Nice! 2003 Ford Truck/f-350 Super Duty,6.0 Turbo Diesel! Only, 40,000 Miles!!! on 2040-cars
Galax, Virginia, United States
Engine:6.0 POWER STROKE TURBO DIESEL
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Trim: SUPER DUTY SUPERCAB 4 DOOR
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: 4 WHEEL DRIVE
Mileage: 40,774
Exterior Color: WHITE & GRAY
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
FORD F-350: SUPER DUTY F-SERIES
Number of Cylinders: 6
Ford F-350 for Sale
- 1999 ford f-350 sd utility w/ walkin mechanics box gas, auto ex at&t flt mnt'd(US $7,975.00)
- 1999 ford f-350 sd 7.3 ltr diesel auto 62k orig miles one owner fleet maintained(US $7,975.00)
- 2002 ford f-350 sd 9 ft flatbed 22k original miles off lease fleet maintained(US $5,975.00)
- Custom f350 diesel dually sleeper(US $10,500.00)
- 1993 ford f-350 7.3 l idi diesel w/ ats turbo pickup truck(US $10,000.00)
- 1995 ford f350 4x4 98k original miles super nice truck
Auto Services in Virginia
Wynne Ford ★★★★★
Wilson`s Towing ★★★★★
Wards Truck & Auto Ctr ★★★★★
Virginia Auto Glass Inc ★★★★★
Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★
The Parts House ★★★★★
Auto blog
First 1K next-gen Mustangs to carry 2014 1/2 model year?
Thu, 18 Jul 2013A new report from Mustangs Daily, citing insider sources at Ford, tells us that the Blue Oval will produce 1,000 next-generation Mustangs with the model year designation of 2014 ½, to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the storied marque. The commemorative half-year designation is a rumor that's been swirling in Mustang forums for quite some time now, and seems more plausible than ever with this most recent report. Certainly it's not far-fetched to believe that Ford will want to make a big deal of the golden anniversary for its most-loved model.
The story (compiled by Drew Phillips, who runs the aforementioned Mustang site when he's not directing the photography on these pages) goes on to say that the limited-run cars will be the first built on the new Mustang platform internally known as S550 (and spied testing in the attached gallery). Each car is said to carry a "special" VIN and build number, though no performance upgrades versus the 2015 cars to follow are in the works. A collector's dream then, rather than a weekend racer's.
Ford blamed in drug mule lawsuit
Tue, 30 Jul 2013If a college student is caught smuggling drugs across the border, one might think the kid got what was coming to him. But when a Mexican student at the University of Texas in El Paso was caught by Border Patrol agents with duffel bags filled with marijuana in his trunk, the man used a classic excuse: He claimed they weren't his.
While a claim like that is almost unbelievable, Ricardo Magallanes, the student, is now suing Ford for handling its vehicles' key codes negligently enough to allow drug smugglers to break into his Ford Focus and stash the drugs, The Daily Caller reports. The twist here is that four other people who lived in Juarez and worked in El Paso were involved in the same type of scheme - allegedly unwittingly, just like Magallanes - and all the cars were Fords except one model from General Motors. FBI agents also found an employee at a Dallas Ford dealership that had accessed the key codes to all four of the cannabis-stuffed Fords.
While we all may not own Fords, the case still causes us slight paranoia. We'll definitely be checking our trunks before we cross any more international borders.
After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality
Fri, Jan 3 2014Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.