Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 Chrysler New Yorker Base Hardtop 4-door 7.2l - Very Clean on 2040-cars

Year:1974 Mileage:73985
Location:

Madison, Connecticut, United States

Madison, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:

 

1974 Chrysler New Yorker.  One family (three generations) owned since new.  Car has been always very well taken care of and garaged.  The car has also been regularly serviced over the years as scheduled and needed.  This is a somewhat unique car in that it was one of the last remaining large bodied Chryslers made, as the oil embargo of the late 1970s really was a game changer for automobile design at the time.. Chrysler in particular.  As such, few 1974 large Chryslers were sold that year.  Also somewhat interesting to note, is the fact that 1974 was the last year that cars were not required to be manufactured with catalytic converters as mandated by the Federal Government for 1975 and newer cars.  As such, the 1974 models could still run on “high-test” leaded fuel.  Being a “hardtop” also makes it a touch more special.

I would describe the overall condition of the car to be very good, not perfect, but very good.  If you are looking for a Pebble Beach or Greenwich concours winner, this would not be your car.  If you are looking for a good solid car that presents well and you can have fun driving a somewhat unique car to your favorite local car shows or date nights, then I think you’ll be pleased for years to come. 

Mechanically, the engine starts well and revs well until it is warmed up and then you can easily knock it down to a lower rpm by punching the gas pedal quickly – exactly as it was designed.  The car shifts through it’s three speed Torqueflite gears with ease and without issue.  The engine does not smoke or burn any noticeable oil to speak of.  The original am/fm stereo works well (don’t expect today’s sound quality or reception).  The heater/vent/ac systems all seem to work, but I would argue that the AC is a bit anemic and could benefit from a charge.  All power windows function as they should.  The car tracks down the road nicely and offers a comfortable ride without any odd noises or noticeable issues.  The odometer works and reads 73,985 miles and I believe this to be accurate, but I cannot confirm this officially – it may have been around once.

Cosmetically, I would describe the car as a 6-footer.  From 6 feet away, the car presents very nicely with decent shine on paintwork and chrome.  Closer inspection would reveal imperfections that 40 years of even light service would reflect.  The same could be said of the parchment color interior.  There are a couple small holes in the headliner, but the vinyl seats are all in good shape.  Several years ago, Brougham seats (front & back), that were a perfect color and size match for the more generic standard New Yorker seats, were installed to not only give a better look to the car, but to provide greater comfort.  The car has never been in any significant accident and posses all original sheet metal. 

I have many OEM trim parts available for the car that I have collected over the years and I will make them available to the winning bidder.  Also included is a mint rear bumper (there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the one on the car, but the chrome is less than perfect). 

In describing the condition of the car in any way, it should be noted that I am not an automotive professional, dealer or mechanic.  I have attempted to describe the car as accurately as possible as an automotive lay person.  All bidders and prospective buyers of this automobile MUST make their own assessments as to the condition of the car to satisfy their desires and needs – my description should be used as a general guide only.  The car will be available for viewing, driving and inspection at mutually convenient times and all must be performed prior to auction close.  The car is 40 years old – please consider this accordingly before you bid!  There is absolutely no warranty, guarantee or set aside for the sale of this car.  In other words, the car is being sold As-Is/Where-is.  Again, it is the bidder’s responsibility to thoroughly satisfy themselves with the overall condition of the car prior to bidding, and then bid accordingly.  The car does not come with a title, only because the State of Connecticut does not title cars manufactured prior to 1981. 

The winning bidder is responsible for pick-up and delivery costs and arrangements.

Thank you for considering this car – I am sure it will make the right person happy!

Auto Services in Connecticut

Xtreme Auto Center Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 266 Davis Dr, East-Killingly
Phone: (401) 568-0823

Wrench Rite Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 40 NE Industrial Rd Ste C, Guilford
Phone: (203) 483-5400

Waterbury Auto Salvage Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 55 Eagle St, Morris
Phone: (203) 754-2189

TLC Town Cars ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 721 Scarsdale Rd, Greenwich
Phone: (888) 852-8696

Tire Warehouse ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 572 Holyoke St, West-Suffield
Phone: (413) 583-6872

Tint Works/Sound Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 923 Dixwell Ave, Hamden
Phone: (203) 785-8692

Auto blog

Trump is pleased with FCA's investment in Michigan and Ohio, but it wasn't done for him

Mon, Jan 9 2017

Fiat Chrysler announced yesterday that it would be spending $1 billion on vehicle production in both Michigan and Ohio. The company estimates that its investment will yield about 2,000 jobs between both states. In addition to attracting our attention, it caught the gaze of President-elect Donald Trump, who tweeted praise to both FCA and the Ford Motor Company. He praised the latter for the company's move to cancel a new factory in Mexico. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Trump's writing also seems to imply he deserves a certain amount of credit for these shifts to American production. However, as Sergio Marchionne, CEO of FCA, explained to the press in a conference today, Trump and his impending administration had nothing to do with the decision. He said the decision to invest in the plants in Michigan and Ohio were in place well before Trump was going to be the President of the United States. In addition, he said that FCA has not been in contact with Trump or any of his colleagues regarding the decision. Marchionne also stated that neither he nor the company was making any preemptive plans for manufacturing locations the light of the upcoming Trump presidency. Rather, he said that the company will change to address regulations that are actually passed, and the only way the company could change plans ahead of new laws or taxes would be with more information and clarity. We assume that a "big border tax" isn't specific enough. Still, the fact that automakers are going out of their way to make and clarify announcements about manufacturing illustrates the massive attention Trump brings with every Tweet. Related Video: Government/Legal Plants/Manufacturing Detroit Auto Show Chrysler Fiat Sergio Marchionne FCA 2017 Detroit Auto Show

The USPS needs 180,000 new delivery vehicles, automakers gearing up to bid

Wed, Feb 18 2015

Winning the New York City Taxi of Tomorrow tender was a huge prize for Nissan, even though the company is still working through the process of claiming its prize. The United States Postal Service has begun the process to take bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace the all-too-familiar Grumman Long Life Vehicle, and that will be a much larger plum for the automaker who wins it, perhaps worth more than six billion dollars. The Grumman LLV is an aluminum body covering a Chevrolet S-10 pickup chassis and General Motors' Iron Duke four-cylinder engine. The USPS bought them from 1987 to 1994, and the 163,000 of them still in service are a monumental drain on postal resources: they get roughly ten miles to the gallon instead of the quoted 16 mpg, drink up more than $530 million in fuel each year, and their constant repair needs like the balky sliding door and leaky windshields have led the service to increase the annual maintenance budget from $100 million to $500 million. A seat belt is about as modern as it gets for safety technology, and the USPS says that assuming things stay the same, it can't afford to run them beyond 2017. Last year it put out two triage requests for proposals seeking 10,000 new chassis and drivetrains for the Grumman and 10,000 new vehicles. The LLV is also too small for the modern mail system in which package delivery is growing and letter delivery is declining. The service says it doesn't have a fixed idea of the ideal "next-generation delivery vehicles," but it listed a number of requirements in its initial request and is open to any proposal. Carriers have some suggestions, though, saying they want better cupholders, sun visors that they can stuff letters behind, a driver's compartment free of slits that can swallow mail, and a backup camera. The request for information sent to automakers pegs the tender at 180,000 vehicles that would cost between $25,000 and $35,000 apiece, and it will hold a conference on February 18 to answer questions about the contract. GM is the only domestic maker to avow an interest, while Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have remained cagey. Yet with a possible $6.3 billion up for grabs and some new vans for sale that would be advertised on every block in the country, we have a feeling everyone will be listening closely come February 18. We also have a feeling the LeMons series is going to be flooded with Grummans come 2017. News Source: Wall Street Journal, Automotive News - sub.

Auto Mergers and Acquisitions: Suicide or salvation?

Tue, Sep 8 2015

We love the Moses figure. A savior riding in from stage right with the ideas, the smarts, and the scrappiness to put things right. Alan Mullaly. Carroll Shelby. Lee Iacocca. Andrew Carnegie. Steve Jobs. Elon Musk. Bart Simpson. Sergio Marchionne does not likely view himself with Moses-like optics, but the CEO of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles recently gave a remarkable, perhaps prophetic interview with Automotive News about his interest and the inevitability of merging with a potential automotive partner like General Motors. Marchionne has been overtly public about his notion that GM must merge with FCA. For a bit of context, GM sold 9.9 million vehicles in 2014, posting $2.8 billion in net income, while FCA sold 4.75 million units and earned $2.4 billion in net income, painting a very rosy FCA earnings-to-sales picture. But that's not the entire picture. Most people in the auto industry still remember the trainwreck that was the DaimlerChrysler "merger" written in what turned out to be sand in 1998. It proved to be a master class in how not to fuse two companies, two cultures, two continents, and two management teams. Oh, it worked for the two individuals at both helms pre-merger. They got silly rich. And the industry itself was in a misty romance at the time with mergers and acquisitions. BMW bought Rolls-Royce. Volkswagen Group bought Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini, putting all three brands into their rightful place in both products and positioning. No marriages there, so no false pretense. Finally, Nissan and Renault got married in 1999. A successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust. But a successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust, the principle part being honesty. Daimler and Chrysler lied to each other. The heads of each unit, the product planners, and finance all presented their then-current and long-range forecasts to each other with less-than-forthright accuracy. Daimler was the far greater equal and no one from the Chrysler side enjoyed that. The cultures were entirely different, too, and little was done to bridge that gap. Which brings me back to the present overtures by Marchionne to GM. "There are varying degrees of hugs," Marchionne stated in the Automotive News piece. "I can hug you nicely, I can hug you tightly, I can hug you like a bear, I can really hug you." Seriously?