2003 Dodge Caravan Se 48k Low Miles Solid Frame Runs Like New No Reserve on 2040-cars
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:3.3L V6
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Vehicle Title:Clean
Year: 2003
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1D4GP253X3B128461
Mileage: 48739
Interior Color: Tan
Previously Registered Overseas: No
Number of Seats: 7
Number of Previous Owners: 1
Fuel Consumption Rate: 18 City / 23 Hwy
Drive Side: Left-Hand Drive
Horse Power: 111 - 185 kW (148.74 - 247.9 hp)
Independent Vehicle Inspection: Yes
Engine Size: 3.3 L
Exterior Color: White
Car Type: Passenger Vehicles
Number of Doors: 4
Features: AM/FM Stereo, Air Conditioning, Alarm, CD Player, Catalyst, Cloth seats, DVD/CD Player, Electric Mirrors, Electronic Stability Control, Folding Mirrors, Metallic Paint, Power Locks, Power Steering, Power Windows, Tilt Steering Wheel, Tinted Rear Windows
Trim: SE 48K LOW MILES SOLID FRAME RUNS LIKE NEW NO RESERVE
Number of Cylinders: 6
Drive Type: FWD
Service History Available: Partial
Make: Dodge
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Back Seat Safety Belts, Driver Airbag, Electronic Stability Program (ESP), Fog Lights, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags, Traction Control
Model: Caravan
Country/Region of Manufacture: United States
Dodge Caravan for Sale
- 2010 dodge caravan(US $5,200.00)
- 2010 dodge caravan sxt(US $19,500.00)
- 2004 dodge caravan se(US $250.00)
- 2014 dodge grand caravan sxt handicap wheelchair rear entry(US $21,900.00)
- 2013 dodge caravan(US $8,900.00)
- 2006 dodge caravan(US $4,000.00)
Auto blog
Man hits 153 mph on I-75 in Dodge Magnum
Tue, May 19 2015A man driving in Michigan took his 2005 Dodge Magnum practically to the limit in the wee hours of the morning on May 19 when the Michigan State Police caught him on radar going 153 miles per hour on Interstate 75 near Detroit. The 21-year-old driver was spotted around 3:00 AM, according to The Detroit News. Michigan State Police First Lieutenant Michael Shaw told Autoblog that officers initially saw the man on radar doing 79 mph in a 70-mph-zone, and they started following him. He eventually clocked 153 mph. However, First Lt. Shaw was clear that there was never a pursuit. "Speeding isn't necessarily a reason to put the public at risk," he said. The situation ended rather abruptly, though. The driver pulled off the interstate and behind a building. He remained in the vehicle, and police arrived and arrested him. According to First Lt. Shaw, the man was driving home from work and alcohol wasn't a factor. The Magnum has been impounded, and the driver was charged with reckless driving. Unfortunately, First Lt. Shaw said that he didn't know what engine was in the wagon, but as enthusiasts, we're curious. After all, the 2005 Magnum RT was governed to 130 mph and the SRT8 wasn't unleashed until 2006, which means either the wagon must've been derestricted to hit such high speeds or that police have the year wrong. We'll let you know if we figure that one out...
Weekly Recap: FCA hit with record fine as NHTSA crackdown continues
Sat, Aug 1 2015The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration slapped Fiat Chrysler Automobiles with a record fine this week that could reach $105 million. The punishment comes after NHTSA found problems with the automaker's execution of 23 recalls that affect more than 11 million vehicles. The consent agreement, announced Sunday, calls for FCA to pay a $70-million cash fine and requires the company to spend at least $20 million over a three-year period on industry outreach programs and to beef up old recall campaigns. Failure to comply will result in another $15-million fine. FCA also agreed to federal oversight, which includes an independent monitor to oversee the company's recalls. The $70-million cash fine equals a penalty NHTSA levied on Honda in January. "Fiat Chrysler's pattern of poor performance put millions of its customers and the driving public at risk," NHTSA administrator Mark Rosekind said in a statement. "This action will provide relief to owners of defective vehicles, will help improve recall performance throughout the auto industry, and gives Fiat Chrysler the opportunity to embrace a proactive safety culture." FCA called the deal a "consensual resolution," but admitted that it "failed to timely provide an effective remedy" during certain recalls. "We are intent on rebuilding our relationship with NHTSA and we embrace the role of public safety advocate," the company said in a statement. The announcement kicked off a busy week for the automaker. NHTSA agreed FCA did not need to recall 4.7 million vehicles after an investigation failed to find defects with a power module used in some Jeep, Dodge, and Ram vehicles. A Georgia judge also reduced a civil verdict involving a death in a Jeep Grand Cherokee crash. Amid all of that, the company reported net profit of about 333 million euros, or $364 million in the second quarter on Thursday. OTHER NEWS & NOTES FCA ramps up Hellcat production Despite a decidedly legal and financial week for FCA, there was still time for the performance side of the business to briefly grab the spotlight. The automaker is more than doubling its production of the Dodge Challenger and Charger SRT Hellcats in response to strong demand. The order bank opens the second week of August and production begins in September. FCA will finish up its scheduled 2015 model-year Hellcat builds, and cancel any "unscheduled" versions, though customers will get discounted pricing for 2016.
25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel
Mon, 10 Mar 2014Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.