Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

White 1999 Ford Crown Victoria on 2040-cars

US $3,000.00
Year:1999 Mileage:135000
Location:

Washington, District Of Columbia, United States

Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
Advertising:

Same owner since 2006. Minor accident to front right in 07. The car maintenance is up to date and it is mechanically sound, I would drive it anywhere!  

Asking price of $3000.00 willing to hear and / accept comparable offers. 

PICKUP ONLY!!!!!

  Any further questions text or call 240-468-3564.

Auto Services in District Of Columbia

Town Car Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 301 S Glebe Rd, Naval-Anacost-Annex
Phone: (703) 920-7887

Bingo Tire & Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 416 Hume Ave, Anacostia
Phone: (703) 548-0333

355 Rockville ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 15401 Frederick Rd, Chevy-Chase
Phone: (301) 340-0900

Napa Auto Parts - Fairfax Auto Parts Inc ★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Battery Supplies
Address: 8701 Lee Hwy, Fort-Mcnair
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Jack Taylors Signature Cars ★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3750 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Washington-Navy-Yard
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Ballard Foreign Car Repair ★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6615 Central Ave, Washington-Navy-Yard
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

Ford Expedition, F-150 Limited and Cadillac V Series | Autoblog Podcast #583

Fri, Jun 7 2019

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski and Assistant Editor Zac Palmer. First, they talk about the cars they've been driving, including the Ford Expedition, Ford F-150 Limited and the Mini Cooper JCW Knights Edition. Then they discuss the news, including Ian Callum stepping down from Jaguar, Cadillac's V cars and the latest in the saga between FCA and Renault. Autoblog Podcast #583 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving: Ford Expedition Ford F-150 Limited Mini Cooper JCW Knights Edition Ian Callum resigns from Jaguar Cadillac V FCA backs down from Renault merger talks Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:

New 2020 Ford Explorer, Lincoln Aviator recalled for minor safety issues

Wed, Aug 7 2019

Ford has announced a small recall on 2020 Explorers and 2020 Lincoln Aviators. Select units might be missing a manual park release cover, while others might have instrument clusters stuck in Factory Mode. The recall affects 14,135 SUVs in total.  While a vehicle is in production in a manufacturing facility, Ford might put them in what is known as Factory Mode to help reduce battery drain. Affecting the instrument cluster, this mode disables warning alerts, warning chimes, and does not show the PRNDL gear selector display. Ford says one vehicle was in an accident at a production facility as a result of the issue, but nobody was injured.  Separately, Ford found that some of these Explorers and Aviators might be lacking a manual park release cover. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards require a manual park release cover that is only removable with a tool. Without the cover, there is a very minor chance the manual park release could be accidentally actuated, which could allow the vehicle to move on its own.  The recalls affect 13,896 vehicles in the U.S. and 239 in Canada. The Explorers were built between March 27, 2019, and July 24, 2019. The Aviators were built between April 10, 2019, and July 24, 2019. Owners can use Ford's recall number 19C06, and if affected, can take their vehicles in for fixes.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.