Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2015 Ford F250 Xl on 2040-cars

US $37,986.00
Year:2015 Mileage:0 Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic /
 Steel
Location:

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT7X2B62FEA10936
Stock Num: 22337
Make: Ford
Model: F250 XL
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic
Interior Color: Steel
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 35.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 10,000 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 6.9 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 40 cu.ft.
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 38.1"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 31.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.1"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Auto Services in Missouri

Value Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 2819 Gillham Rd, Pleasant-Valley
Phone: (816) 931-5100

The Car ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 3107 E Chestnut Expy, Fordland
Phone: (417) 865-2500

Ted`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 405 SE 10th St, Napoleon
Phone: (816) 690-7268

Swafford`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Brake Repair
Address: 1319 N Westwood Blvd, Poplar-Bluff
Phone: (573) 686-4243

Strosnider Enterprises ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3355 E Terra Ln, Old-Monroe
Phone: (866) 595-6470

St. Louis Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 128 Long Rd, Chesterfield
Phone: (314) 485-4157

Auto blog

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

Bring back the Bronco! Trademarks we hope are actually (someday) future car names

Tue, Mar 17 2015

Trademark filings are the tea leaves of the auto industry. Read them carefully – and interpret them correctly – and you might be previewing an automaker's future product plans. Yes, they're routinely filed to maintain the rights to an iconic name. And sometimes they're only for toys and clothing. But not always. Sometimes, the truth is right in front of us. The trademark is required because a company actually wants to use the name on a new car. With that in mind, here's a list of intriguing trademark filings we want to see go from paperwork to production reality. Trademark: Bronco Company: Ford Previous Use: The Bronco was a long-running SUV that lived from 1966-1996. It's one of America's original SUVs and was responsible for the increased popularity of the segment. Still, it's best known as O.J. Simpson's would-be getaway car. We think: The Bronco was an icon. Everyone seems to want a Wrangler-fighter – Ford used to have a good one. Enough time has passed that the O.J. police chase isn't the immediate image conjured by the Bronco anymore. Even if we're doing a wish list in no particular order, the Bronco still finds its way to the top. For now (unfortunately), it's just federal paperwork. Rumors on this one can get especially heated. The official word from a Ford spokesman is: "Companies renew trademark filings to maintain ownership and control of the mark, even if it is not currently used. Ford values the iconic Bronco name and history." Trademarks: Aviator, AV8R Company: Ford Previous Use: The Aviator was one of the shortest-run Lincolns ever, lasting for the 2003-2005 model years. It never found the sales success of the Ford Explorer, with which it shared a platform. We Think: The Aviator name no longer fits with Lincoln's naming nomenclature. Too bad, it's better than any other name Lincoln currently uses, save for its former big brother, the Navigator. Perhaps we're barking up the wrong tree, though. Ford has made several customized, aviation themed-Mustangs in the past, including one called the Mustang AV8R in 2008, which had cues from the US Air Force's F-22 Raptor fighter jet. It sold for $500,000 at auction, and the glass roof – which is reminiscent of a fighter jet cockpit – helped Ford popularize the feature. Trademark: EcoBeast Company: Ford Previous Use: None by major carmakers.

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.