Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Dodge Ram 3500 Quad Cab Buckets Slt Diesel 4x4 on 2040-cars

US $25,990.00
Year:2009 Mileage:126596 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Walker, Louisiana, United States

Walker, Louisiana, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 3D7MX48L39G510070
Year: 2009
Make: Dodge
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Model: Ram 3500
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 126,596
Sub Model: 4WD Quad Cab
Options: CD Player
Exterior Color: Silver
Power Options: Power Locks
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6

Auto Services in Louisiana

Wiggins Auto Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: Fullerton
Phone: (318) 443-6016

Veteran Windshield Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair
Address: 24 Shady Oaks Dr, Saint-Benedict
Phone: (985) 237-4082

Speed Tires & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 9139 Mansfield Rd, Keithville
Phone: (318) 828-1751

Siegen Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 6888 Siegen Ln, Sorrento
Phone: (225) 234-0532

Sams Audio ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Home Theater Systems, Audio-Visual Creative Services
Address: 6770 W Park Ave, Gray
Phone: (985) 851-3838

Safelite AutoGlass - Bossier City ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 2048 E Texas St, Barksdale-Afb
Phone: (318) 742-1585

Auto blog

Dodge hoping Fast & Furious appearance gives Dart a sales jolt [w/video]

Tue, 28 May 2013

According to Automotive News, Chrysler is hoping Fast & Furious 6 will be kind to the Dodge Dart. While the compact sedan doesn't actually show up in the film, Dodge has partnered up with the movie franchise for a new ad featuring the Dart.
Chrysler hasn't exactly seen the high sales numbers it was originally hoping for with the new sedan, thanks in part to a couple of missteps. For starters, most early-production vehicles were only offered with a manual transmission. Analysts believe Chrysler squandered around 95 percent of potential Dart sales because automatic transmission options weren't immediately available.
Right now, the Dodge Dart rakes 19th among compact cars, pulling down 31,064 sales through April. Last month was the company's strongest, with 8,099 units moving off of dealer lots. Unfortunately, the model has also been handicapped by its older sister, the Avenger. With Chrysler throwing heavy incentives at the aging sedan, many consumers have taken advantage of a better deal with the slightly larger, more powerful Avenger.

This or That: 2005 Dodge Ram SRT-10 vs. 2005 Subaru WRX STI [w/poll]

Thu, May 7 2015

Some cars, due to ultimate desirability, particular rareness, or spectacular performance/prestige eventually become collectible. It's darn near impossible to know which ones will make it into the rarefied stratosphere of collectibility – why is a late 1960s AMC AMX so affordable these days, whereas prices for late '70s Pontiac Trans Ams are soaring? – but there are some useful indicators to keep tabs on. We're not exactly experts on investing, but we do know cars. As such, we've decided to take our non-expertise on one hand, combine it in the other with our knowledge of all things automotive, wad it up, throw it out and ask for your forgiveness. Or something like that. I've challenged Senior Editor Seyth Miersma to choose a car he thinks will become a future collector's item that's not more than 10 years old, and for no more than $25,000. I've done the same, and we vigorously argued for and against each other's picks. I feel good about my choice, but I don't have the best track record in these contests (I've lost three times, won twice, but they've all been pretty close), so, while I'm not going to beg (please vote for me!), I do hope you find my argument convincing. But first, let's hear from Seyth: Miersma: Ten-years old or newer makes this challenging. At that age most vehicles feel like a plain old used car to me, few hit the "classic" button. But the Subaru WRX STI has always been a special car, and the 2005 cutoff year proves to be very attractive for the parameters of our contest. It's rare; with fewer than 5,000 STI models sold that model year. It's probably the best looking WRX STI ever sold in America; narrowly avoiding the dreadful "horse collar" front fascia. And it's got one of the more die-hard car-geek followings out there. For $25,000, you can also still find examples that have reasonable miles, are in good condition, and haven't all been molested by grown-up Initial D wannabes. With the street racers hacking up collectable examples every day, I like my odds for steep appreciation by way of conservation. I couldn't agree more. It really is difficult to predict what cars will catch the eye of collectors, and the WRX STI seems like a pretty good choice. But I think mine is even better, and I can't let him know that I'd love to park just such an STI in my very own garage. And so goes my argument: Korzeniewski: I like your choice as a driver, Seyth. I'm less convinced of its status as a sure-fire collectible.

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.