2010 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer on 2040-cars
2651 West Main, Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Engine:4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMEU7EE6AUB13044
Stock Num: 14214B
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer Eddie Bauer
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Dark Copper Metallic
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 46321
This outstanding example of a 2010 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer is offered by Inskeep Ford. Why gamble on purchasing a pre-owned vehicle when you can get a CARFAX Buyback Guarantee for free from Inskeep Ford. Reliability is something you can count on when you purchase a Certified Pre-Owned vehicle like this Explorer Eddie Bauer. This SUV is a superb example of what a tough, work focused vehicle should be. Exceptional towing, acceleration and torque will help you get the job done. This 4WD-equipped Ford will handle beautifully on any terrain and in any weather condition your may find yourself in. The benefits of driving a 4 wheel drive vehicle, such as this Explorer Eddie Bauer, include superior acceleration, improved steering, and increased traction and stability. Gently driven doesn't even begin to explain how lovingly cared for this ultra-low mileage vehicle has been. This Ford includes: BLACK, LEATHER HEATED LOW BACK FRONT SPORT BUCKET SEATS 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/OD More information about the 2010 Ford Explorer: The 2010 Explorer has the passenger-carrying capabilities of a mid-sized SUV combined with strong towing and off-road capabilities. Safety equipment includes standard stability control with a rollover sensor, as well as Ford's Trailer Sway Control, which works to keep a towed trailer in line once it begins to pitch. The Explorer also offers third-row seating for additional passenger capacity. The base rear-wheel-drive XLT starts under $30,000. Interesting features of this model are Standard safety equipment list, quiet cabin, and city driving comfort matched with towing and off-road capability. Relax, it's Covered. It's Ford Certified. After passing a rigorous 172 point inspection is a pre-owned vehicle Ford certified, complete with limited warranty coverage and 24-hour roadside assistance. 5 key points to CPO *7-year/100,000-mile Ford powertrain coverage *12-month/12,000-mile Ford limited warranty coverage* 172-point inspection by factory-tra Inskeep Ford is a three time Presidents Award Winning Dealership. We also have an Award winning service department with Ford Certified Technicians. We carry a large line of Pre-Owned vehicles. All payments listed are with approved credit, some restrictions apply. Need more information? Please call 888-238-0940 or visit our web site www.inskeepford.com
Ford Explorer Sport for Sale
2012 ford explorer xlt(US $28,985.00)
2013 ford explorer limited(US $45,190.00)
2010 ford explorer xlt(US $16,988.00)
2013 ford explorer xlt(US $32,985.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $34,900.00)
2014 ford explorer limited(US $40,998.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Vawter`s Automotive Service ★★★★★
Usa Muffler Shops ★★★★★
USA Muffler & Brakes ★★★★★
Twin City Upholstery Ltd. ★★★★★
Tire Central Avon ★★★★★
Taylorsville Tire Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
10 of 18 midsize SUVs earn 'good' IIHS side impact safety rating
Wed, May 18 2022It's not terribly surprising that midsize SUVs earned better safety ratings than small SUVs in the latest side-impact tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Just how much better they scored, on the other hand, certainly raises an eyebrow. Ten out of 18 midsize SUVs earned the highest rating of 'good' in the stringent new test, altered for vehicles starting with the 2020 model year with a heavier barrier (4,200 pounds) that moves at a higher speed (37 miles per hour) and is fitted with a hard honeycomb frontal structure. By way of contrast, just one out of of 20 small SUVs earned a 'good' score. SUVs that receiving 'good' scores were the Ford Explorer, Infiniti QX60, Lincoln Aviator, Mazda CX-9, Nissan Pathfinder, Subaru Ascent, Toyota Highlander, Volkswagen Atlas, Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport and Volkswagen ID.4. For EV fans, it's worth noting the ID.4 was the only electric vehicle included in the test. The Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse scraped away with 'acceptable' ratings while the Honda Passport, Honda Pilot, Hyundai Palisade, Jeep Wrangler 4-door, Kia Telluride and Nissan Murano were deemed merely 'marginal' in the tough new test. Only two models — the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen ID.4 — earned a "Good" rating in every test category. Interestingly, the Jeep Wrangler would have scored a 'good' rating if it were equipped with side airbags for the rear seating positions. It would likely be an engineering challenge to equip its removable top and/or doors with airbags, but the lack of that safety feature allowed the head of the rear passenger dummy to hit the vertical support of the top. Otherwise, the Wrangler scored good ratings across the board. The new Ford Bronco, which makes more allowances for side-impact safety, has not yet been tested. The popular Hyundai Palisade and Kia Telluride SUVs stand out in the test with 'poor' ratings for driver pelvis injuries. The Nissan Murano, a vehicle last redesigned for the 2015 model year, was the only vehicle tested that received a 'poor' rating for its structure and safety cage. Videos of the tests of 12 of these 18 SUVs can be found on the IIHS' YouTube page. Related video: Green Buick Chevrolet Ford Honda Hyundai Infiniti Jeep Kia Mazda Nissan Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Safety Crossover SUV IIHS Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:
2014 Ford Fiesta 1.0L EcoBoost
Fri, 09 May 2014I'll be honest; when Ford first unveiled its 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, I was skeptical. Past attempts at building turbocharged American cars were almost universally awful, I reasoned, so why would Ford's latest effort be any different? This may seem foolish today, considering the success that the growing EcoBoost range has achieved - particularly the 2.0-liter and 1.6-liter mills. Yet I once again found myself questioning Ford.
It's the makeup of the 1.0-liter, turbocharged three-cylinder slotted into the compact engine bay of this Fiesta that has a way of breeding doubt. Three-cylinder engines remain an extreme rarity in the US. What's more, they earned a less-than-desirable reputation for applications in the 1980s and 1990s, and my trepidation about this latest three-pot as a result.
As I found out, though, history is a poor informant of modern technology. The thrust available in other cars with the EcoBoost badge on the back has not gone missing here; something the International Engine of the Year committee has lauded. That august body named the 1.0-liter Ecoboost the best engine of 2012 and 2013. After a week of driving, it didn't take long for my fear of threes to get turned into something like that line of thinking.