Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 Dodge Challenger on 2040-cars

US $21,995.00
Year:1974 Mileage:159742
Location:

Castroville, Texas, United States

Castroville, Texas, United States

Offered  is a restored 74 Challenger. Original color was a burnished red poly, repainted to manufacturer color code B1 - Powder Blue.  Interior completely replaced with an upgrade package from Legendary Interior.  Includes everything: headliner, carpets, door panels, trim completely reconditioned and painted factory black, new sun visors, reconditioned dash face and instrument panel. New dash pad (not just a cover!), kick panels, door sills, new window seal strips, quarter windows inserts.  New bumpers with rechromed bumper extensions and rubber in excellent condition (a rare find all by themselves).   New white vinyl top - Mopar replacement - NO rust underneath old top!.  Brakes have all been rebuilt with new components, front end bushings replaced and new pitman arm and ball joints.  Engine is rebuilt: 30 over with new bearings, seals, etc. Has a factory original 4bbl manifold running a Edelbrock 1406, 600cfm 4bbl carb. also has new voltage regulator, new mini starter, new aluminum radiator.  Installed is a Vintage Air a/c system, fully integrated nicely into the interior - looks factory, works better than factory.  Tires are new, wheels are 5 months old - American racing Torq D, all chrome, 14X6 standard size wheels.  Factory original am/fm radio installed - works most of the time. New trunk lid and floor pans.   Rear window has a reproduction louver  installed, and truck lid has a factory style rear wing - just like one saw on many Challenger, Cuda, and Mustangs of the time - they all used the same one.  Buyer pays, plans any shipping arrangements. Car will not be released until full payment is received and processed.  One can see car by appointment.  Contact Bob at 210-861-4393 any day between 8 am and 8 pm central time.  Car is located in Castroville, Texas 78009. 

Auto Services in Texas

Wynn`s Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 10649 Sentinel St, Converse
Phone: (210) 650-0353

Westside Trim & Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 2117 White Settlement Rd, Lake-Worth
Phone: (817) 659-9305

Wash Me Car Salon ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Automobile Detailing
Address: 7225 Culebra Rd, Leon-Valley
Phone: (210) 681-9274

Vernon & Fletcher Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: Rockwood
Phone: (325) 261-4916

Vehicle Inspections By Mogo ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 10525 Cypress Creek Pkwy, Cypress
Phone: (281) 807-6673

Two Brothers Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 2502 Central Ave Suite B, Desoto
Phone: (972) 266-5455

Auto blog

MotorWeek relives '80s coupes with Dodge Daytona, Ford Escort EXP

Thu, Aug 6 2015

Get ready for a wave of nostalgia and the rapid realization of the huge progress in performance cars over the last 30 years. For its latest Retro Review, MotorWeek takes a look back at two, front-wheel drive coupes from the '80s that seem to have entirely vanished from the roads today. Both the 1986 Dodge Daytona CS and the 1986.5 Ford Escort EXP were considered affordable, sporty options in their day, but the passage of time hasn't been kind to either of their specs. The Daytona certainly looks the part of a performance machine with a body that's reminiscent of other '80s coupes, like the third-gen Chevrolet Camaro. However with 146 horsepower and 170 pound-feet of torque from a 2.2-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, acceleration wasn't exactly a strong suit. MotorWeek complained about copious torque steer, as well. The optional CS suspension upgrade package on this Daytona was apparently a nod to Carroll Shelby who was working with Dodge at the time. If anything, the Escort EXP withstands the test of time even worse. As a two-seat coupe, you might have expected Ford's engineers to really turn up the performance to fit the sporty image that the exterior conveyed. That didn't really happen, and depending on which model buyers ordered, they got either 86 horsepower with a 1.9-liter engine or the "high-output" version of that mill with 108 hp.

Say goodbye to the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200

Wed, Jan 27 2016

Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne outlined an update to the company's five-year business plan Wednesday, and among the changes, the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200 sedans will soon be phased out. The company's presentation to investors states that the "market shift from cars to trucks and UVs [utility vehicles is] now seen as permanent shift in demand," and FCA wants to respond as quickly as possible. Killing the 200 and Dart will allow FCA to build more Jeep and Ram models at the Sterling Heights, MI, and Belvidere, IL, plants where the sedans were produced. We already knew FCA was planning to shift 200 and Dart production to Mexico, to free up the Sterling Heights facility for Ram 1500 production, and the Belivdere site for Jeep Cherokee output. The Cherokee will move from its current home in Toledo, OH, to allow for increased Wrangler production. It's no shock that FCA wants to shift its focus to crossovers and trucks. In December 2015, for example, combined sales of the Dodge Dart and Chrysler 200 were 15,310. The Jeep Cherokee, which uses the same platform as the Dart and 200, outsold both models combined, with 24,049 sales. Both the Dart and 200 had troubles from the beginning. Marchionne recently blamed designers for the 200 not receiving a Consumer Reports 'recommended' rating, and the Dart was one of the lowest-scoring cars in a CR reliability study. Featured Gallery 2013 Dodge Dart: Review View 27 Photos Related Gallery 2015 Chrysler 200 View 43 Photos Image Credit: Copyright 2016 Drew Phillips / AOL Chrysler Dodge Jeep RAM FCA confirmed

Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time

Mon, Jul 20 2015

The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.