Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1970 Dodge Charger Daytona on 2040-cars

US $14,235.00
Year:1970 Mileage:25615 Color: Orange /
 Black
Location:

Dexter, Minnesota, United States

Dexter, Minnesota, United States

1969 Dodge Charger Daytona clone. Every effort has been made to make this car a mirror image replica of the ultra
rare 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona. You would have to be a virtual Daytona expert to verify you are not looking at the
real deal. The restoration took years of research and collecting difficult to find parts as well as a huge time
commitment of labor to get the details just right. This Daytona was restored to appear very close to the way it
would have left the factory with the exception of a few subtle mechanical modifications to improve reliability,
drivability and performance over an original. This car has an all new front to back modern DOT 5 four wheel power
disc brake system including all the pads, rotors, calipers, brackets, shields, hoses, lines, master cylinder,
booster as well as the parking brake cables front and rear wheel bearings and seals. Rebuilt front suspension with
factory 1969 outboard sway bar and new shocks. The rear end is a bulletproof 8 3/4 sure-grip 3:23 posi track with
R/T leafs, new air adjustable shocks, new pinion seal as well as the correct green wheel bearings pressed on the
axels for the rear disc conversion. The car has a 26" radiator support, a new Direct fit three row Aluminum
radiator with stamped tanks and thermo switch controlled dual electric fans mounted in an an aluminum shroud. Mild
pro built 440 engine and 727 TorqueFlite Automatic transmission. Correct original 1969 440 Magnum Air cleaner,
exhaust manifolds, valve covers, water pump housing, accessory brackets and pulleys. All belts, hoses and clamps,
spark plugs, cap, rotor, wires, power steering hoses and lines, alternator, starter, water pump, complete engine
wire harness and transmission cooler lines are new as well. New fuel system front to back including the carburetor
with electronic choke, filter, pump, all lines, hoses, clamps, sending unit, fuel tank straps, tank mat, filler
tube seal and polished stainless steel fuel tank.

Auto Services in Minnesota

Woody`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 13327 Hwy 65 Service Road, Saint-Francis
Phone: (763) 757-2025

Tom Kadlec Honda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4444 Highway 52 N, Hammond
Phone: (507) 322-3069

The New 8th St Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 108 8th St NE, Byron
Phone: (507) 424-8258

Poquet Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Motor Homes, Recreational Vehicles & Campers
Address: 3106 State 371 NW, Hackensack
Phone: (218) 675-6665

New Hope Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 7140 42nd Ave N, Wayzata
Phone: (763) 535-5599

Muffler Clinic & Brakes ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 4301 Excelsior Blvd, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (952) 920-5242

Auto blog

Autoblog's guilty pleasure cars

Tue, Mar 10 2015

Guilty pleasures are part of life – don't even try to pretend like you don't have one (or two, or six). In the non-automotive space, this could come down to that secret playlist in your iPhone of songs you'll only listen to when you're alone; or think of that one TV show you really do love, but won't admit to your friends. I've got plenty, and so do you. Going back to cars, here's a particularly juicy one for me: several years ago, I had a mad crush on the very last iteration of the Cadillac DTS. Oh yes, the front-wheel-drive, Northstar V8-powered sofa-on-wheels that was the last remaining shred of the elderly-swooning days of Cadillac's past. Every time I had the chance to drive one, I was secretly giddy. Don't hate me, okay? These days, the DTS is gone, but I've still got a mess of other cars that hold a special place in my heart. And in the spirit of camaraderie, I've asked my other Autoblog editors to tell me some of their guilty pleasure cars, as well – Seyth Miersma, as you can see above, has a few choice emotions to share about the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Read on to find out what cars make us secretly happy. Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG This decadent convertible is the epitome of the guilty pleasure. It's big, powerful, fairly heavy and it's richly appointed inside and out. It's a chocolate eclair with the three-pointed star on the hood. Given my druthers, I'd take the SL65 AMG, which delivers 621 horsepower and 738 pound-feet of torque. That output is borderline absurd for this laid-back convertible. I don't care. You don't need dessert. Sometimes you just crave it. The SL line is about the feel you get on the road. The roof is open. The air, sun and engine sounds all embrace you. It's the same dynamic you could have experienced in a Mercedes a century ago, yet the SL gives you the most modern of luxuries. An Airscarf feature that warms my neck and shoulders through a vent embedded in the seat? Yes, please. Sure, it's an old-guy car. Mr. Burns and Lord Grantham are probably too young and hip for an SL65. I don't care. This is my guilty pleasure. Release the hounds. – Greg Migliore Senior Editor Ford Flex I drove my first Flex in 2009 when my mother let me borrow hers for the summer while I was away at college. The incredibly spacious interior made moving twice that summer a breeze, and the 200-mile trips up north were quite comfortable.

This or That: 2005 Dodge Ram SRT-10 vs. 2005 Subaru WRX STI [w/poll]

Thu, May 7 2015

Some cars, due to ultimate desirability, particular rareness, or spectacular performance/prestige eventually become collectible. It's darn near impossible to know which ones will make it into the rarefied stratosphere of collectibility – why is a late 1960s AMC AMX so affordable these days, whereas prices for late '70s Pontiac Trans Ams are soaring? – but there are some useful indicators to keep tabs on. We're not exactly experts on investing, but we do know cars. As such, we've decided to take our non-expertise on one hand, combine it in the other with our knowledge of all things automotive, wad it up, throw it out and ask for your forgiveness. Or something like that. I've challenged Senior Editor Seyth Miersma to choose a car he thinks will become a future collector's item that's not more than 10 years old, and for no more than $25,000. I've done the same, and we vigorously argued for and against each other's picks. I feel good about my choice, but I don't have the best track record in these contests (I've lost three times, won twice, but they've all been pretty close), so, while I'm not going to beg (please vote for me!), I do hope you find my argument convincing. But first, let's hear from Seyth: Miersma: Ten-years old or newer makes this challenging. At that age most vehicles feel like a plain old used car to me, few hit the "classic" button. But the Subaru WRX STI has always been a special car, and the 2005 cutoff year proves to be very attractive for the parameters of our contest. It's rare; with fewer than 5,000 STI models sold that model year. It's probably the best looking WRX STI ever sold in America; narrowly avoiding the dreadful "horse collar" front fascia. And it's got one of the more die-hard car-geek followings out there. For $25,000, you can also still find examples that have reasonable miles, are in good condition, and haven't all been molested by grown-up Initial D wannabes. With the street racers hacking up collectable examples every day, I like my odds for steep appreciation by way of conservation. I couldn't agree more. It really is difficult to predict what cars will catch the eye of collectors, and the WRX STI seems like a pretty good choice. But I think mine is even better, and I can't let him know that I'd love to park just such an STI in my very own garage. And so goes my argument: Korzeniewski: I like your choice as a driver, Seyth. I'm less convinced of its status as a sure-fire collectible.

Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time

Mon, Jul 20 2015

The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.