2013 Back Up Camera, Cd Player, Satellite Radio, Tint. We Finance 866-428-9374 on 2040-cars
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
Engine:4
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Dodge
Model: Dart
Mileage: 4,451
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: SXT
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Gray
Cab Type: Other
Interior Color: Gray
Drivetrain: Front Wheel Drive
Dodge Dart for Sale
- 1971 dodge dart swinger hardtop 2-door 3.7l
- New 2013 dodge dart sxt remote start - free ship/airfare kchydodge(US $19,699.00)
- 1965 dodge dartcharger273 4bl 4 speed 1 0f 180 rare !
- New 2013 dodge dart sxt special edition - $285 p/mo, $200 down!(US $18,990.00)
- 67 dodge dart 2 dr ht
- 1969 dodge dart gt convertible v-8 4 speed
Auto Services in Idaho
Mechanics Pride Tire & Automotive Inc ★★★★★
Jacobs Auto Parts & Repair ★★★★★
In Depth Detailing ★★★★★
Idaho Auto Center ★★★★★
Dorsey Auto Sales ★★★★★
Deru`s Meridian Street Automtv ★★★★★
Auto blog
2013-14 Dodge Viper recalled over faulty door handles
Fri, Apr 10 2015The 2013-14 Dodge Viper is getting a voluntary recall affecting 1,762 cars worldwide to replace their door-handle assemblies. Of the affected vehicles, FCA US reports there are 1,451 in the US, 160 in Canada, 17 in Mexico and 59 of them outside of NAFTA. After receiving three reports of doors either not closing or opening while driving a low speeds, FCA US engineers found a new sealant from a supplier didn't provide sufficient moisture protection to the electronic switches for the door latches. If the parts get wet, this can potentially cause a short circuit. The automaker is quite clear that are no reports of accidents of injuries from this problem. As always, the recall repairs will be done at no cost to owners, and FCA US will be getting in touch with customers soon about the problem. Related Video: Statement: Door-handle Assemblies April 9, 2015 , Auburn Hills, Mich. - FCA US LLC is voluntarily recalling an estimated 1,762 cars globally to replace their door-handle assemblies. FCA US launched an investigation after the Company received three warranty claims linked to doors that failed to close or opened inadvertently while vehicles were moving at low speed. The Company is unaware of any related injuries or accidents. Engineers determined a sealant, newly adopted by a supplier, provided inconsistent moisture protection to the electronic switches that control the door latches. Switches exposed to moisture may short-circuit. Affected are approximately 1,451 model-year 2013-14 Dodge Viper SRT cars in the U.S.; 160 in Canada; 17 in Mexico and 59 outside the NAFTA region. Affected customers will be notified and advised when they may schedule service, which will be performed at no cost. Customers with questions may call the FCA US Customer Information Center at 1-800-853-1403.
2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat revealed [UPDATE]
Wed, 13 Aug 2014Almost immediately after we drove the 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat, we began wondering: what's next? Pumping 707 horsepower into the Challenger seemed so crazy - and so intoxicating - we just assumed that Dodge would try that trick again.
Rumors swirled about a Charger Hellcat. Frankly it makes even more sense than the Challenger version. The Charger is a bigger car, and Dodge has never been shy about dropping monster engines under its hood. Hell (cat), we've seen Charger mules running around town that appeared to be the super sedan.
And finally, it's here. The 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat was revealed today at a preview event near Detroit, and it will be a centerpiece of the Chrysler display this weekend at the Woodward Dream Cruise.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.