Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F350 on 2040-cars

US $62,560.00
Year:2014 Mileage:7 Color: Gray
Location:

1511 Hwy 52, Moncks Corner, South Carolina, United States

1511 Hwy 52, Moncks Corner, South Carolina, United States
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:6.7L V8 32V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT8W3BT5EEB49489
Stock Num: 2886
Make: Ford
Model: F350
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 35.0 gal.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 59 cu.ft.
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 80.8"
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.8"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 42.1"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 7

New vehicle prices include all Ford Motor Company public rebates. Prices also include Ford Credit rebates and Ford Motor Company trade-in assistance rebates where applicable. Not all buyers will qualify. Prices also include a $295.00 Closing Fee. All prices are plus tax and tag fees.

Auto Services in South Carolina

Williams Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 3995 Dorchester RD, Summerville
Phone: (843) 554-0700

Sully`s Wholesale ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 115 College Park Rd, Goose-Creek
Phone: (843) 818-2228

Steel City Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1506 Absco Dr, Longs
Phone: (843) 399-9150

Simmons Auto Collision Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 3901 Highway 25 N, Hodges
Phone: (864) 374-7848

Robert Smith`s Repair Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: Smyrna
Phone: (704) 349-8401

Right Choice Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 9462 Highway 78, North-Charleston
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output

Mon, Jan 6 2014

How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.

Ford files trademark application for 'Model E'

Fri, 27 Dec 2013

In early December, Ford filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the name "Model E." Historically, Ford never produced a Model E, and while automakers are known to file for trademarks they never use, some have wondered if the application might be used for a concept car.
Based on other recent events, though, it could be a legal move. In 2000 Ford sued an online start-up called Model E over the similarity of that name to Ford's industry-shaping Model T, but the judge dismissed the case citing lack of proper grounds. In August 2013, Tesla applied for trademark registration for Model E, and at the time, Ford said it would review the application. Tesla actually made two applications for Model E, one for automobiles and structural parts therefore, the other for "providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles," and there are plenty of theories about what the name could be applied to.
The Published for Opposition date for Tesla's applications is December 31, 2013, after which anyone who thinks they'd be harmed by Tesla being granted the trademark gets 30 days to register their issues. This is just speculation, but Ford's application - which was filed for automobiles only - might be about protecting what it sees as unwelcome encroachment on the name Model T, protection it wasn't able to enforce before when the stakes were only online and much smaller.

Ford not backing down on MPG-based marketing strategy

Thu, Jun 26 2014

The Blue Oval may have to back off a bit from the green messaging. Ford has had to lower fuel-economy ratings on a number of 2013 and 2014 model-year vehicles, namely its hybrids. And that may force the US automaker to rethink some of its marketing strategy, Automotive News reports. Ford has spent much of the year pushing its fuel-efficiency improvements, with everything from a Super Bowl ad saying its Fusion Hybrid gets "almost double" the fuel efficiency of an average vehicle (after the recalculation, it's now more like 75 percent better) to claiming the Fiesta is the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid in the US (it's actually the Mitsubishi Mirage) to stating the C-Max Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the Toyota Prius V (it doesn't). Nonetheless, Ford doesn't plan on changing its mpg marketing emphasis anytime soon, the company said in an e-mailed statement to AutoblogGreen. "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA." "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA," the company said. "We will continue to highlight our vehicles features and attributes in our advertising and marketing, which includes fuel economy and fuel-saving technologies like EcoBoost and hybrids." Earlier this month, Ford said it would lower the fuel-economy ratings of models such as the C-Max, Fusion and Lincoln MKZ Hybrids as well as most of the Fiesta line because of mistakes in the company's internal testing data. It was the second change for the C-Max Hybrid. The good news for Ford is that its fleetwide fuel economy is up almost 40 percent from a decade ago, compared to an improvement of around 23 percent for Toyota. Still, while sales of Ford hybrids and plug-ins are about even with last year through the first five months of 2014, C-Max Hybrid sales have plunged 49 percent from a year earlier. Earlier this year, Ford admitted that the first fuel economy downgrade had a negative effect on sales and we can find proof in the numbers. Before that the change was announced, in August 2013, Ford was consistently selling over 2,000 – and sometimes over 3,000 – C-Max Hybrids a month. In September, it dropped to 1,424, then to 1,438 in October. It didn't climb back above 2,000 until May 2014. The second mpg adjustment was announced in June.