Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1962 Chrysler Newport 4 Dr on 2040-cars

US $1,600.00
Year:1962 Mileage:74448 Color: bronz
Location:

Vincennes, Indiana, United States

Vincennes, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:361 bb
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 812315574b Year: 1962
Mileage: 74,448
Make: Chrysler
Exterior Color: bronz
Model: Newport
Trim: basic
Power Options: NO AIR NO POWER WINDOW'S NO POWER SEATS
Drive Type: push button automatic
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

I am selling a 1962 Chrysler Newport that I have recently purchased on e-bay,The car has a 361 Big block , With a push button automatic, THE BLOCK IS CRACKED,But does run but will not hold antifreeze,The transmission does pull the car around all i can tell you..I  drove the car down the drive to be picked up by wrecker to go to shop to be checked out, Because of the the antifreeze leak.. Since i have found another project and have no room to keep the car, so it must go..The car is complete, has rust to be fixed as far as I can tell all is there and original, one hubcap is missing,and one strip of chrome is off , is inside of car,..Front and rear  floorboard's are in need of repair, car has rust in the normal places for it's age.Easy fix..Selling as is where is,  car is to be picked up buy buyer....NO POWER SEATS       NO  A/C      NO POWER WINDOWS ......As you can see the picture of the chrome rim I have all four with good tires mounted and balanced I WILL ONLY INCLUDE THE  M. K. W. TIRE'S AND RIM'S IF THE CAR SELL'S FOR  $1,600.00

Auto Services in Indiana

Westside Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 639 S Harding St, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 638-7000

Voelkel`s Collision Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6201 Oaklandon Rd, Indianapolis
Phone: (317) 823-6200

Tammy`s Towing And Auto Recycling ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Scrap Metals
Address: 225 Dalman Ave, Fort-Wayne
Phone: (260) 246-2468

Superior Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 329 Highway 44 E, Elizabeth
Phone: (502) 921-2968

Sid`s Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: 628 E Fairchild St, Marshfield
Phone: (217) 446-7827

Safeway Auto Repair-Used Tires ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 521 N Ohio St, Miami
Phone: (765) 450-4206

Auto blog

Suppliers love Toyota and Honda: Why that matters to you

Mon, May 15 2017

You might think that a survey of automotive suppliers and their relationship with OEMs is the automotive equivalent of nerd prom. In some ways that's what the North American Automotive OEM-Supplier Working Relations Index (WRI) is. The study, the 17th annual conducted by Planning Perspectives Inc., is based on input from 652 salespeople from 108 Tier One suppliers, or, PPI points out, 40 of the top 50 automotive suppliers in North America. Suppliers to General Motors, Ford, FCA, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. But the results have consequences in terms of tens of millions of dollars for OEMs - and in the quality, technology, and cost of the next vehicle you buy. There are a couple of ways to look at the results of the WRI. One is, "So what else is new?" And the other is, "Damn! How did that happen?" The study looks at five relationship areas — OEM Supplier Relationship; OEM Communication; OEM Help; OEM Hindrance; Supplier Profit Opportunity — within six purchasing areas — Body-in-White; Chassis; Electrical/Electronics; Exterior; Interior; Powertrain. In the overall rankings, Toyota is on top for the 15 th time in 17 years, with a score of 328. Honda, the only company to best Toyota (in 2009 and 2010), comes in second, at 319. Those two companies, explains John Henke, president of PPI, have collaborative working arrangements with colleagues and suppliers alike built into the very fabric of their cultures. This, however, is not a situation where one can readily conclude it is about "Japanese companies," because the third company with headquarters on the island of Honshu, Nissan, came in dead last. This is the "How did that happen?" portion. The Nissan score of 203 puts it 125 points behind Toyota. There hasn't been a number that low since the then-Chrysler Corp. scored 187 in 2010, when the company was clawing its way out of the recession. Clearly, the suppliers don't feel particularly engaged by the buyers at Nissan. Henke explains that whether a company does well or not on the WRI is rather simple. All people do things based on what they're measured on. "If you're measured on taking 10% out of your annual buy, you immediately know how to do it. But if you're also measured on improving relations, suddenly there is a new dynamic as to what you can do to achieve both.

Detroit 3 small cars lay an egg in latest Consumer Reports reliability study

Tue, 28 Oct 2014

Consumer Reports has released its Annual Auto Reliability Survey and the results are, in a word, interesting. While we already covered the score-damaging effects of infotainment systems, there's another big angle to the data that's getting some attention - the utterly dismal scores of the Detroit Three's small car offerings.
The turbocharged Dodge Dart and Chevrolet Cruze, as well as the Ford Fiesta were their respective brands' lowest-scoring models, a stat that's made worse by the fact that the American automakers finished 25th, 21st and 23rd, respectively.
That's not acceptable for The Detroit Free Press' auto critic, Mark Phelan, who has penned a scathing critique of the D3's small car reliability scores, arguing that GM, Ford and Chrysler are "out of excuses."

This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero

Tue, Feb 10 2015

Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...