ranchero is currently in Reno.  We will help with the shipping, or can deliver a reasonable distance for a reasonable price.

Auto Services in Nevada

Towbin Dodge ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 275 Auto Mall Dr, North-Las-Vegas
Phone: (702) 558-3800

Tire Works Total Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1925 N Hollywood Blvd, North-Las-Vegas
Phone: (702) 649-9400

Studio Tint ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Industrial Equipment & Supplies
Address: Nellis-Afb
Phone: (702) 360-8468

Sierra Car Care & MST Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Brake Repair
Address: Jarbidge
Phone: (775) 583-4291

Schreier Specialties, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 870 Steneri Way #103, Sun-Valley
Phone: (775) 856-1144

Rod`s Transmission ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission, Automobile Accessories
Address: 472-675 Johnstonville Rd Ste N, Empire
Phone: (530) 257-3209

Auto blog

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

Jay Leno's Garage goes eco with Ricardo HyBoost

Mon, 17 Mar 2014

"Now before you turn away, this is not another boring hybrid car thing..." Despite the slightly defensive introduction from Jay, the latest episode of Jay Leno's Garage is actually pretty fascinating. The Ricardo HyBoost is a 2009 Ford Focus that has had a 1.1-liter engine swapped in for the stock 2.0-liter four. That might not get you performance enthusiasts out there fired up, until, that is, you hear that the 1.1L is also fed by both a turbocharger and an electrically driven supercharger for an instant-on "torque-fill" effect. Sounds about right, considering that Ricardo engineering is part of the genius behind the McLaren P1.
Perhaps most exciting of all, the Ricardo folks say that the package should run somewhere in the neighborhood of $1,100. A sort of performance-hybrid that makes sense for the frugal driver and the enthusiast one, then. There's a lot more to the HyBoost, all of which can be seen in the video below.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.