Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Ford Ford Gt Collector Quality Call Chris (816)365-6010 on 2040-cars

US $269,988.00
Year:2005 Mileage:5600
Location:

Peculiar, Missouri, United States

Peculiar, Missouri, United States

2005 FORD GT:

 OPTIONS:

 * PAINTED STRIPES

 * BLACK CALIPERS

 * LIGHTWEIGHT BBS WHEELS

 * MCINTOSH STEREO

THIS IS ONE REALLY NICE GT! NO PAINT, NO STORIES FORD GT. SHE HAS ONLY 5600 MILES ON HER, SHOWS LIKE A 1000 MILE CAR. 


COMES WITH :

BOTH SETS OF KEYS & REMOTES

OWNERS MANUAL

BATTERY TENDER

TOW HOOK

TIRE REFILL KIT

ANY QUESTIONS ? CALL CHRIS AT 1-816-365-6010 OR EMAIL ME AT CHRIS @DESNEUXMOTORSPORTS.COM  CHECK US OUT ON FACEBOOK SEE WHAT OR CUSTOMERS HAVE TO SAY!! GIVE US A LIKE IF YOU LIKE OUR PAGE!!

NOTE: WE DO NOT CLAIM TO BE THE WORLDS LARGEST FORD GT RETAILER!!! DESNEUX MOTORSPORTS WANTS TO BE YOUR CAR DEALER OF CHOICE FOR LIFE!! WE TRY TO BUY AND SELL AT FAIR MARKET VALUE. WE SIMPLY SELL THE BEST FOR A LOT LESS!!








Warranty:

This vehicle is being sold as is, where is with no warranty, expressed written or implied. The seller shall not be responsible for the correct description, authenticity, genuineness, or defects herein, and makes no warranty in connection therewith. No allowance or set aside will be made on account of any incorrectness, imperfection, defect or damage. Any descriptions or representations are for identification purposes only and are not to be construed as a warranty of any type. It is the responsibility of the buyer to have thoroughly inspected the vehicle, and to have satisfied himself or herself as to the condition and value and to bid based upon that judgement solely. The seller shall and will make every reasonable effort to disclose any known defects associated with this vehicle at the buyer's request prior to the close of sale. This contract shall be governed by the State of Missouri . Any controversy or claim arising out  of or relating to this contract , or the breach thereof, shall take place in the State of Missouri and under the purview of its Courts. If any such claim results in a decision or Judgement in favor of seller, Buyer shall be responsible for any and all cost, including reasonable attorney's fess,arises from said claim and /or litigation.





Ford Ford GT for Sale

Auto Services in Missouri

Value Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 2819 Gillham Rd, Pleasant-Valley
Phone: (816) 931-5100

The Car ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 3107 E Chestnut Expy, Fordland
Phone: (417) 865-2500

Ted`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 405 SE 10th St, Napoleon
Phone: (816) 690-7268

Swafford`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Brake Repair
Address: 1319 N Westwood Blvd, Poplar-Bluff
Phone: (573) 686-4243

Strosnider Enterprises ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3355 E Terra Ln, Old-Monroe
Phone: (866) 595-6470

St. Louis Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 128 Long Rd, Chesterfield
Phone: (314) 485-4157

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Martini Mustang is a 'what if moment' gone right

Wed, 23 Oct 2013

Feast your eyes on a masterpiece. This is Steve Strope's Ford Mustang in the classic fastback bodystyle, and as you'll notice, it sports the signature colors of Martini Racing, a livery that's as legendary as any Gulf Racing-styled car. But the red, white and blues of the Martini stripe down this Mustang's middle tell only a very small part of the story, in the latest video from Petrolicious.
What would you guess is under the hood? A 289-cubic-inch V8? Maybe a 302, or some absurd Ford crate engine? Maybe Strope went all Tokyo Drift - he's actually responsible for the "Hammer" Plymouth Satellite driven by Vin Diesel at the end of the movie - and found an RB26DETT to drop into the pony car? You'd be wrong on all counts.
This mad, mad man somehow finagled a Ford-Lotus engine from a 1966 Indianapolis 500 car into the Mustang's engine bay. Yes, a Mustang with an engine designed for a 160-mile-per-hour, open-wheel racecar. That's like someone in 40 years dropping McLaren's 2.4-liter V8 from the MP4-28 into a Scion FR-S. It'd just make a monster.

The biggest gas-guzzlers of 2024: 'The Meanest List' is the opposite of greenest cars

Thu, Mar 14 2024

In some circles — especially some automotive circles — bigger is better. This explains the Hummer, for example. In its so-called “Meanest List” of a dozen models, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) makes no apologies for berating “the worst-performing mass market automobiles” sold in 2024 in the U.S. The most diminutive car on the list is a Chevy Corvette Z06. At the top of this particular heap is the Mercedes-Benz AMG G63, a gas-powered SUV that the environmental agency says was “the worst-performing vehicle of the more than 1,200 models assessed by Greener Cars and has an annual fuel cost over $4,000.” Not to mention its MSRP of around $184,000. Rank Make & Model Powertrain Green Score MSRP Estimated Annual Fuel Cost* 1 Mercedes-Benz AMG G63 Gas 20 $184,000 $4,242 2 Ram 1500 TRX 4x4 Gas 22 $98,335 $3,819 3 Ford F150 Raptor R Gas 24 $79,975 $3,777 4 Cadillac Escalade V Gas 26 $152,295 $3,388 5 Dodge Durango SRT Gas 26 $74,995 $3,332 6 Jeep Wrangler 4dr 4X4 Gas 27 $35,895 $3,260 7 Jeep Grand Wagoneer 4x4 Gas 28 $91,945 $3,058 8 Mercedes-Benz G550 Gas 28 $143,000 $3,186 9 GMC Hummer EV SUV EV 29 $98,845 $1,746 10 GMC Sierra Gas 29 $37,700 $3,069 11 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Gas 30 $114,395 $3,169 12 Mercedes-Benz Maybach S680 Gas 30 $234,300 $3,031 *ACEEE analysis using EIA data of the annual cost of driving 15,000 miles In terms of numbers, the dirty dozen of the meanest includes seven SUVs and three trucks. Lonely at the middle of the list is the sole electric, the GMC Hummer EV, which weighs in at 9,000 pounds. The council notes that “though EVs have lower emissions than similarly sized gasoline models, the Hummer demonstrates that size and efficiency, not just fuel source, are important factors in a carÂ’s environmental impact.” ItÂ’s also worth reminding prospective buyers that the average fuel cost of a vehicle on the “Greenest List” eats up only a fifth of the fuel cost of a vehicle on the Meanest List, “showing that greener options can also be more affordable.” The ACEEE also put out a "Greener List" of efficient gasoline and hybrid cars that don't require plugging in.  By the Numbers Green Cadillac Chevrolet Dodge Ford GMC Hummer Jeep Maybach Mercedes-Benz RAM Emissions Fuel Efficiency Green Automakers Truck SUV Electric Hybrid