Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Ford Crown Victoria Ex Police Car Interceptor Package Govt. Surplus-va. on 2040-cars

Year:2004 Mileage:127655 Color: Blue
Location:

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Manassas, Virginia, United States
2004 FORD CROWN VICTORIA EX POLICE CAR INTERCEPTOR PACKAGE GOVT. SURPLUS-VA., image 1
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 2FAHP71W74X177524 Year: 2004
Make: Ford
Model: Crown Victoria
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 127,655
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: Police Interceptor
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"USED GOVERNMENT SURPLUS-PRINCE WILLIAM CO. VIRGINIA"

Auto Services in Virginia

Williamsburg Honda-Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 7277 Richmond Rd, Wicomico
Phone: (757) 564-9700

Webb`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 9092 Euclid Ave, Manassas
Phone: (703) 686-4295

Twins Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2700 Nine Mile Rd, University-Of-Richmond
Phone: (804) 643-0962

Transmissions Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 11239 Jefferson Ave, Langley-Afb
Phone: (757) 596-3883

Sweden Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4909 Trade Center Dr, Snell
Phone: (540) 834-4067

Surratt Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Tire Dealers
Address: 712 Richmond Ave, Churchville
Phone: (540) 886-1160

Auto blog

Project Ugly Horse: Part VI

Thu, 21 Mar 2013

Solid axle? What solid axle?
I was fully prepared to embark on a seven-day journey down a rabbit hole of broken bolts, internet hearsay and consternation.
This should not have gone this easily. Having a long and checkered history of simple projects punctuated by much wailing and gnashing of knuckles, I was fully prepared to embark on a seven-day journey down a rabbit hole of broken bolts, internet hearsay and consternation when I finally decided to lay hands on the '89 Mustang with the goal of relieving the car of its stock rear axle. Instead, it took less than a full morning's worth of work to carve the old 7.5-inch solid axle from its moorings and mock up something, well, different.

Formula Drift kicks off 11th season on Streets of Long Beach

Tue, 08 Apr 2014

The 2014 Formula Drift series kicked off last weekend in Long Beach, and saw Chris Forsberg, who you'll recall went mad and drifted around a warehouse in an Infiniti M, take the title behind the wheel of his Hankook Tire Nissan 370Z (shown above).
Forsberg really ran away with the first round of competition, outscoring his closest opponent, second-place finisher Kenneth Moen and his Bridges Racing Nissan 240SX, by 20 points. Third place was 2013 championship winner Michael Essa and his Yokohama BMW M3, 30.5 points behind Forsberg.
In the manufacturers' title, Nissan took an early lead with 122 points, which isn't a huge surprise considering five of the top ten drifters were piloting either a Z or a product of the brand's S platform. Ford, which had two drivers (Justin Pawlak and Vaughn Gittin, Jr.) in the top ten, took home second place, while BMW is currently third in the manufacturers' standings.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.