Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford F100 on 2040-cars

Year:1956 Mileage:250 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:223 6 cylinder
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: F10V6L11987 Year: 1956
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Drive Type: Manual
Mileage: 250
Exterior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Black
Trim: Regular Cab
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Missing bed floorBed has crack, holes and dentsInterior door and window handles are strippedNormal wear and tear for a 1956 truck"

1956 F100 I bought about a year ago that I was wanting to have restored but instead I bought a completely restored early bronco so this needs to go. Arizona truck not a lot of rust except a hole at drip rail center of cab above windshield. Is licensed and runs. I don't drive it much because I have to small boys and it doesn't have seatbelts.  Engine was rebuilt professionally for previous owner along with wiring.  I had engine compression checked out due to me hearing a knock and was told by mechanic that the compression was ok. Drum brakes are good along with all electrical. New Dakota Digital Dash. Seat has been re-upholstered. Previous owner had a 5in drop axle on it but I removed it for better handling (you can have if you want). There is a lot I'm missing but I had to quit procrastinating and get this listed. Let me know if you need any specific pics or info. Buyer must arrange pickup and I have the right to sell this locally.

Auto Services in Missouri

Wrightway Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8813 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Old-Monroe
Phone: (636) 240-9650

Southwest Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 5345 Southwest Ave, Maplewood
Phone: (314) 776-3355

Smart Buy Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 1045 S Campbell Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Sedalia Power Sports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, All-Terrain Vehicles
Address: 5004 S Limit Ave, Sedalia
Phone: (660) 829-1829

Raymond Smith Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Glass-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 505 E US Highway 136, Albany
Phone: (660) 726-3223

Payless Car Care Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 605 SW State Route 7, Greenwood
Phone: (816) 229-1997

Auto blog

Next Lincoln Navigator to drop V8 in favor of V6, but Ford Expedition might get both

Tue, 12 Mar 2013

A great many buyers fled from full-size body-on-frame SUVs to car-based crossovers in large measure to save fuel. But that doesn't mean there's still not a buying audience for more traditional truck-based utility vehicles, and those consumers doubtlessly wouldn't mind saving some dollars at the pump, too. According to Motor Trend, those shoppers might be in luck.
That's because the magazine has confirmed that Ford isn't walking away from the full-size SUV segment, and it's poised to do something about its offerings' economy ratings, too. According to MT, global Lincoln director Matt VanDyke has hinted that the next Navigator may drop two cylinders and go with a V6 model - the current model gets just 14 miles per gallon in the city and 20 on the highway from its 5.4-liter V8. The obvious fitment would be Ford's 3.5-liter twin-turbo EcoBoost V6, an engine that has spread like kudzu throughout the rest of the Blue Oval's large vehicle lineup.
Downsized turbocharged engines like Ford's EcoBoost franchise have come under fire as of late for not delivering their EPA fuel economy ratings, but their benefits extend beyond consumption - the 3.5L offers superior power and a better torque curve than the naturally aspirated V8. MT also suggests that Ford's 3.7-liter V6 could form the base engine for the next Navi - it has similar horsepower but a lot less torque than the current 5.4L. That may be less of a problem with the next generation tipped to go on a diet, which could level the playing field somewhat.

2015 Ford Mustang: Obsessively covered [w/videos + poll]

Thu, 05 Dec 2013

Here at Autoblog, we've officially stamped December 5, 2013, as Ford Mustang Day. Sure, the sixth-generation Pony Car started leaking out onto the web days ago, but all of the official, non-embargoed hotness has come out today. And man, there's been a lot.
In terms of new car debuts, this is a really big one - not unlike all of the Corvette madness that kicked off the 2013 automotive season. So to make sure you haven't missed anything, here's a wrap-up of everything you need to know about the 2015 Ford Mustang.
Deep Dive: 2015 Ford Mustang

Consumer Reports: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013

Waiting for a Ford compliment from Consumer Reports these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the 2013 Ford Fusion when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter EcoBoost and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we aren't too surprised by some of the findings, they're still interesting nonetheless.
CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its MyFord Touch, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.
Other Ford products tested this time around include the Focus Electric and C-Max Hybrid. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.