Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

75 Mile, Late Build 2005 Ford Gt Wiht All 4 Options! on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:75 Color: Mark IV Red with White Stripes /
 Ebony Black Leather
Location:

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Springfield, Missouri, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:5.4L 5409CC 330Cu. In. V8 GAS DOHC Supercharged
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 1FAFP90S75Y401670 Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: GT
Number of Doors: 2
Trim: Base Coupe 2-Door
Mileage: 75
Exterior Color: Mark IV Red with White Stripes
Drive Type: RWD
Interior Color: Ebony Black Leather
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Unspecified
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Ford Ford GT for Sale

Auto Services in Missouri

Xpert Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2818 Forest Ridge Ln, Westphalia
Phone: (573) 638-2666

Wrench Teach GV ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 315 S Main St, Grain-Valley
Phone: (816) 847-7117

Twin City Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 301 Autumn Ridge Dr, Mapaville
Phone: (636) 931-0555

Trux Unlimited Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 1015 S Bethany St, Sugar-Creek
Phone: (816) 463-9907

The Tint Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 53 Norwood Trailer Ct, Washington
Phone: (636) 390-8828

The Automotive Shop of Melbourne ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1152 E Main St, Jefferson-Cty
Phone: (870) 368-3133

Auto blog

Ford Fiesta ST GRC Racecar is hungry for podiums in 2013

Thu, 07 Feb 2013

As we reported earlier, the Chicago showing of this plucky Ford Fiesta ST GRC racer points to bigger and brighter days for Global RallyCross. For the upcoming season, you can expect to see Ken Block and Tanner Foust both driving the Ford racecar, and if last season's results are any indication, you can anticipate quite a few podium appearances, as well.
The Fiesta seen here was built by the Swedes at OlsbergsMSE, and will be driven in anger by Foust in 2013. Modifications are, as you'd expect, extensive, and include an engine, exhaust and braking upgrades, a racing style short-throw shifter and a limited-slip differential. As you can see, the car has been fully stripped out and caged for maximum speed and safety, too.
Refresh your memories with the details of the car, in the press releases below. And if you head out to the Chicago Auto Show this year, don't forget to drop by the Ford stand to have a look.

How Ford secretly used customers to test its aluminum F-150 [w/video]

Fri, 30 May 2014

Automakers getting clever about disguising development vehicles isn't anything new. Between mules wearing the sheetmetal of other cars and prototypes decked out in as much camouflage as is practical, automakers know how to make it very difficult for the general public to get an exact idea of what kind of vehicle is in development. Ford, though, is rapidly becoming the master.
We knew that the Blue Oval originally tested the durability of the aluminum construction being used for the 2015 F-150 by building an all-aluminum 2014 truck and entering it in the Baja 1000 off-road race. That's no longer a secret. What we didn't know, though, is that the aluminum development dates back to before even that, and that some of the people in question had no idea what it was they were working with.
Ford says this is the first time prototypes have ever been handed over to the public.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.