Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Expedition El Limited on 2040-cars

US $47,980.00
Year:2013 Mileage:22822 Color: Red
Location:

1300 US Highway 31 S., Greenwood, Indiana, United States

1300 US Highway 31 S., Greenwood, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.4L V8 24V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Certified Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMJK2A50DEF01768
Stock Num: P1569A
Make: Ford
Model: Expedition EL Limited
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 1st
  • 2nd and 3rd row head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • 60-40 Third Row Seat
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Braking Assist
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Digital Audio Input
  • digital keypad power door locks
  • Driver and passenger heated-cushion
  • driver and passenger heated-seatback
  • Driver seat memory
  • Driver's side electrochromatic auto-dimming mirrors
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 13 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 18 mpg
  • HD auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Leather
  • Leather shift knob trim
  • Leather/genuine wood steering wheel trim
  • Machined aluminum rims
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.6 s
  • Memorized Settings for 2 drivers
  • Memorized Settings including door mirror(s)
  • Memorized Settings including pedals
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-source Rear Audio System
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power Adjustable Pedals
  • Power Folding Third Row Seat
  • Power liftgate
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power retractable mirrors
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear air conditioning with separate controls
  • Rear heat ducts with separate controls
  • Remote
  • Roof rack
  • Running boards
  • Side airbag
  • Simulated wood/metal-look center console trim
  • Simulated wood/metal-look dash trim
  • Simulated wood/metal-look door trim
  • SiriusXM AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio(TM)
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Surround Audio
  • SYNC
  • Tachometer
  • Total Number of Speakers: 7
  • Trailer hitch
  • Trip computer
  • Turn signal in mirrors
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheel Diameter: 18
  • Wheel Width: 8.5
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 22822

All Around gem! This gas-saving Expedition EL will get you where you need to go.. Ford has outdone itself with this do-it-all SUV*** Ford CERTIFIED! This impressive 2013 Ford Expedition EL Limited, with its grippy 4WD, will handle anything mother nature decides to throw at you*** Safety equipment includes: ABS, Traction control, Curtain airbags, Passenger Airbag, Front fog/driving lights...FEATURES INCLUDE: CD player, DVD Player, Heated Seats, Leather Seats, Memory Driver's Seat...Ford Certified Pre-Owned means that you not only get the reassurance of a 12Mo/12,000 Mile Comprehensive Warranty, but also up to a 7-Year/100,000-Mile Powertrain Limited Warranty, a 172-point inspection/reconditioning, 24hr roadside assistance, trip-interruption services, rental car benefits, and a complete vehicle history report. Please call 888-865-4430 and ask to speak with the Internet Sales Department for the BEST SERVICE!!!

Auto Services in Indiana

West Creek Motor Sports Tire`s ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 9306 W 181st Ave, Lowell
Phone: (219) 690-0611

USA Collision of Price Hill ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4033 Glenway Ave, Lawrenceburg
Phone: (513) 921-2117

Tire Service Plus ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 6313 W Washington St, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 243-0700

Rob`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 4252 State Road 54 W, Springville
Phone: (812) 279-9934

R C Foster Truck Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Tractor Dealers
Address: 1200 W Troy Ave, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 787-2291

Pro Gear Machine ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Accessories
Address: 1306 S Halleck St, Demotte
Phone: (219) 987-7777

Auto blog

2020 Ford Escape hybrids vs other crossover fuel sippers: How they compare on paper

Wed, Apr 3 2019

Along with a new generation of Escape, Ford also reintroduced the world to the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid. And if that weren't enough, Ford is adding a plug-in hybrid version. This is a sign of the times: people are more crossover crazy than ever, but are also seeking ways to use less fuel, whether it's for environmental or purely money-motivated reasons. The Ford hybrids aren't the only fuel-efficient compact crossovers on the market. They will be going head-to-head with conventional hybrids including the 2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. There are other plug-in hybrids including the 2019 Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the plug-in version of the 2019 Kia Niro. There are even a couple diesels in the form of the 2019 Chevy Equinox and 2019 GMC Terrain. So we've rounded up the details on all these crossovers to see who leads and lags in criteria such as power, fuel efficiency, space and price. Check out all their details below. 2019 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid View 68 Photos How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Conventional Hybrids and Diesels Let's face it, if you're buying one of these crossovers, one of the things that matters most to you is just how frugal with fuel they are. We'll start off with the conventional hybrids and diesels, and the clear victor is the Kia Niro, which in base FE trim, manages to hit 50 mpg combined. This is thanks to it sharing its powertrain with the Hyundai Ioniq, the Hyundai equivalent of the Toyota Prius. Buyers should take note that only the FE returns such high fuel economy. The LX and EX drop to 49 mpg, and the S Touring and Touring get 43. Even then, the least efficient Niro is the most efficient of the normal hybrids and diesels. It is nearly the least powerful, though, with 139 horsepower. Just behind it is the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. It delivers 40 mpg combined, and it has an ace up its sleeve: it comes standard with all-wheel drive. Every other vehicle in this powertrain group has front drive standard, and the Niro isn't available with all-wheel drive at all. If that weren't enough, the RAV4 Hybrid also boasts the most power at 219 horses. While we can't say anything about Escape Hybrid fuel economy, we do know that it will make 198 horsepower, which is close to the class-leading RAV4. The least powerful of these is the Equinox and Terrain, and they return the worst fuel economy at 32 mpg.

Ford recalls 83k Taurus and crossover models for halfshaft issue

Fri, 15 Aug 2014

Ford and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have issued a recall for some 83,250 vehicles in the US, for an issue with halfshafts. More specifically a "halfshaft retention circlip" might not have been properly installed on affected vehicles, with the result being halfshafts that may move improperly or disengage completely from the linkshaft while driving. The NHTSA release also notes that the issue may occur "without prior warning" which obviously factors in to the timeliness of getting this checked.
Should the halfshaft disengage, a few troubling things could happen. If it occurs while driving, power from the engine will no longer be transmitted to the wheels. And, if the vehicle is parked without the parking brake applied after disengagement of the circlip, vehicles may roll away even if they're transmissions have been placed in "Park."
Affected vehicles are as follows: Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX crossovers from model years 2012 to 2014; Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS sedans from model years 2013 to 2014; Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles from model years 2013 to 2014.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.