Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Ford Mercury Galaxie Ltd 23050 Miles on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:23050 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Carver, Massachusetts, United States

Carver, Massachusetts, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:390 2v
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 9P62Y147361 Year: 1969
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Galaxie
Trim: LTD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 23,050
Exterior Color: Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1969 Ford  GALAXIE  LTD ,,ALL ORIGINAL 23050 MILES,DRESDEN BLUE W\/BLACK VINAL ROOF,,,,,,2 door,, BIG BLOCK 390 2BB,,,,,BROUGHAM INTERIA,,,, COLD AC,,,,,POWER FACTORY TINTED WINDOWS,,,,,POWER 6 WAY SEAT,,,,POWER FRONT DISK BRAKES,,,,POWER STEARING,,,,TILT WHEEL AND POWER DOOR LOCKS... 1 of 1 PER ELITE MARTI REPORT,,,NEW FLOW MASTER DUEL EXHAUST ..PLEASE CALL MARK 508-789-4155        
 
youtude links  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16KlJ6Sexd4

youtube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wMO1pHBjZw

TRY THIS ONE  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q31VmP8PfLI

CAR IS SOLD AS IS WITH NO WARRENTY.... WILL WORK WITH SHIPPING COMPANY,,BUYER RESPONSABLE FOR SHIPPING COST .....CAR IS FOR SALE LOCALY TOO

superflix video http://studio.stupeflix.com/v/kR2WPKpOuG/?share=1

Last time i listed the car I had a long history of the car,what parts were replaced ,what was updated ......any questions about history please call or use  Ask seller a question..

ANY QUESTIONS CALL MARK 508 789 4155

Auto Services in Massachusetts

VIP Parts, Tires & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 275 Arsenal St, Somerville
Phone: (617) 924-8700

Symphony Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 221 Hancock St, South-Weymouth
Phone: (617) 436-4478

Stoughton Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 931 Washington St, Hyde-Park
Phone: (781) 344-0648

Sonny`s Glass Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: Chelmsford
Phone: (877) 712-3647

Scott`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 16 Cushman St, Raynham
Phone: (508) 947-5510

Samuels Jaguar Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 296 N Beacon St, Glendale
Phone: (617) 787-1187

Auto blog

Ford recalling 126,000 Fusions and Milans over wheel separation concern

Fri, 09 Dec 2011

Ford has announced a recall of certain Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles after an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. A total of 128,616 2010 and 2011 models equipped with steel wheels may have been manufactured with wheel studs that could crack and split over time. If that happens, the vehicle may experience a wheel separation.
According to The Detroit News, the company is aware of a total of 30 wheel separation incidents, one of which occurred on the front of the vehicle. Even so, no injuries have been reported as a result of the defect.
The problem apparently stems from the fact that the mounting pads on the vehicles' steel wheels may have been faulty from the factory. In addition, the wheel mounting face on rear disc brakes may not have been installed properly. Ford will inspect the rear disc face and replace them as necessary. In addition, the company will replace all of the vehicle's wheel studs free of charge. Head to the NHTSA website for more information, and click past the jump to view the full recall notice.

Editors' Picks March 2021 | Ford Mustang Mach-E, Polestar 2, Land Rover Defender and more

Thu, Apr 8 2021

The month of March was unofficial minivan month here at Autoblog. We drove all of them but the Kia Carnival, but don’t worry, you wonÂ’t have to wait much longer to read that review. Among all the family-toting machines, we drove some more exciting vehicles including the Land Rover Defender and a pair of up-and-coming EVs. It was a month of excellent cars, meaning that this monthÂ’s litter of EditorsÂ’ Picks is stacked. In case you missed FebruaryÂ’s picks, hereÂ’s a quick refresher on whatÂ’s going on here. We rate all the new cars we drive with a 1-10 score. Cars that are exemplary or stand out in their respective segments get EditorsÂ’ Pick status. Those are the ones weÂ’d recommend to our friends, family and anybody whoÂ’s curious and asks the question. The list that youÂ’ll find below consists of every car we rated in March that earned the honor of being an EditorsÂ’ Pick. 2021 Ford Bronco Sport 2021 Ford Bronco Sport First Edition View 32 Photos Quick take: Ford's baby Bronco is an authentic foil to the big Bronco 2-Door and 4-Door. It brings rugged styling, better-than-average off-road capability and thoughtful utility features to a generic segment of cars. Score: 8 What it competes with: Jeep Compass, Jeep Cherokee, Mazda CX-30, Subaru Crosstrek, Kia Seltos, Chevrolet Trailblazer Pros: Stellar design, excellent off-road, clever interior details throughout Cons: Pricier than most, average transmission, underwhelming interior quality and ambiance in lowest trims From the editors: Road Test Editor Zac Palmer — “I genuinely enjoy driving this cute crossover. It feels like a mini truck on the road, and Ford admirably translated the design from its big Bronco over to this Escape-based crossover. News Editor Joel Stocksdale — "The Bronco Sport isn't perfect, the transmission could use some work, and it's a little bumpy, but it's a characterful little thing with loads of style, great visibility and space, and impressive capabilities on and off road in the powerful Badlands form." In-depth analysis: 2021 Ford Bronco Sport Review | Bronco for the masses   2021 Land Rover Defender 2021 Land Rover Defender 110 View 64 Photos Quick take: The Land Rover Defender provides everything you'd hope for in a modern Land Rover: superlative off-road capability, surprisingly plush on-road demeanor, abundant interior space and abundant character. The base four-cylinder is likely all you'll need and lower trim levels provide more than enough equipment.

Ford fights back against patent trolls

Fri, Feb 13 2015

Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.