Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Pickup Used Diesel V8 6.0l/364 4wd Tan on 2040-cars

US $24,971.00
Year:2006 Mileage:38730 Color: Tan
Location:

Cullman, Alabama, United States

Cullman, Alabama, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Pickup
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:Diesel V8 6.0L/364
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FTWX33P16EC45076
Year: 2006
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Options: Four Wheel Drive, Tow Hooks, Dual Rear Wheels,
Mileage: 38,730
Vehicle Condition: Used
Sub Model: Lariat
Number Of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Tan

Auto Services in Alabama

Trax Tires Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 5654 Highway 90, Mobile
Phone: (251) 653-1053

Tod`s Auto Repair & Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Coffee-Springs
Phone: (334) 673-8500

Street Scene Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7112 Gadsden Hwy, Watson
Phone: (205) 683-1624

Roy`s Discount Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 234 Maple St, Ranburne
Phone: (770) 834-6674

Ronnie Watkins Ford ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 101 George Wallace Dr, Gadsden
Phone: (256) 543-9400

Pensacola Used Cars ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 6318 N Palafox St, Seminole
Phone: (251) 263-8618

Auto blog

Project Ugly Horse: Part VI

Thu, 21 Mar 2013

Solid axle? What solid axle?
I was fully prepared to embark on a seven-day journey down a rabbit hole of broken bolts, internet hearsay and consternation.
This should not have gone this easily. Having a long and checkered history of simple projects punctuated by much wailing and gnashing of knuckles, I was fully prepared to embark on a seven-day journey down a rabbit hole of broken bolts, internet hearsay and consternation when I finally decided to lay hands on the '89 Mustang with the goal of relieving the car of its stock rear axle. Instead, it took less than a full morning's worth of work to carve the old 7.5-inch solid axle from its moorings and mock up something, well, different.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

This is what a 3D-printed liquid metal Ford Torino looks like

Sat, 12 Oct 2013

Artist Ioan Florea has encapsulated a 1971 Ford Torino with 3-D-printed liquid metal transferred onto the car using technology that he developed, and the result is a stunningly shiny, seamless design.
"The surface has the highest coefficient of reflectivity never achieved before," Florea told us in an e-mail, using "nano-materials and nano-pigments that create an internal three-dimensional structure and dictate the polymer how to behave." Sure... We'll leave it to him to make any more 3-D-printed liquid metal-transferred art pieces.
Florea grew up in Romania, and the motivation behind picking the old Ford as his canvas came from his childhood memories of what an American car is - "big and wide and fascinating," he says - and the European name of the car itself, which it shares with an Italian city.