NICE RUNNING 1964 FORD FAIRLANE HAS 289 FOR MOTOR WHICH RUNS STRONG NEW TIRES THE RIMS ARE THE ONES THAT CAME WITH THE CAR COMES WITH THE FATORY A C IT IS SITTING IN THE TRUNK NEW EXHAUST FROM THE ENGINE BACK TO BACK BUMMPER THE ONLY RUST IS IN THE FRONT FENDERS SOME SURFACE RUST ALONG THE CAR HEADLINER IS TORN DONT KNOW IF MILAGE IS 153000 OR 53000 GREAT DRIVER RESTORE AS YOU DRIVE IT THIS IS NOT A NEW CAR ITS 50YEARS OLD GREAT SHAPE FOR ITS AGE
|
Ford Fairlane for Sale
58 ford fairlane 500
1967 ford fairlane 500 convertible 289 automatic
1958 ford fairlane 500 skyliner
Classic 1954 ford fairlane sunliner convertible, red(US $18,495.00)
Wow what and amazing 1965 ford fairlane 500 ,super clean 289 v8 best of the best
1963 ford fairlane 4 door 6cyl engine good start daily driver no reserver
Auto Services in Kansas
Topeka Battery Co ★★★★★
Tim Worthy`s Transmission Repair ★★★★★
Susquehanna Auto Clinic ★★★★★
O`Reilly Auto Parts ★★★★★
Outlaw Auto Sports ★★★★★
Olathe Auto Paints & Supplies Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford calling in 28k Edge crossovers over fuel line leak
Thu, 16 Jan 2014A problem with the fuel line on certain examples of the Ford Edge has prompted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a recall. The issue revolves around the metal housing on the fuel line pulse damper, which was apparently improperly manufactured in the first place and is prone to crack in certain circumstances, leading to a fuel leak. And as we all know, a fuel leak is not a good thing.
The problem affects model year 2012 and 2013 Edge crossovers equipped with the 2.0-liter engine and manufactured between September 2, 2010 and April 25, 2013 - a total of 27,933 units. Although the Lincoln MKX is closely related to the Edge, since it isn't offered with the same engine (to which the problem is related), the recall does not include the premium-badged version. See the recall notice below for further details.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #329 LIVE!
Mon, 15 Apr 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #329 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #329
Subcompact sales slump, yet again