2009 Ford Fusion Sel on 2040-cars
9024 Colerain Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Engine:2.3L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FAHP08Z89R101694
Stock Num: C70312MP
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion SEL
Year: 2009
Exterior Color: Silver
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 125189
Fusion SEL, Duratec 2.3L I4, 5-Speed Automatic with Overdrive, Air Conditioning, CD player, Four wheel independent suspension, and Split folding rear seat. McCluskey Chevrolet's Free Lifetime Mechanical Protection. Who could say no to a simply great car like this gorgeous 2009 Ford Fusion? Some manufacturers cut corners to save money, but Ford didn't try to shave off a single penny when building this excellent Fusion. New Car Test Drive called it ...rock solid entry at a decent price. It handles well, looks purposeful and delivers good value for the money... J.D. Power and Associates gave the 2009 Fusion 4.5 out of 5 Power Circles for Overall Initial Quality.
Ford Fusion for Sale
2012 ford fusion se(US $16,733.00)
2012 ford fusion sport(US $20,933.00)
2014 ford fusion se
2011 ford fusion sel(US $18,750.00)
2014 ford fusion se(US $28,380.00)
2014 ford fusion s(US $22,199.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Weber Road Auto Service ★★★★★
Twinsburg Brake & Tire ★★★★★
Trost`s Service ★★★★★
TransColonial Auto Service ★★★★★
Top Tech Auto ★★★★★
Tire Discounters ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM details CEO Mary Barra's pay, contacts with investor David Einhorn
Wed, Apr 5 2017Earnings/Financials Chrysler Ford GM Sergio Marchionne Mary Barra Mark Fields david einhorn greenlight capital
Watch the Hennessey Ford GT makes its record run at Texas Mile
Wed, 27 Mar 2013We said they'd probably be out with an official video, we did not lie. The Hennessey-powered camouflage Ford GT sat at one end of the runway at the Texas Mile sitting still. At the other end of the runway it had broken its own speed record, the twin-turbo 5.7-liter V8 pushing the aerodynamic supercar up to 267.6 miles per hour, a 4.3-mph improvement over the old mark.
There's not much in the video you haven't already seen, this just makes it official. That said, who doesn't want to see a twin-turbo Ford GT set an incredible speed record? You can watch it below.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study