1999 Ford F350 Lariat Super Duty on 2040-cars
5010 W Market St, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Engine:7.3L V8 16V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTWW32F3XEA88101
Stock Num: TASA88101
Make: Ford
Model: F350 Lariat Super Duty
Year: 1999
Exterior Color: Green
Interior Color: Tan
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 178916
CONTACT US AND WE WILL SEND YOU A FREE CARFAX REPORT. WE HAVE 2 LOCATIONS PLEASE CALL BEFORE COMING! OUR ADDRESS'S ARE 5101 WEST MARKET STREET GREENSBORO NC 27409 OR 5720 WEST MARKET STREET GREENSBORO NC 27409! OVER 150 PRE-OWNED COMING IN EVERY DAY! PLEASE CALL TO MAKE SURE WE STILL HAVE THE CAR YOU ARE LOOKING AT! Visit Triad Auto Solutions online at www.triadautosolutions.com to see more pictures of this vehicle or call us at 888-459-9121 today to schedule your test drive. Test drives are available to anyone of the age of 21 or above with a valid drivers license. If you or your organization is looking to purchase a vehicle, please call us at 888-459-9121. If you or your organization wants us to contact you, please click the Car Finder tab at the top to let us know you were not able to find a car on our website. We try hard to offer the fastest service possible and someone will contact as soon as they are able too. Looking forward to speaking with you! Most honest in the business the honesty that everyone is looking for. Here at Triad Auto Solutions the customer is top priority. It does not matter what kind of car we get we make sure it is in great running condition so you the customer will not have to spend your money. We do a complete check of the car to give assurance to the buyer it is in tip top shape. We want to give you the peace of mind.
Ford F-350 for Sale
- 2001 ford f350 drw aerial(US $10,900.00)
- 2003 ford f350 xl(US $7,900.00)
- 2006 ford f350 xl(US $10,900.00)
- 2015 ford f350(US $63,220.00)
- 2011 ford f350 lariat super duty(US $41,871.00)
- 2014 ford f350(US $44,599.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Wood Tire & Alignment ★★★★★
Wilhelm`s ★★★★★
Wilcox Auto Sales ★★★★★
Town & Country Radiator ★★★★★
The Transmission Shop ★★★★★
The Auto Finders ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford readying three-row Edge for China
Fri, Nov 21 2014The next-generation Ford Edge will be available with quite a growth spurt for its debut in China next year, with newly announced plans also to build and sell a three-row version exclusively in the People's Republic. However, markets outside of there likely won't see the larger model. Ford marketing boss (and future head of Ford of Europe) Jim Farley announced the three-row version of the crossover at the Los Angeles Auto Show, according to Automotive News. To create the extra room, Ford made the Chinese-built variant about 16 inches longer than its two-row counterpart. Farley didn't specify at which of the Blue Oval's plants in the country this model would be assembled. The Explorer and forthcoming Everest already offer three rows from the Ford lineup in China, but the company thinks the market can easily support all of them. According to Farley to Automotive News, the utility segment is up 485 percent in the country since 2008. Customers in the US can still look forward to the two-row Edge hitting dealers early next year. It'll be the first model in the Blue Oval's lineup here to come standard with EcoBoost power.
Weekly Recap: Marchionne's Manifesto again calls for industry consolidation
Sat, May 2 2015Sergio Marchionne isn't taking no for an answer. Despite public rebuffs from General Motors and Ford, the leader of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles continues to push for consolidation within the auto industry. His latest assertion came Wednesday when he said a combination of FCA with another automaker could net savings of $5 billion or more annually. No, this isn't about selling his company, he claimed, it's about cutting costs. Put simply, the auto industry wastes money, Marchionne said during FCA's earnings conference call. Companies invest billions to develop basic components that all cars use, but many consumers don't care how they work or recognize the differences. "About half of this is really relevant in terms of positioning the car in the marketplace," he said. "The other half, in our view, is stuff which is neither visible to the consumer nor is it relevant to the consumer." In 2014, top automakers spent more than $100 million on product development, FCA estimated. Marchionne said consolidation could save up to $1 billion on powertrains alone, noting that almost every automaker offers four- and six-cylinder engines. Not everyone has to make their own, he contended. "The consumer could not give a flying leap whose engines we are using because they are irrelevant to the buying decision." That's pretty provocative for enthusiasts, but less so for average consumers. Still, there are major differences in power and efficiency ratings, even among similar engines. Skeptics could argue consolidation would also weaken competition and reduce choices for car buyers. Marchionne stressed his presentation, curiously entitled Confessions of a Capital Junkie, wouldn't require closing factories or dealerships. It's not his final "big deal" as CEO, intent to sell FCA, or a way to elevate his company up the automotive food chain. He claims he wants to fundamentally change the industry and its habit for burning cash. "The horrible part about this, and the thing that I find most offensive, is that the capital consumption rate is duplicative," he said. "It doesn't deliver real value to the consumer and it is in its purest form, economic waste." Other News & Notes Ford Profits dip in first quarter Ford profits fell $65 million to $924 million in the first quarter, hampered by slight dips in revenue and sales.
Ford, Volvo, Google, Uber and Lyft form self-driving alliance
Tue, Apr 26 2016Five companies arguably leading the worldwide effort to develop autonomous cars said Tuesday they're forming an organization to lobby the federal government to better prepare America's roads for self-driving technology. The founding members include some of the biggest companies in the automotive, autonomous, and ride-sharing realms – Ford, Google, Lyft, Uber and Volvo. Operating as the "Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets," they aim to work with lawmakers and regulators to clarify a disparate set of rules and regulations at both the state and federal levels that could hinder the deployment of autonomous cars. "The U.S. risks losing its leading position due to the lack of federal guidelines for the testing and certification of autonomous vehicles." – Hakan Samuelsson David Strickland, a former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration who issued the first set of autonomous-related policies in that role (pictured below), will serve as the group's counsel and spokesperson. "The best path for this innovation is to have one clear set of federal standards, and the Coalition will work with policymakers to find the right solutions that will facilitate the deployment of self-driving vehicles," he said in a written statement. In January, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said his department would accelerate efforts to craft such federal standards. Those efforts include holding two public hearings on standards, the second of which is scheduled to be held Wednesday in Palo Alto, California. Foxx signaled the intent to deliver them by June. Google has been leading the efforts to ensure such standards are national in scope, warning their cars could run afoul of state-specific laws should they cross state borders or if standards varies between the federal efforts and regional ones. The complexity of such efforts was underscored recently, when NHTSA agreed that Google's software could be considered the driver of a vehicle for the purpose of meeting federal motor vehicle standards, an interpretation that would conflict with preliminary California rules that mandate a licensed driver operate a self-driving car that comes equipped with human controls like a steering wheel and brakes. At South By Southwest last month, Jennifer Haroon, Google's self-driving car business leader, said the company couldn't accomplish its goals under those regulations.