1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Slt Laramie 4x4 5 Speed 5.9l 12 Valve 6bt Turbo Diesel on 2040-cars
Los Angeles, California, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Manual
Make: Dodge
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Model: Ram 2500
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 233,656
Sub Model: DIESEL 4X4
Options: Cassette Player
Exterior Color: Black
Power Options: Power Locks
Interior Color: Other
Number of Cylinders: 6
Dodge Ram 2500 for Sale
- 2012 ram laramie longhorn(US $47,910.00)
- 2006 ram 2500 4x4 mega cab slt 5.9l cummins turbo diesel auto leather one owner(US $15,980.00)
- 2004 dodge ram 2500 slt 2004.5 cummins turbo diesel 5.9 quad cab loaded 22 mpg!!(US $13,900.00)
- 4x4 reg cab 5.7l cd hemi remote start abs adjustable steering wheel fog lights
- 1998 dodge ram 2500 / 5 spd. manual / 4x4 / quad cab / !!no reserve!!
- 2010 dodge ram 2500 laramie extended crew cab pickup 4-door 6.7l(US $35,000.00)
Auto Services in California
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
Z D Motorsports ★★★★★
Young Automotive ★★★★★
XACT WINDOW TINTING & 3M CLEAR BRA PAINT PROTECTION ★★★★★
Woodland Hills Honda ★★★★★
West Valley Machine Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler recalling 278,222 trucks and SUVs over bad rear axles
Thu, 14 Feb 2013Chrysler has issued a recall of 278,222 light trucks and sport utility vehicles here in the United States. The reason: bad rear axles. Specifically, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the rear axle pinion nut may lack a necessary adhesive patch, which could cause the nut to loosen. If this happens, the axle can lock up, which could cause all sorts of havoc on the road.
This is an expansion of the rear axle recall announced in October of last year, where 44,300 Ram 1500 and Dodge Dakota models were being called in. At that time, 12 accidents had been reported due to the faulty axle pinion nut.
Affected vehicles include Ram 1500 trucks from the 2009 to 2012 model years, Dodge Dakota models from the 2009 to 2011 model years, and both the Chrysler Aspen and Dodge Durango SUV twins, both from the 2009 model year only.
Is Mopar readying a special-edition Dart for Chicago?
Sat, 26 Jan 2013Chrysler has released the above teaser of a limited-edition Mopar 2013 model that will be unveiled at next month's Chicago Auto Show. Although the automaker doesn't announce what vehicle will get the Mopar treatment, closer investigation of the seats and center console suggest that this car will be a special version of the 2013 Dodge Dart.
This will be the fourth Mopar model in as many years, following on the heels of the Mopar 2010 Challenger, Mopar 2011 Charger and the Mopar '2012 300. There are no details for the Mopar '13 Dart, but we do see that the car will retain the signature black-and-blue color scheme as past Mopar editions. Like these previous models, we expect production of Mopar '13 Dart to be limited to just 500 units.
Scroll down for Chrysler's press release teasing the new Mopar model, and we'll be sure to bring you plenty of live images from the show floor in a couple weeks.
25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel
Mon, 10 Mar 2014Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.