2005 Chrysler Crossfire Base Coupe 2-door 3.2l on 2040-cars
Stuart, Florida, United States
You are bidding on a super clean 2005 Chrysler Crossfire with very low mileage of 21,013. This one owner vehicle has been garage kept and immaculately maintained by local Chrysler dealership. All scheduled maintenance and oil changes with Mobile 1 synthetic. This vehicle has been slightly modified by de-badging, lowered by Eibach Sport Springs and gloss powder-coated OEM wheels. The stereo has been professionally upgraded with JL Audio high end sound system including (2) W6 10 woofers and JL Audio 1000/1 Watt amplifier and 300/2 amplifier. All OEM speakers have been replaced with JL Audio mids/highs. Total system cost over $5,000.00. Battery was just replaced 5/7/2104 and brand new Continental Sport Contact 2 tires all around (2) 235x40x18 fronts and (2) 255x35x19 rears. This vehicle is pampered by an auto enthusiast. All original paint, never wrecked or painted. Bid with confidence. No disappointments here. Serious buyers only. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (772) 708-6317 or email vince@waterpointe.com with any questions. |
Chrysler Crossfire for Sale
- 2005y chrysler crossfire srt-6 coupe 2-door supercharged amg 3.2l(US $11,950.00)
- Limited crossfire.. clean carfax.. low mileage.
- 2005 chrysler crossfire base convertible 2-door 3.2l(US $8,200.00)
- 2004 chrysler crossfire base coupe 2-door 3.2l
- Srt 6 crossfire
- His and hers 2004 chrysler crossfires,1 black and 1 white,coupes,low reserve
Auto Services in Florida
Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★
World Of Auto Tinting Inc ★★★★★
Wilson Bimmer Repair ★★★★★
Willy`s Paint And Body Shop Of Miami Inc ★★★★★
William Wade Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wheel Innovations & Wheel Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford tumbles to second worst in Consumer Reports reliability survey, list dominated by Japanese [w/video]
Mon, 29 Oct 2012It's no secret that MyFord Touch has had its share of problems since being introduced, but the most recent reliability survey from Consumer Reports shows just how much this infotainment system has affected Ford. Just two years ago, the automaker was in the top 10 for the institute's reliability rankings, but since then, it has tumbled to the second-lowest rung just above dead-last Jaguar. In addition to MyFord Touch, CR also attributes a handful of new products that have had issues right out of the gate.
Compiled from 1.2 million subscriber surveys, this year's auto reliability survey heavily favors Japanese automakers, with eight of the 10 spots hailing from Japan. Toyota brands grabbed the top three spots (Scion, Toyota and Lexus - in that order) with Mazda, Subaru, Honda and Acura filling the next four spots. The only non-Asian automaker cracking the top 10 was Audi at number eight.
Audi climbed a total of 18 spots from last year, and Cadillac and GMC round out this year's top gainers breaking into the top 15. Helping Cadillac's upward movement, the CTS Coupe was named the most reliable domestic car. Lincoln, Volvo and Chrysler join Ford on this year's biggest loser list.
Jeep Renegade's development a template for new Fiat Chrysler Auto
Wed, 24 Sep 2014
"We figured we'd take the best of both worlds." - Ralph Gilles.
The international makeup of the 2015 Jeep Renegade will serve as a template for cooperation within the newly formed Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Senior Vice President of Product Design Ralph Gilles said.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.