Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1981 Ford Ltd Crown Victoria on 2040-cars

Year:1981 Mileage:67510 Color: Tan /
 Tan
Location:

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.0 L
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FABP35F9BU167588 Year: 1981
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Crown Victoria
Trim: Crown Victoria
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 67,510
Exterior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Tan
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Like brand new! Local Utah car!"

1981 Ford LTD Crown Victoria. 67,510 original miles! This car still has the original paint, top, drive train, and interior. It runs and drives like brand new. All of the power options work perfectly! Lighted vanity mirrors, power windows, locks, antenna, seats. Trip computer, premium sound with built in amplifier, posi-traction, intermittent wipers, auto headlights. remote mirror controls, tilt steering wheel, cruise control, etc...This car has every single option for a 1981 Crown Vic, except for leather seats. The overdrive transmission makes it a really nice and economical freeway cruiser. The Bridgestone tires have about 500 miles on them, they are less than two years old. The spokes are like new. The trunk looks like the day it left the factory. The A/C is functioning but it's blowing warm. I have performed a lube/oil/filter and a thorough detail inside and out on this beautiful automobile. But I will let the pictures of this car speak for themselves.

The reserve set for this car is quite fair. The car is in Salt Lake City, Utah. Zip code 84115. All shipping cost's and arrangements are the sole responsibility of the buyer. Please call me first if you have a (0) feedback score. My number is (801) 541-2307. I am also available to answer any question, anyone might have at this same number. Please bid with the intention of purchasing. These Ebay auctions are legally binding contracts to buy. This is an excellent example of a very well built and successful line of cars Ford built over a span of many decades. Bid with confidence!

 

 

Auto Services in Utah

Tri-City Auto & RV, Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2375 E Middleton Dr, Hurricane
Phone: (435) 652-0702

The Tire Pro`s Tire Factory ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 296 N Bluff St, Oasis
Phone: (435) 767-0497

St George Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Brake Repair
Address: 1130 N Main St, Summit
Phone: (435) 865-1100

Speed Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Racing & Sports Cars
Address: 7586 Redwood Rd, West-Jordan
Phone: (801) 255-5877

Rocky Mountain Tire & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 6158 S State St, West-Jordan
Phone: (801) 269-1616

Reynolds Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 989 N Highway 89, North-Salt-Lake
Phone: (801) 797-9865

Auto blog

NHTSA, IIHS, and 20 automakers to make auto braking standard by 2022

Thu, Mar 17 2016

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and virtually every automaker in the US domestic market have announced a pact to make automatic emergency braking standard by 2022. Here's the full rundown of companies involved: BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo (not to mention the brands that fall under each automaker's respective umbrella). Like we reported yesterday, AEB will be as ubiquitous in the future as traction and stability control are today. But the thing to note here is that this is not a governmental mandate. It's truly an agreement between automakers and the government, a fact that NHTSA claims will lead to widespread adoption three years sooner than a formal rule. That fact in itself should prevent up to 28,000 crashes and 12,000 injuries. The agreement will come into effect in two waves. For the majority of vehicles on the road – those with gross vehicle weights below 8,500 pounds – AEB will need to be standard equipment by September 1, 2022. Vehicles between 8,501 and 10,000 pounds will have an extra three years to offer AEB. "It's an exciting time for vehicle safety. By proactively making emergency braking systems standard equipment on their vehicles, these 20 automakers will help prevent thousands of crashes and save lives," said Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx said in an official statement. "It's a win for safety and a win for consumers." Read on for the official press release from NHTSA. Related Video: U.S. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles McLEAN, Va. – The U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA's 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept 1, 2022. Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Tesla Motors Inc., Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo Car USA.

Ford investing $500M in engine plant for 2.7L EcoBoost production

Sun, 30 Mar 2014

Ohio is a hot area for Ford at the moment with the announcement just a few weeks ago that production of the next-generation F-650/F-750 medium-duty trucks would move from Mexico to the Ohio Assembly Plant in Avon Lake, Ohio. Now, Ford is investing $500 million to hire 300 workers at its Lima Engine Plant in Lima, Ohio, to add production of the twin-turbo 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 for the 2015 F-150.
The latest investment will be used to add a new flexible engine assembly system and renovate 700,000 square feet of the plant for machining and assembly areas. The Lima factory already builds Ford's 3.5-liter and 3.7-liter Duratec V6 engines. The plant opened in 1957, and it's on track to build its 40 millionth engine later this year.
Ford claims that the 2.7-liter EcoBoost will offer V8 performance with better efficiency in the F-150. It comes standard with intelligent stop/start that doesn't activate when the truck is towing or in four-wheel drive, and it's made from a combination of compacted graphite iron and aluminum for low weight and high strength. The company says that V6 engines have already proven popular in the F-150 with 57 percent of trucks in 2014 being equipped with either the naturally aspirated 3.7-liter or turbocharged 3.5-liter EcoBoost engines.

American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings

Fri, 10 May 2013

Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.