Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1979 Ford Bronco Full Size 351 Running At Red With Red Inside on 2040-cars

Year:1979 Mileage:45946 Color: Red /
 Red
Location:

Ephrata, Pennsylvania, United States

Ephrata, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Engine:351
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: U15HLEE1879 Year: 1979
Mileage: 45,946
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Red
Model: Bronco
Interior Color: Red
Trim: RED
Number of Cylinders: 8
Drive Type: 4X4
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

UP FOR AUCTION... ANOTHER BARN FIND.

1979 FORD BRONCO.  
RUNS AND DRIVES, BUT THE BRAKES ARE IN NEED OF WORK.   MUST BE TOWED, CANNOT BE DRIVEN AFTER BOUGHT.
TITLE IS CLEAR AND IN HAND.
MILEAGE SHOULD BE 145,946
4X4 WITH THE DANA 44 HIGH PINION IN THE FRONT, AND THE 9 INCH IN THE BACK
RED WITH RED INTERIOR
THIS CAN BE MADE INTO A SHARP TRUCK WITH SOME TLC.
CHECK THE PHOTOS, AS IS WHERE IS.
EMAIL ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS.   I CAN DELIVER FOR A FUEL FEE.   IM VERY REASONABLE.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Wrek Room ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 717 Brownsville Rd, Boston
Phone: (412) 381-5190

Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Auto Transmission
Address: Donegal
Phone: (412) 923-3219

Warren Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 108 W 12th St, Fairview
Phone: (814) 459-1476

Ultimate Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting, Towing
Address: 100 S Main St, Loganville
Phone: (717) 292-6060

Ulrich Sales & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4340 Morgantown Rd, Narvon
Phone: (610) 856-7050

Tower Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 200 Freeport Rd, Creighton
Phone: (412) 828-6202

Auto blog

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.

Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel, Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid and Tesla Cybertruck | Autoblog Podcast #606

Fri, Dec 6 2019

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Senior Editor, Green, John Beltz Snyder and Associate Editor, Joel Stocksdale. With their powers combined, they create a great episode full of driving impressions from the Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel, Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid and BMW X6 40i. They return to the topic of the Ford Mustang Mach-E before diving into the Tesla Cybertruck and a future without Buick sedans. Finally, they help a listener choose a new, sporty sedan in the "Spend My Money" segment. Autoblog Podcast #606 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving: 2020 Jeep Wrangler EcoDiesel 2019 Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid 2020 BMW X6 40i Ford Mustang Mach-E (Watch the ride-along here) Tesla Cybertruck Bye to Buick sedans Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:    

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.