1967 Ford Falcon Stationwagon on 2040-cars
Stacy, Minnesota, United States
Engine:289
Body Type:Wagon
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Exterior Color: Red
Make: Ford
Interior Color: White Vinyl except front bucket seat
Model: Falcon
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: Futura
Drive Type: Rear Wheel
Mileage: 0
Sub Model: Futura
You are bidding on a 1967 Ford Falcon Wagon. 289 V8 Automatic. Installed new timing chain, new electronic ignition, new chrome valve covers, new air filter, new water pump. I have a spare steering column. Have a rust free tailgate. This car is in the process of being restored. I have to many projects and decided to sell this one. Needs interior to be finished, new paint, repair drivers window so it will roll up and down, padded dash needs to be replaced. Station wagons have become very popular and are becoming in high demand. This car is sold "As Is" with no warranties expressed or implied. Buyer is responsible for all cost of shipping or pick up. Car has been stored for 11 years in a heated garage. Headliner does have some mice holes in it from previous owner. Some rust. See pictures. Title provided after full payment clears.
All shipping or pickup to be paid by buyer. I will accept certified checks, cash or PayPal. Payment must be received and cleared prior to pick up or shipping.
Ford Falcon for Sale
1966 falcon sport coupe
1965 ford falcon futura wagon
1963 1/2 ford falcon sprint - running project - v8/stick/bucket seats/console(US $3,500.00)
1963 ford falcon base 2.8l(US $3,300.00)
1964 ford falcon ranchero resto mod - blower- 5.0 cobra mustang motor - hot rod
1963 ford falcon convertible complete restoration sport model. very rare
Auto Services in Minnesota
Sundberg`s Automotive ★★★★★
Streamline Automotive ★★★★★
Sharp Auto Parts ★★★★★
Quick Lane ★★★★★
Perlick Auto Body ★★★★★
Ossie`s Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Buy Ford and GM stock and make 5%
Tue, Feb 2 2016Want to make a five-percent return when 10-year treasuries are paying around two percent? Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) have solid balance sheets, strong cash flow, solid earnings, and growing markets. By all accounts, they are smart investments. But the market is down on these stocks. Why? Some of the stupid excuses include: They are cyclical companies The Detroit 3 have lost 3.5 million in sales since 2000 The world economy is shaky GM recently filed for bankruptcy Their markets have peaked They haven't changed their ways Let's take these criticisms one by one: They Are Cyclical Companies Yes, they are cyclical. Every company is cyclical. Every industry is cyclical. Some more than others, but not every company is immune from swings in the market. Banks used to be 'non-cyclical' leader, not anymore. Airline stocks are just as cyclical as auto stocks, yet they are trading at multiples greater than the auto industry. Why? And what accounts for the irrational stock price for Tesla (TSLA)? At least Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) make money and have positive cash flows. In fact, both companies have a net positive cash position. They have more cash on hand than liabilities. Auto sales in the United States hit a record 17.5 million vehicles in 2015. During the Great Recession, Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) cut their break even points to 10 million vehicles per year. Anything above an annual U.S. volume of 10 million vehicles is profit. And what a profit they make. Sales of Ford's F-150 continues to be the best-selling vehicle in the United States for over 30 years. Detroit 3 Have Lost 3.5 million in Sales Since 2000 Automotive News reports General Motors (GM), Ford (F) and Chrysler (FCA) have lost a combined 3.5 million vehicles sales since 2000. So how can they be making more money? Two big reasons – Fleet Sales and the UAW. Fleet Sales The Detroit 3 used to own car rental companies to keep their factories running. Ford owned Hertz (HTZ), General Motors owned all of National Car Rental and 29 percent of Avis, and Chrysler, the forerunner to Fiat Chrysler (FCA), used to own Thrifty Car Rental and Dollar Rent-A-Car. The Detroit 3 owned these rental companies to have a place to sell their bad product and keep their factories running. These were low margin sales, and in many cases, were money losers for the Detroit 3. They no longer own auto rental companies.
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter and Ford Transit can haul on the track
Tue, 19 Aug 2014Line up any two comparable vehicles, and eople are going to want to race them. Need proof? In its latest track battle, Auto Express wants to know which commercial vehicle can lap a circuit faster - a Ford Transit or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter. Let's face it, neither of these European vans were ever meant to be near the track unless they are delivering a racecar and a ton of parts for a fun weekend, but it's massively fun to watch them give it a go anyway.
The one thing that Auto Express really illustrates here is the modern marvel that is stability control. The driver hops curves, and these big vans lean in the corners like your friend walking home from a long night at the bar. However, because of the amazing stability systems, the vans mostly keep all of their wheels planted and never seem close to getting sloppy, despite their behemoth size.
Unfortunately, the two vans aren't exactly fairly paired. The Ford has a dual rear axle and a few other advantages over the Mercedes, but it's still hilarious to watch them go. Even better, the host breaks down everything happening behind the wheel like these commercial vehicles were two Porsches. Enjoy watching this very unorthodox battle between Ford and Mercedes.
Ford posts decade-best $2.1B profit in Q1 2013
Wed, 24 Apr 2013As predicted, Ford has reported that its first quarter of 2013 was a resounding success overall, with a pretax profit of $2.1 billion ($0.41 per share), and a net income of $1.6 billion ($0.40 per share). In fact, Ford made a pretax profit of some $2.4 billion in its home North American market, with that total number being pulled down by losses in South America and Europe. That gaudy North American profit is the strongest result by the automaker since 2000.
Ford's companywide profit for Q1 was down $147 million from one year ago, while the net income number marked an increase of $215 million year over year. Overall, this is Ford's 15th-consecutive profitable quarter.
The bad news from the European market was even worst in Q1 2013 than it was last year. Pretax losses of $462 million - on revenue of $6.7 billion - represented a year-over-year change of -$313 million. In South American, the company reported a loss of $218 million, down from a slim profit of $54 million in Q1 2012. The news was better for Ford Asia Pacific Africa, where a $6 million pretax profit in 2013 showed a year-over-year gain of some $101 million when compared to losses in 2012. Scroll down to read Ford's full press release.