Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Fairlane 500 Convertible on 2040-cars

US $18,995.00
Year:1966 Mileage:188
Location:

Staunton, Virginia, United States

Staunton, Virginia, United States
Advertising:

Up for auction is a beautiful 1966 Ford Fairlane 500 convertible. A very nice car with power top, automatic transmission, 289 engine and equipped with an electric cooling fan. It is a real classy car and gets attention everywhere you go. A real hit at the cruise-ins and car shows. The Magnum 500 wheels look perfect on this car and the paint and interior is a nice driver quality. The car runs and drives really nice and has that deep throaty sound with the headers and dual flow master exhaust. The car is equipped with the original radio however it is not working. The mileage is unknown. All lights, signals, wipers and power top work as they should. You are welcome to inspect car but must do so before bidding and not after you have won the auction. I reserve the right to end auction early as the car is also for sale locally. A deposit of $1,000.00 must be paid via pay pal at end of auction and car must be paid in full within 7 days of auction closing. You will need to come pick car up or arrange and pay shipping. It is your responsibility. I will accept final balance after deposit by either cash, wired funds or certified bank cashiers check that is verified. The car is for sale in United States only. If you are out of country and you bid, I will cancel unless you contact me first. This is a very nice car so bid to win.     

Auto Services in Virginia

Wilson`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1925 E Pembroke Ave, Fort-Monroe
Phone: (757) 727-0008

Wicomico Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 5345 Jessie Dupont Memorial Hwy, Heathsville
Phone: (804) 580-8419

Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 23101 Old Valley Pike, Berryville
Phone: (540) 459-2005

Toyota of Stafford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 95 Garrisonville Rd, Ruby
Phone: (888) 607-9714

Tire City New & Used tires & Affordable Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Machine Shops
Address: 3655 N Military Hwy, Norfolk
Phone: (757) 588-5660

The Brake Squad - Mobile Brake Repair Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Repair Referral Service, Brake Repair
Address: Fairfax
Phone: (703) 994-2773

Auto blog

2016 Ford Focus RS mule spotted on US soil

Tue, 17 Jun 2014

Okay Ford, this is what we like to see. One of our intrepid spy photographers has captured a vehicle that we weren't even sure would see the light of day - the next Focus RS. While this is pretty clearly a mule based on the current Focus ST, as our spy points out, there are a number of giveaways about this hot hatch's true nature.
Indication number one that all is not right with this Focus is the heavily camo'd front fascia, which has been completely reconfigured for duty on the RS. It boasts significantly larger grilles that are meant to accommodate what is likely the 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder that's destined for the 2015 Ford Mustang. Considering that, then, we can expect around 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque from the hottest of Foci, although it's entirely possible that the production model could climb even higher, to around 330 hp.
The front fascia tweaks are complemented in the back by a modified rear bumper, which fails at hiding a pair of exhaust tips quite unlike the standard Focus ST's center-exit exhaust. Other obvious changes include the wheel/tire/brake package on this particular car. Larger 19-inch wheels are shod in super-sticky Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires in 235/35/19 while the brakes feature what we think are four-piston calipers, possibly from Brembo, up front.

For EV drivers, realities may dampen the electric elation

Mon, Feb 20 2023

The Atlantic, a decades-old monthly journal well-regarded for its intelligent essays on international news, American politics and cultural happenings, recently turned its attention to the car world. A piece that ran in The Atlantic in October examined the excesses of the GMC Hummer EV for compromising safety. And now in its latest edition, the magazine ran a compelling story about the challenges of driving an electric vehicle and how those experiences “mythologize the car as the great equalizer.” Titled “The Inconvenient Truth About Electric Vehicles,” the story addresses the economics of EVs, the stresses related to range anxiety, the social effects of owning an electric car — as in, affording one — and the overarching need for places to recharge that car. Basically, author Andrew Moseman says that EV life isn't so rosy: “On the eve of the long-promised electric-vehicle revolution, the myth is due for an update. Americans who take the plunge and buy their first EV will find a lot to love Â… they may also find that electric-vehicle ownership upends notions about driving, cost, and freedom, including how much car your money can buy. "No one spends an extra $5,000 to get a bigger gas tank in a Honda Civic, but with an EV, economic status is suddenly more connected to how much of the world you get to see — and how stressed out or annoyed youÂ’ll feel along the way.” Moseman charts how a basic Ford F-150 Lightning electric truck might start at $55,000, but an extended-range battery, which stretches the distance on a charge from 230 miles to 320, “raises the cost to at least $80,000. The trend holds true with all-electric brands such as Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid, and for many electric offerings from legacy automakers. The bigger battery option can add a four- or five-figure bump to an already accelerating sticker price.” As for the charging issue, the author details his anxiety driving a Telsa in Death Valley, with no charging stations in sight. “For those who never leave the comfort of the city, these concerns sound negligible," he says. "But so many of us want our cars to do everything, go everywhere, ferry us to the boundless life we imagine (or the one weÂ’re promised in car commercials),” he writes. His conclusions may raise some hackles among those of us who value automotive independence — not to mention fun — over practicalities.

IIHS updates overlap test: 2 SUVs get good marks, 9 fare poorly

Tue, Dec 13 2022

Vehicles in crashes keep occupants safe by deforming around the cabin in a way that maintains cabin integrity. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's moderate overlap test, introduced in 1995, has been a huge contributor to improved safety for front-row passengers in a crash. IIHS President David Harkey said, "Thanks to automakers’ improvements, drivers in most vehicles are nearly 50% less likely to be killed in a frontal crash today than they were 25 years ago." In the 'unintentional side effects' column, crash safety has gotten worse for passengers in the back seats. When carmakers reengineered the front crash structure to protect the driver, more crash forces got distributed throughout the rear. IIHS research claims rear passengers have a 46% greater risk of fatal injury than front-row passengers, but back-seaters haven't benefited from the same upgrades in safety as the front row. The IIHS updated its moderate overlap test to address the issue, putting 15 vehicles through the new regime. Two earned good ratings — the 2023 Ford Escape and the 2021-2023 Volvo XC40 — one was acceptable, three were marginal and nine were rated poor. Every one of the crossovers sampled got good marks for all passengers in the original test. That test sees 40% of vehicle's width on the driver's side impacting an aluminum honeycomb barrier at 40 miles per hour. The updated test puts a crash dummy representing small woman or 12-year-old child in the seat behind the driver, the dummy's sensors and grease paint measuring the effectiveness of the restraints and the forces a human body would need to endure. To achieve a good rating, the "measurements must not exceed limits indicating excessive risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, abdomen or thigh." An institute engineer said, "In real-world crashes, chest injuries are the most common serious rear-seat injuries for adults." The sensors and video evidence showed back seat dummies in the Escape and XC40 endured minimal risk of injuries from excessive crash forces, from submarining under the seat belt, or from unwanted interaction with the side curtain airbag.   The Toyota RAV4 scored acceptable. The second-row dummy also endured minimal risk of injury to the chest and lower extremities. However, the lap belt slipped upward in a way that could increase abdominal injuries, and after the dummy's head dipped during crash impact, the head came back up between the rear curtain airbag and rear window.