1955 Ford F100 4x4 1983 Chevy Chasiss on 2040-cars
Point Pleasant, West Virginia, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:350
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Trim: GREY
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: CHEVY 4X4
Mileage: 999,999
Exterior Color: Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
I HAVE FOR SALE A 1955 FORD PICK-UP SITTING ON A 1983 CHEVY CHASSIS. IT HAS THE 83 350 MOTOR AND AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION AND TRANSFER CASE ALL FROM THE SAME BLAZER. I AM SELLING THIS TRUCK FOR A FRIEND. I HAVE DROVE IT A COUPLE OF TIMES IT RUNS AND DRIVES GOOD. I SEE NO PROBLEMS DRIVING IT HOME. THE BODY IS A 55 FORD PICK-UP THE HOOD RAISES BY HYDRAULICS THIS IS A OLDER BUILD I DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG AGO IT HAS BEEN THIS IS THE WAY HE GOT THE TRUCK. I HAVE LOOKED IT OVER THE BEST I COULD IT HAS BEEN WELL DONE. IT DOES NEED DOOR GLASS BOTH OF THOSE ARE MISSING. OVER ALL WITH A LITTLE BIT OF YOUR OWN TOUCHES IT WOULD MAKE A NICE VEHICLE THAT WOULD TURN HEADS. IT HAS CHEVY TRUCK RALLIES WITH 35 1050 15 INCH TIRES AND THE FENDER WELLS HAS BEEN CUT OUT AND A VERY NICE JOB DOING IT. THE TRUCK SHIFTS GOOD AND FOUR WHEEL DRIVE WORKS GOOD. A FEW DAYS AGO I HAD CONTACTED THE OWNER WHO ORIGINALLY BUILT THIS TRUCK HE SAID HE HAD SPENT A LOT OF MONEY BUILDING THIS TRUCK HE FIRST BOUGHT IT WITH THE CAB AND BED ONLY SETTING ON THE BLAZER FRAME. HE HAD TO PUT THE REST OF THE TRUCK TOGETHER. HE SAID THE GRILL IS A 1954 THAT DIDN'T COME WITH THE TRUCK. HE HAD BOTH TITLES TO THIS TRUCK ONE WAS A 1955 FORD TRUCK TITLE THAT WENT TO THE BODY THE OTHER WAS A 1983 TITLE THAT WENT TO THE BLAZER. TO MAKE THIS TRUCK COMPLETELY LEGAL HE COULD NOT USE THE 1955 TITLE. THE TRUCK WAS BUILT IN W.V. HE TOOK BOTH TITLES TO THE DMV THE 1983 TITLE OVER RODE THE 1955 TITLE THE TRUCK WAS INSPECTED AND WAS GIVEN A W.V. 1983 ASM (SELF ASSEMBLED) TITLE WITH THE 1955 CAB VIN NUMBER. THIS TITLE IS NOT RECONSTRUCTED. MY FRIEND BOUGHT THIS TRUCK FROM THE MAN IN W.V. AND TOOK IT TO OHIO. SO THIS TRUCK WENT THROUGH THE SECOND STATE INSPECTION. HE WAS GIVEN A CLEAR OHIO ASM TITLE. THAT IS IN HIS NAME HE IS THE OWNER OF THIS TRUCK. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS TITLE PLEASE LET ME KNOW BEFORE BIDDING. THIS TRUCK IS ADVERTISED LOCAL SO WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMOVE IT AT ANYTIME. THE RESERVE PRICE IS VERY FAIR. HE IS ASKING FOR A $500.00 NON-REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT WITHIN 5 DAYS THE TRUCK MUST BE PAID IN FULL AND PICKED UP WITHIN 14 DAYS UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE. ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL (304)675-5863 THANKS FOR BIDDING
On Jul-15-13 at 19:19:45 PDT, seller added the following information:
I HAVE A FRIEND THAT WILL DELIVER THIS TRUCK 500 MILES OR SO FOR A SMALL FEE. HE WOULD BE ABLE TO BRING IT TO YOUR DOOR WITH ALL PAPER WORK IN HAND. THANKS
Ford F-100 for Sale
Auto Services in West Virginia
Winchester Discount Audio ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Clinic ★★★★★
Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★
Stine`s Alignment ★★★★★
P W Auto Sales & Service ★★★★★
Lehosit Pre-Owned Motors ★★★★★
Auto blog
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.
8 automakers, 15 utilities collaborate on open smart-charging for EVs
Thu, Jul 31 2014We're going to lead with General Motors here. GM is one of eight automakers working with 15 utilities and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) at developing a "smart" plug-in vehicle charging system. Why did we start with GM? Because it's the first automaker whose press release we read that mentioned the other seven automakers. Points for sharing. For the record, the collaboration also includes BMW, Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Honda, Chrysler, Mitsubishi and Ford. The utilities include DTE Energy, Duke Energy, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric. The idea is to develop a so-called "demand charging" system in which an integrated system lets the plug-ins and utilities communicate with each other so that vehicle charging is cut back at peak hours, when energy is most expensive, and ramped up when the rates drop. Such entities say there's a sense of urgency to develop such a system because the number of plug-in vehicles on US roads totals more than 225,000 today and is climbing steadily. There's a lot of technology involved, obviously, but the goal is to have an open platform that's compatible with virtually any automaker's plug-in vehicle. No timeframe was disclosed for when such a system could go live but you can find a press release from EPRI below. EPRI, Utilities, Auto Manufacturers to Create an Open Grid Integration Platform for Plug-in Electric Vehicles PALO ALTO, Calif. (July 29, 2014) – The Electric Power Research Institute, 8 automakers and 15 utilities are working to develop and demonstrate an open platform that would integrate plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) with smart grid technologies enabling utilities to support PEV charging regardless of location. The platform will allow manufacturers to offer a customer-friendly interface through which PEV drivers can more easily participate in utility PEV programs, such as rates for off-peak or nighttime charging. The portal for the system would be a utility's communications system and an electric vehicle's telematics system. As the electric grid evolves with smarter functionality, electric vehicles can serve as a distributed energy resource to support grid reliability, stability and efficiency. With more than 225,000 plug-in vehicles on U.S. roads -- and their numbers growing -- they are likely to play a significant role in electricity demand side management.
Ford, Volvo top 2014 EyesOn Design awards
Fri, 17 Jan 2014Each year at the Detroit Auto Show, the top vehicle designs are recognized with the prestigious EyesOn Design award for production and concept vehicles. This year, the 32 EyesOn Design judges (comprised of current and former vehicle designers including Chrysler designer and SRT president Ralph Gilles, Kia designer Peter Schreyer and retired General Motors designer Wayne Cherry) handed out three awards for the Best Concept Vehicle, Best Production Vehicle and Innovative Use of Color, Graphics, and Materials.
Beating out the Mercedes C-Class and Ford F-150, the 2015 Ford Mustang was named the Best Production Vehicle as the top auto show debut at this year's Detroit show. The 2014 Volvo Concept XC Coupe took home awards as the Best Concept Vehicle and for its Innovative Use of Color, Graphics and Materials.
Considering the Volvo's primer grey hue and subtle orange accents, it was a rather surprising winner for Innovative Use of Color, Graphics, and Materials over flashier concepts like the Toyota FT-1 and our Editors' Choice top pick, the Kia GT4 Stinger. Other vehicles in the running for the concept car award include the GT4 Stinger and Audi Allroad Shooting Brake