F-250, 7.3 Turbo Diesel, Xlt Extended Cab, Long Bed on 2040-cars
Lebanon, Tennessee, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:7.3 Turbo diesel
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Trim: XLT
Options: Cassette Player
Drive Type: Rear wheel drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 98,666
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
This truck is in EXCELLENT CONDITION for a 1996, with only 98,666 miles at time of listing. It has the 7.3 Turbo Diesel engine, with power steering, cold A/C, power windows, power door locks, keyless entry, tilt wheel, factory running boards, factory aluminum wheels, tow package with trailer brakes and a new RHINO bedliner. Interior is in great shape with only one small half inch crack in dash and one small dot in drivers seat that can be seen in the pictures. This is a non smokers truck and is clean and well maintained. Buyer is responsible for shipping or pickup. If you have any questions, you may call me at 615/300.1946 between 7 AM and 10 PM Central Daylight time.
Ford F-250 for Sale
- 4x4 cabelas lifted navigation mx6 suspension moto metal toyo 2010 ford f250 29k(US $36,900.00)
- F250 diesel 6.4l white crew cab 4x4 4wd lariat certified warranty leather
- 06 ford f250 super duty crew cab diesel 4x4
- 2005 used 6.8l v10 30v 4wd
- 01 f250 ex cab 7.3 liter powerstroke diesel 4x4 4wd clean carfax strong f250
- 99 f250 superduty v10 4x4 5 speed standard
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
White & Peels Auto Center ★★★★★
West Broad Auto Sales ★★★★★
Topside Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Stout`s Riverside Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton
Tue, Jul 14 2020The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender. Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys. As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more. On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.
Ford and 'Dirty Jobs' pitchman Mike Rowe part ways [w/videos]
Thu, 20 Feb 2014Former Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe has one less job as of today - the pitchman is no longer a pitchman for Ford, with yesterday's announcement from Rowe ending a seven-year partnership between the TV host and the Blue Oval.
Rowe made the announcement to political pundit Glenn Beck, saying the two are "going in different directions" and wishing Ford "every possibly success that any car company could ever have," according to The Detroit News. Rowe and Ford got together in 2005, right around the time the 51-year-old came to prominence as the host of Dirty Jobs and the narrator for Deadliest Catch, two of the Discovery Channel's most popular shows.
Take a look below for a few video snippets of Rowe's tenure at Ford.
MotorWeek relives '80s coupes with Dodge Daytona, Ford Escort EXP
Thu, Aug 6 2015Get ready for a wave of nostalgia and the rapid realization of the huge progress in performance cars over the last 30 years. For its latest Retro Review, MotorWeek takes a look back at two, front-wheel drive coupes from the '80s that seem to have entirely vanished from the roads today. Both the 1986 Dodge Daytona CS and the 1986.5 Ford Escort EXP were considered affordable, sporty options in their day, but the passage of time hasn't been kind to either of their specs. The Daytona certainly looks the part of a performance machine with a body that's reminiscent of other '80s coupes, like the third-gen Chevrolet Camaro. However with 146 horsepower and 170 pound-feet of torque from a 2.2-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, acceleration wasn't exactly a strong suit. MotorWeek complained about copious torque steer, as well. The optional CS suspension upgrade package on this Daytona was apparently a nod to Carroll Shelby who was working with Dodge at the time. If anything, the Escort EXP withstands the test of time even worse. As a two-seat coupe, you might have expected Ford's engineers to really turn up the performance to fit the sporty image that the exterior conveyed. That didn't really happen, and depending on which model buyers ordered, they got either 86 horsepower with a 1.9-liter engine or the "high-output" version of that mill with 108 hp.