2002 Ford E350 Cargo Van 7.3l Powerstroke Turbo Diesel Only 74k Miles No Reserve on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:CARGO VAN
Engine:7.3L POWERSTROKE TURBO DIESEL
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Used
Year: 2002
Number of Cylinders: 8 7.3L POWERSTROKE TURBO DIESEL
Make: Ford
Model: E-Series Van
Trim: CARGO VAN 7.3K POWERSTROKE TURBO DIESEL
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Drive Type: 2WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 74,210
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: CARGO VAN 7.3L
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
2002 FORD E350 SUPER DUTY CARGO VAN WITH 7.3L POWERSTROKE TURBO DIESEL ENGINE AND AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION WITH ONLY 74K MILES. HAS HONDA AIR COMPRESSOR. MECHANICALLY THIS VAN IS IN GREAT CONDITION. THE ENGINE RUNS PERFECT AND AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SHIFTS SMOOTHLY. HAS GOOD TIRES ALL AROUND. VERY DEPENDABLE AND ROAD WORTHY TRUCK. JUST TURN THE KEYS AND GO ANYWHERE !!! DONT MISS IT !!! THIS IS A VERY GOOD VAN WITH SUPER LOW MILES !!! THIS IS A NO RESERVE AUCTION AND THIS TRUCK MUST BE SOLD TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER !!! This vehicle is being SOLD AS-IS, where is with no warranty, expressed written or implied.The seller shall not be responsible for the correct description, authenticity, genuineness, or defects herein, and makes no warranty in connection therewith. No allowance or set aside will be made on account of any incorrectness, imperfection, defect or damage. Any descriptions or representations are for identification purposes only and are not to be construed as a warranty of any type. It is the responsibility of the buyer to have thoroughly inspected the vehicle, and to have satisfied himself or herself as to the condition and value and to bid based upon that judgement solely. The seller shall and will make every reasonable effort to disclose any known defects associated with this vehicle at the buyer's request prior to the close of sale. Seller assumes no responsibility for any repairs regardless of any oral statements about the vehicle. Terms & Conditions A $250.00 processing fee will be added to the total value of the auction.This is a buyers responsibility to make all transportation arrangements.Please don't bid if funds are not available at the time of bidding. Pennsylvania buyers must pay sales tax and tag fees. Out-of-state buyers are responsible for their own taxes in their own states.FULL PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED IN 3 DAYS !!! WE ACCEPT CERTIFIED BANK CHECK OR BANK TO BANK WIRE TRANSFER !!! NO PAY PAL !!! BUYER MUST CONTACT US WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE AUCTION IS END !!! |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
2009 ford e-150 handicap cargo van lift(US $20,997.00)
2013 ford e-series side entry wheelchair accessible handicapped conversion van
2008 ford e-450 super duty base cutaway van 2-door 6.0l(US $13,495.00)
Ford bus 2004 e-350 super duty 5.4 l gas 14 passengers(US $4,995.00)
1998 ford e-350 econoline xl cutaway van 2-door 7.3l
2012 used 5.4l v8 16v automatic rwd 15 passenger
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★
Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★
United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★
Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★
Team One Auto Group ★★★★★
Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
J Mays' legacy
Fri, 15 Nov 2013
Mays is by far not the first designer to use heritage design cues in his work.
The announcement that J Mays will be leaving his chief creative officer role at Ford Motor Company on January 1 ends a 13-year run in one of the industry's top design roles. While best known for having a hand in reborn classics like the Volkswagen New Beetle, Ford Mustang and Thunderbird (above), Mays' legacy is more complicated and nuanced than being considered the father of what is known as "retrofuturism".
We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton
Tue, Jul 14 2020The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender. Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys. As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more. On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.
Toyota tops Consumer Reports best, worst used car values
Tue, 18 Mar 2014We often mock Toyota for building boring, soulless cars, but a new study by Consumer Reports suggests that regardless of whether that's true, the company has some of the best used cars on the market. In its report on used cars from 2004-2013, the Japanese automaker had 11 vehicles among its brands on the list - more than any other automaker.
CR breaks the list down by cost and vehicle size, and Toyota has at least one entry at every price point and in nearly every segment. To score a recommendation, a vehicle had to perform well in the magazine's initial tests and score above-average reliability results. It also tried to only suggest cars with electronic stability control. Of the 28 recommended vehicles, Honda/Acura had the second most mentions at six, and Ford, Hyundai and Subaru managed two each.
The Detroit brands also made it to the list, but not in a positive way. Consumer Reports compiled a list of 22 vehicles it wouldn't recommend because "they have multiple years of much-worse-than-average overall reliability." General Motors had the most unrecommended models on the list at six, but Chrysler and Ford weren't far behind, with five cars each from their brands not making the grade. The full list of recommendations is available on CR's website.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.103 s, 7821 u