Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Ford Econoline E250 Ffvcargo Van,v8-4.6l,runs New And Clean on 2040-cars

US $6,900.00
Year:2009 Mileage:239900 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Dealer
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:8
Body Type:Minivan/Van
VIN: 1FTNE24W29DA37462 Make: Ford
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected (include details in your description)
Model: E-Series Van
Year: 2009
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 239,900
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Interior Color: Gray
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: E250 FFV
Exterior Color: White
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Wayne Carl Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 326 W Ridge Pike, Linfield
Phone: (610) 489-7153

Union Fuel Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Fuel Economizers
Address: 700 Bushkill Dr, Wind-Gap
Phone: (610) 253-6215

Tint It Is Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 6230 Greenway Ave, Folsom
Phone: (215) 724-8886

Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Beveled, Carved, Etched, Ornamental, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: West-Alexander
Phone: (724) 523-6553

Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 6314 State Route 30, Creighton
Phone: (724) 523-6553

Syrena International Ltd ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 691 Bethlehem Pike, Foxcroft-Square
Phone: (215) 361-0500

Auto blog

Ford Mustang GT500 successor spied near SVT

Tue, 17 Sep 2013

Details about the next-gen Ford Mustang are scarce, and there's even less information out there about the upcoming replacement for the Shelby GT500. Previously rumored to drop the Shelby name and wear the GT350 moniker, the highest-performance Mustang has just been spotted testing near Ford's SVT operations.
Despite being cloaked in heavy camouflage, we can instantly tell this prototype is different from other Mustang spy shots we've seen in the past. Aside from the Shelby-spec wheels, quad exhaust outlets (previous spy shots show only two) and beefier brakes, this car also has air intakes on the hood and front fenders. These elements help to neither prove nor dismiss rumors that the next SVT Mustang will be naturally aspirated. It also looks like Ford is may be planning some changes to this car's rear suspension, as there is some extra camouflage added beneath the rear end of this prototype.
As a bonus, these spy shots also give us our first look inside the new Mustang, revealing a new steering wheel (with more buttons) and a glimpse of the dual-pod instrument gauges. Check out past spy shots of the 2015 Mustang showing off its new face and driving around town.

Ford unveils Mustang 50th anniversary logo, plans merchandise

Tue, 26 Mar 2013

The Ford Mustang turns 50 years old this year, and this is the logo that will announce the milestone occasion on a special line of merchandise. The graphic is the result of an internal design competition, and Ford will give 50 different companies the license to use it on traditional logo merchandise like shirts and watches, along with some untraditional items like pinball machines.
Ford is going to begin the celebrations at this week's New York Auto Show and continue them throughout the year, but April 17 is the official birthday of the the pony car that just won't quit. You can expect to start seeing anniversary merchandise in the next couple of weeks.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.