Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford F150 Xl on 2040-cars

US $23,500.00
Year:2011 Mileage:57861 Color: Red
Location:

4288 N Us Highway 259, Longview, Texas, United States

4288 N Us Highway 259, Longview, Texas, United States
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:3.7L V6 24V MPFI DOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTEW1CM9BFC00206
Stock Num: LPC00206
Make: Ford
Model: F150 XL
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear,
  • Curb weight: 5,128 lbs.
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 26.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 17 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 23 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Gross vehicle weight: 6,800 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.9 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 60 cu.ft.
  • Overall height: 74.8"
  • Overall Length: 231.8"
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear Head Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 64.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 43.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.5"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
  • Wheelbase: 145.0"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 57861

Auto Services in Texas

Youniversal Auto Care & Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Brake Repair
Address: 209 N Pleasant Valley Rd, Manor
Phone: (512) 386-5114

Xtreme Window Tinting & Alarms ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 6411 Mueller Ln Ste A, Hufsmith
Phone: (281) 374-9100

Vision Auto`s ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 2903 Canyon Dr, Amarillo
Phone: (806) 373-9887

Velocity Auto Care LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 200 Byrd St, Kemah
Phone: (409) 935-5000

US Auto House ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 7300 Ambassador Row, Farmers-Branch
Phone: (469) 522-0234

Unique Creations Paint & Body Shop Clinic ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Truck Painting & Lettering
Address: Dodson
Phone: (940) 761-2234

Auto blog

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.

Ford reveals EcoBoost-powered Riley prototype for Daytona 24

Tue, 01 Oct 2013

It's not the first time Ford has participated in the Daytona Prototype class as an engine supplier, but in revealing this new EcoBoost V6-powered Riley Technologies prototype for the new United SportsCar Championship, Ford is making a statement: "We want to show Ford EcoBoost's capabilities as an engine that provides both performance and fuel economy, on and off the track," says Jamie Allison, director of Ford Racing.
In addition to supplying the 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6, Ford had its production designer Garen Nicoghosian give the racecar brand-inspired design cues with support from Ford Racing chief aerodynamicist Bernie Marcus.
The car is scheduled to compete at next year's Rolex 24 at Daytona on January 25-26, but before that, Michael Shank Racing is working with Ford at another goal. Driving his Ford Thunderbird, NASCAR champion Bill Elliott set the track's top speed record at 210.364 miles per hour during a qualifying run for the Daytona 500 - way back in 1987 -- and Ford thinks it's about time for that record to fall. What better time the introduction of this new Ford-powered Daytona Prototype? Michael Shank Racing plans to use the twin-turbo V6-powered racer to beat Elliott's record, and it expects to begin prepping for the top-speed run on October 9. Scroll down for the full press release below on Ford's latest race effort.