1968 Ford Mustang on 2040-cars
Delmont, Pennsylvania, United States
1968 ford mustang fastback frame up restoration that I completed 3 years ago . I went with the Shelby clone theme
and with a dark silver bmw color that makes the car stand out everywhere ( but I always hear is that Eleanor ). I
built this car for my wife but it never leaves the shop unless I take it out so that explains why it only has 2264
miles on it . as you can see from the pictures just about every piece on metal was replaced on this car and while I
was at it I put complete frame rails under the car which everybody knows mustangs did not have . the car has 4
wheel power disc brakes and the rear is a heavy duty 8 inch 325 posi with lowered heavy duty leaf springs and gas
shocks .the front end is a mustang two with power rack and pinion and tubular a arms with 2 inch lowering spindles
and gas shocks with a sway bar . American racing wheels that you never see and 17 inch up front and 18 in the rear.
the engine is a 435 horse 550 ft lb 465 big block ford with a wide ratio 4 speed and a 750 holley LOTS OF POWER AND
TOURQUE. the car runs and handles great . the interior is mostly stock black with the fold down rear seat and the
functioning trap door to the trunk but I did install a custom console and it has blue tooth and usb also.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 1967 ford mustang s code 390 gt 4 speed(US $16,170.00)
- 1966 ford mustang(US $15,400.00)
- 1970 ford mustang mach 1(US $15,400.00)
- 1969 ford mustang(US $23,800.00)
- 1966 ford mustang convertible(US $15,400.00)
- 1968 ford mustang r code 428 cobra jet 4 speed(US $18,830.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Wayne Carl Garage ★★★★★
Union Fuel Co ★★★★★
Tint It Is Incorporated ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Syrena International Ltd ★★★★★
Auto blog
STUDY: Ford owns brand loyalty in 2009; Scorned Saturn, Pontiac buyers will look outside of GM
Fri, 16 Oct 2009Ford buyers appear to love their cars more than customers of any other automotive brand, returning back to the American automaker when it comes time to purchase their next vehicle. According to a study by Experian Automotive, six of the top 10 vehicles for customer brand loyalty wear badges from the Blue Oval. That includes the Ford Fusion (62.4 percent), Ford Edge (57.9 percent), Ford Five Hundred/Taurus (56 percent), Ford Freestyle (51.9 percent), Ford Escape (49.4 percent) and the Ford Focus (47.57 percent).
Other vehicles making up the top 10 include the Toyota Prius (52 percent), Chevy Impala (51.7 percent), Toyota Camry (47.8 percent) and Toyota Corolla (47.56 percent). This brings up an interesting question: With the closing of automotive brands like Saturn and Pontiac, where are those buyers to turn for their next automotive purchase?
Apparently, not back to General Motors. According to Experian, Pontiac owners are most likely to look to the Ford lineup for their next car or truck and Saturn shoppers will switch to Toyota or Honda - not particularly surprising given that Saturn was meant to compete with import brands. Experian predicts that GM's overall market share will fall from 20 percent to about 17.5 percent, with most of the slack being picked up by Ford, Honda and Toyota.
NHTSA investigating 725k Ford, Mercury vehicles for stalling issue
Mon, 25 Feb 2013Owners of Ford Escape, Mercury Mariner, Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan models, listen up. According to a report on Automotive News, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into these four vehicles totaling an estimated 725,000 units. The investigation appears to center around a malfunctioning throttle body on non-hybrid models of the 2005-2012 Escape and 2011-2012 Fusion. With Mercury dying off after the 2011 model year, this probe will also apply to the 2005 through 2011 Mariner and the 2011 Milan. There has been some discussion around the Escape stalling issue for some time now, but this investigation appears to be larger in scope than before.
Though not a recall yet, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received 123 complaints of stalling or surging vehicles, while Ford itself has logged 1,472 complaints. The investigation report, which is posted below, seems to indicate that a faulty circuit board for the throttle body could cause the vehicle to go into limp mode, which, according to NHTSA, could cause complaints of both stalling and surging.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.