1970 Dodge Charger R/t Clone Hardtop 440 Plum Crazy Purple 1969 1968 70 69 68 on 2040-cars
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
For sale is a beautiful 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Clone. Beautiful Plum Crazy Purple paint with black vinyl top and leather interior. Very powerful 440 Big Block Engine. It has 18" Cragar wheels in the front and 20" in the back. It is a great combination and makes the car sit very well. This car turns heads everywhere it goes, and gets A LOT of attention!
The car runs and drives great and recently made a 45 minute trip with no issues. The car is located in Little Rock, Arkansas. You are more than welcome to come and inspect the car before the auction ends. The winning bidder must send a $500 non refundable deposit immediately after the auction ends. If you have any questions please send me your number and I will call you. I will be more than happy to answer any questions. This car is being sold AS IS, with no warranty implied. I welcome any inspectors to come look at the car. I am available anytime, please send a message and I will schedule an appointment. Thanks for looking and GOOD LUCK!
On Sep-12-14 at 08:03:42 PDT, seller added the following information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdPf_Kogn44&feature=youtu.be On Sep-12-14 at 19:54:58 PDT, seller added the following information: |
Dodge Charger for Sale
- 2007 dodge charger base sedan 4-door 2.7l
- 4dr sedan se rwd low miles automatic gasoline 3.6l v6 cyl tungsten metallic cle
- 2007 dodge charger srt8 sedan 4-door 6.1l
- 4dr sdn rt m 5.7l nav cd awd roof - power sunroof heated front seats seat-memory
- 2010 dodge charger sxt sedan 4-door 3.5l
- 1969 dodge charger general lee 440 big block mopar dukes of hazzard reacecar
Auto Services in Arkansas
Tint Pro & Accessories ★★★★★
Tim`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Swain`s Service Center ★★★★★
Seeburg Muffler & Brake ★★★★★
Seeburg Muffler & Brake ★★★★★
River City Motors II ★★★★★
Auto blog
Auto Mergers and Acquisitions: Suicide or salvation?
Tue, Sep 8 2015We love the Moses figure. A savior riding in from stage right with the ideas, the smarts, and the scrappiness to put things right. Alan Mullaly. Carroll Shelby. Lee Iacocca. Andrew Carnegie. Steve Jobs. Elon Musk. Bart Simpson. Sergio Marchionne does not likely view himself with Moses-like optics, but the CEO of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles recently gave a remarkable, perhaps prophetic interview with Automotive News about his interest and the inevitability of merging with a potential automotive partner like General Motors. Marchionne has been overtly public about his notion that GM must merge with FCA. For a bit of context, GM sold 9.9 million vehicles in 2014, posting $2.8 billion in net income, while FCA sold 4.75 million units and earned $2.4 billion in net income, painting a very rosy FCA earnings-to-sales picture. But that's not the entire picture. Most people in the auto industry still remember the trainwreck that was the DaimlerChrysler "merger" written in what turned out to be sand in 1998. It proved to be a master class in how not to fuse two companies, two cultures, two continents, and two management teams. Oh, it worked for the two individuals at both helms pre-merger. They got silly rich. And the industry itself was in a misty romance at the time with mergers and acquisitions. BMW bought Rolls-Royce. Volkswagen Group bought Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini, putting all three brands into their rightful place in both products and positioning. No marriages there, so no false pretense. Finally, Nissan and Renault got married in 1999. A successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust. But a successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust, the principle part being honesty. Daimler and Chrysler lied to each other. The heads of each unit, the product planners, and finance all presented their then-current and long-range forecasts to each other with less-than-forthright accuracy. Daimler was the far greater equal and no one from the Chrysler side enjoyed that. The cultures were entirely different, too, and little was done to bridge that gap. Which brings me back to the present overtures by Marchionne to GM. "There are varying degrees of hugs," Marchionne stated in the Automotive News piece. "I can hug you nicely, I can hug you tightly, I can hug you like a bear, I can really hug you." Seriously?
Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k
Tue, 07 Oct 2014Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.