Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1982 Chrysler Imperial Frank Sinatra Edition, Calif Desert Car, Low Miles on 2040-cars

Year:1982 Mileage:68369 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Victorville, California, United States

Victorville, California, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:318 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 2A3BY62J7CR111907 Year: 1982
Exterior Color: Blue
Make: Chrysler
Interior Color: Blue
Model: Imperial
Trim: Frank Sinatra Edition
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: Rear Wheel
Mileage: 68,369
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

I am selling this car for my elderly father-in-law, who is the second owner.  The car is in the desert community of Victorville, CA about half way between Los Angeles and Las Vegas.  He last drove it six or seven years ago - it has been sitting in his garage ever since.  


The Frank Sinatra edition Imperial is actually quite rare as very few were made.  The following is from Allpar.com:  
“To try to stimulate sales we even did a ‘Blue Eyes’ special model that was the color of Frank Sinatra's eyes [Glaciar Blue paint]. The buyer also got a console full of Frank Sinatra cassettes with the car. (Frank and Lee were buddies then and called each other ‘Chairman.’)” The Frank Sinatra edition was made in 1981 and 1982, costing a stunning $2,000 more.  The “FS” Imperials also included platinum-color carpet, sky-blue leather or velour, emblems, a console that held 10 cassettes, and a leather cassette carrying case. 278 of the special-order cars were made, a decent number considering the added cost of the car and the ready availability of Frank Sinatra cassettes.  

To those who recognize this listing from around Thanksgiving time, the auction was sniped at the last second by some guy in Brazil who wrote me that he couldn't think about getting it shipped for at least six months - even though the ad said "Sell to USA only" and implied it needed to go ASAP.  So, on principle I had the transaction cancelled.  In that listing I described it as a non-running car because it had been sitting for so long and I didn't want to deal with it since I live 120 miles away.  I learned from bidders in that last listing that a non-running car presents some transport issues (costs more or some transporters won't do it).  Over the holidays and in February we got out to Victorville and I spent a couple of days getting the car going.  I'm a car guy (well, muscle cars) and know what I am doing so I didn't screw anything up getting it started.  With new oil, gas, coolant, various lines, and a battery it started right up and ran fine.  I just took it around the block to make sure no strange suspension or engine noises.  It's not registered so I didn't want to risk getting caught because here in CA every ticket costs a fortune. 

Exterior condition is great as far as rust because there is none.  The paint is faded, especially on the hood and roof as can be seen in the pictures.  The passenger mirror needs replacement. I remember noticing a crack in the windshield somewhere but it's not real obvious in the pictures.  The interior is missing a door handle, but aside from needing a good cleaning, looks in great shape.  I checked the radio, air, heat, headlights, dash lights, etc and everything worked fine.   

So to sum it up, this was and is a running car but it has been sitting for a long time.  The tires were basically new when it was parked in the garage but not sure how time affects that. Without a thorough checkup of fuel rubber, coolant rubber, tires, I personally would not drive this car home since leaving Victorville means you have an hour or so of desert in every direction. 

The cassettes, case, umbrella that came with the FS edition are no longer with the car.  They weren't there when my father-in-law got it.


Sell to USA only.

Auto Services in California

Young`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3509 Grand Ave, Diablo
Phone: (510) 444-4185

Yas` Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 1610 Allston Way, Albany
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Wise Tire & Brake Co. Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 949 S La Brea Ave, Torrance
Phone: (310) 904-6163

Wilson Motorsports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2138 Otoole ave, San-Jose
Phone: (408) 267-7937

White Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 250 E Whittier Blvd, Los-Nietos
Phone: (562) 697-2612

Wheeler`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 327 W 17th St, Santa-Ana
Phone: (714) 543-4689

Auto blog

Chrysler recalling nearly half a million vehicles with active head restraints

Thu, 04 Jul 2013

Chrysler has announced that it will recall roughly 490,000 vehicles around the globe due to a potential active head-restraint problem. The problem is being blamed on "potentially faulty microcontrollers" that may keep the vehicles' anti-whiplash active safety feature from working properly. Chrysler says it has no knowledge of any accidents or injuries related to the issue. Models covered under the recall include the 2011-2013 Chrysler Sebring, 200 (shown) and Dodge Avenger models, along with 2011-2013 Jeep Liberty and 2011-2012 Dodge Nitro SUVs.
Interestingly, the Pentastar notes that the faulty part came from an (unnamed) supplier who furnished the parts in the wake of Japan's 2011 earthquake and tsunami, natural disasters which decimated the world's supply of microcontrollers.
Chrysler says of those nearly half a million vehicles affected, around 442,000 of them reside in the US, with an additional 25,000 in Canada and 10,000 units in Mexico. A further 12,000 models were shipped beyond the NAFTA region. The Auburn Hills automaker will begin sending out recall notices shortly, and technicians will upgrade the system software or replace the microcontroller as necessary at no cost to owners.

Dodge Challenger spied exercising supercharged Hellcat Hemi V8

Wed, 23 Oct 2013

One of the prime complaints against the Dodge Challenger is that, even in SRT8 guise, its 470 horsepower is responsible for hauling over 4,200 pounds of vehicle. For comparison, the 420 hp in the Ford Mustang GT only has to deal with 3,618 lbs. Things only get worse from there, as the higher-performance variants of both the Mustang and the Chevrolet Camaro are far more powerful than an SRT8 without adding on much heft.
So what is Chrysler to do? The correct answer is add a whole lot more grunt to its hefty two-door and even the odds. That's where the all-new Hellcat engine comes into play. We reported on this engine in May, and suggested that the Hellcat, a supercharged powerplant based on a 6.4-liter V8, would easily generate 500 to 570 hp and could likely arrive boasting more than 600 ponies.
Chrysler's ace in its sleeve has now been spied testing, with a number of Hellcat-equipped Challengers running the potent new engine both in more urbanized areas and under the sun of Death Valley. The hoods on these testers have been raised to accommodate the engine, and that camouflage over the fascias of these prototypes is there to hide a larger air intake. We also note what appears to be a new split grille under wraps. As for power output, our spies are now suggesting a Viper-equalling 640 hp from the Hellcat-equipped cars.

Chrysler defies NHTSA, says it won't recall 2.7M Jeep Grand Cherokee, Liberty models

Wed, 05 Jun 2013

Facing a possible recall totaling around 2.7 million of its most popular SUVs, Chrysler remains insistent that the 1993-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002-2007 Jeep Liberty are safe vehicles. This comes on the heels of a recall request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for these two models due to fuel tanks mounted behind the rear axle, which could possibly be ruptured during severe rear-end collisions, leading to an increased risk of fire. In response to the allegations, Chrysler says that it does not agree with NHTSA nor does it plan on recalling either vehicle.
Chrysler said both SUVs "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity, and cooperated fully with NHTSA since the investigation was opened in 2010. While 15 deaths and 46 injuries have been reported from fires caused by rear-end collisions on these models, Chrysler is claiming that the vast majority of incidents cited by NHTSA were "high-energy crashes," including one where a stopped Grand Cherokee was rear-ended by a tractor trailer going 65 miles per hour.
The automaker wraps up by saying "NHTSA seems to be holding Chrysler Group to a new standard for fuel tank integrity that does not exist now and did not exist when the Jeep vehicles were manufactured." Scroll down for Chrysler's official response to NHTSA, but we're pretty sure this isn't the last we've heard on this issue.