1966 Ford F100 Pickup Truck on 2040-cars
Parker, Colorado, United States
This truck was painted about 10 years ago by the previous owner. He claims he replaced the engine with a rebuilt one about 20K miles ago. There are small scratches here and there but nothing big. Truck has been in Colorado and has almost no rust. The wood in the bed is original and could be continued to use as is. I have the truck insured with Hagerty for $12,000 replacement value. The heater is not hooked up right now but all the parts seem to be there. I would advise the new owner to replace the door insulation as it howls when you get the truck up to about 40 miles per hour. I would encourage anyone interested to come out and look it over and take a drive before making a bid. Call me at 720-427-6565 to set something up. It could use a tune up as it has a rough idle. I will try to fix this before the auction ends. As far as I know I am the third owner. The truck shows 59K miles but I do not know what the actual miles are. The truck has stored in a dry barn.
I have a reasonable "Buy it Now" price which will disappear when my reserve is reached. If you are interested the "Buy it Now" may be the least expensive way to buy this truck. |
Ford F-100 for Sale
1954 ford f-100, pick up, street rod!!!!(US $19,500.00)
1953 ford f100
1968 ford f100 shop truck 390 stroker rat hot rod
1952 ford f1, hot rod, built 351w, dart iron eagle heads, aod, narrowed 9" 4link
1958 ford f100 big back window pickup(US $2,200.00)
1968 ford f100 - swb 2wd - perfect patina, ratrod truck(US $1,200.00)
Auto Services in Colorado
We are West Vail Shell ★★★★★
Vanatta Auto Electric ★★★★★
Tim`s Transmission & Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Colorado Springs Nissan ★★★★★
Santos Muffler Auto ★★★★★
RV Four Seasons ★★★★★
Auto blog
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
Ford Australia debuts Ranger-based Everest SUV concept
Tue, 13 Aug 2013Ford has been in hot water in Australia ever since it announced plans to end local production of the Falcon and Territory SUV. Besides canceling a model that is to Oz what the Mustang is to America, the end of production means more than a few folks will be out of work.
Keen to prove that it has a plan for the market, Ford has unveiled the Aussie-penned Everest Concept, a rough-and-tumble, seven-seat SUV. While not a direct replacement for the aging Territory (that role will eventually be filled by either the Edge or Flex, according to Car Advice) it's an indication from Ford's brass that the Blue Oval is still committed to Australia.
To prove that fact, Alan Mullaly, Mark Fields, Jim Farley and regional execs descended on Sydney for the debut of the new concept. Ford's Australian president and CEO, Bob Graziano, said of the Everest, "Our customers, our employees and Australia can be assured that we're connected to the nation and committed to our customers through terrific products with class-leading technologies."
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E, Volvo XC40 Recharge score high in IIHS tests
Thu, Apr 22 2021New electric cars continue their streak of impressive crash test results. The two latest to go through Insurance Institute for Highway Safety testing are the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E and the 2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge. The former earned a Top Safety Pick award, and the latter picked up the Top Safety Pick+ commendation. Both vehicles got the top "Good" rating in every crash test, as well as the "Superior" rating for vehicle-to-vehicle collision prevention. They deviate when it comes to headlights and vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention. Because the Volvo has headlights rated "Good" on all trims, it got that extra "+" on its Top Safety Pick award. The Ford also has high-rated headlights available, but the standard units got the second lowest rating of "Marginal." As for the vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention, the Volvo received the second-highest "Advanced" rating, while the Ford was rated "Superior." Among the electric cars IIHS has tested, the Ford and Volvo continue a streak of high scores. The organization has evaluated the Audi E-Tron in both its body styles, as well as the Tesla Model 3, both of which get the Top Safety Pick+ rating. As a result of the XC40 Recharge's test score, Volvo pointed out that it is the only automaker whose entire lineup has received a Top Safety Pick+ rating. Related video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.