2004 Chrysler- Pt Cruiser Limited Turbo Platinum Series 4-door Wagon on 2040-cars
Montour Falls, New York, United States
|
Good daily driver. Would make a good first car or reliable transportation for a young family. Reliable zippy, fast and fun. Has a little rust bubbles forming over the rear of the wheels on the fenders and bottom lower rocker panels, (hardly noticeable). Could be addressed before any serious damage accrues. Rust is typical for New York car of this age. There is also a small crack on the driver's side of the windshield along the edge not in line of sight (passed inspection). I am hoping to get my insurance to take care of this when I get a moment.
The car had a tree branch fall on it few years back and so the roof and driver's side door has been replaced.and repainted professionally. The garage did a great job repainted it. Sub-woofers on the stereo are blown, and one of the motor mounts is shot as is typical of a PT Cruiser of this age and millage, but does not effect the driving. A bit of cutting and welding had to be done when replace some of the front bushings due to a stuck bolt. This may make it a bit more difficult If you decided to replace the rest of the front bushings. I believe that about covers it other than a few chips in the clear coat on the front. Car is sold as is with no warranty and has been describe as best to my knowledge. With just a little TLC it can be brought back to very nice condition or driven as is for cheep fun transpiration. This one is good for another 100,000 miles on the timing belt and water pump. Being an interference engine this should be a good selling point as it is a very labor intense job to replace them due to the compact work space. Payments in full via Paypal within 48 hours of accepted offer is preferred. Shipping costs and arrangements are solely the responsibility of the buyer. You are more than welcome to make an appointment to take it for a test drive. I am still using it as a daily driver. By the way theses seats are the most comfortable seats ever made for the PT cruisers both front and back are extremely comfortable for a compact car. I will post some more pics shortly. |
Chrysler Cirrus for Sale
2009 touring used 3.8l v6 12v automatic fwd minivan/van premium(US $14,980.00)
2001 t/c limited ~1 owner ~ power doors/hatch~69k low miles~beauty~warranty(US $7,995.00)
Chrysler 200 touring 4 door sedan, one owner, no reserve, low miles, autocheck!
1962 chrysler newport rat rod lowrider(US $1,800.00)
Low miles htd pwr seats nav beats dr.dre sunroof sport remote start bu cam crs(US $27,981.00)
2006 chrysler 300 c srt8 sedan 4-door 6.1l(US $23,000.00)
Auto Services in New York
Zafuto Automotive Service Inc ★★★★★
X-Treme Auto Glass ★★★★★
Willow Tree Auto Repair ★★★★★
Willis Motors ★★★★★
Wicks Automotive Inc ★★★★★
Whalen Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Fiat Chrysler’s Sergio Marchionne throws more cold water on Tesla, EVs
Tue, Oct 10 2017Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne has once again sounded off on industry upstart Tesla and its wunderkind boss, Elon Musk. In the process, he doubled down on FCA's reluctance to follow its competitors headlong into electrifying its vehicle fleet, saying "we're not betting the bank on going fully electric in the next decade. It won't happen." Marchionne made his comments on Monday during remarks at the New York Stock Exchange, where he was marking the 70th anniversary of Ferrari. They come as Tesla struggles to ramp up production of its Model 3 sedan, its first mass-market offering, and the company continues to hemorrhage money. Here's what he said: "We still don't have a viable model for delivering an electric car. As much as I like Elon Musk, and he's a good friend, and actually he's done a phenomenal job of marketing Telsa, I remain unconvinced of a new economic viability of the model that he's pitching. So I think we need to be careful, because when we embrace electrification, and I made comments on the fact that we lose money on every Fiat 500, the electric that we sell in the U.S. Now that's reflective of the 2011-2010 costs in terms of components. Those costs have come down. If I were to do it again, I would certainly reduce the amount of the loss, but I would not make any money. And you can't run economic entities on losses. It doesn't happen. "So how do we find a convergence of technology bringing prices of components down and allows us to price accordingly — or we need to navigate through this process in a combined way between combustion and electrification to yield at least a minimum of economic returns that allows for our continuity? The last thing you want is me to be successful selling cars for 24 months and then go bust. That's not a good story. Especially in a place like this which rewards economic success. Let's not sit here and design our own future in the tank. Let's try and do it properly. We will do all the right things. We are investing without making a lot of noise on electrification. We will combine it with combustion to yield the right level of CO2. But we're not betting the bank on going fully electric in the next decade. It won't happen." It's not the first time Marchionne has publicly expressed doubts about Tesla's business plan.
Major automakers urge Trump not to freeze fuel economy targets
Mon, May 7 2018WASHINGTON — Major automakers are telling the Trump administration they want to reach an agreement with California to avoid a legal battle over fuel efficiency standards, and they support continued increases in mileage standards through 2025. "We support standards that increase year over year that also are consistent with marketplace realities," Mitch Bainwol, chief executive of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing major automakers, will tell a U.S. House of Representatives panel on Tuesday, according to written testimony released on Monday. The Trump administration is weighing how to revise fuel economy standards through at least the 2025 model year, and one option is to propose freezing the standards through 2026, effectively allowing automakers to delay investments in technology to cut greenhouse gas emissions from burning petroleum. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has not formally submitted its joint proposal with the Environmental Protection Agency to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review. Even so, last week, California and 16 other states sued to challenge the Trump administration's decision to revise U.S. vehicle rules. Auto industry executives have held meetings with the Trump administration for months and have urged the administration to try to reach a deal with California even as they support slowing the pace of reduction in carbon dioxide emissions that the Obama administration rules outlined. One automaker official said part of the message to President Donald Trump at a meeting on Friday will be to consider California like a foreign trade deal that needs to be renegotiated. Automakers want to urge him to get automakers a "better deal" — as opposed to potentially years of litigation between major states and federal regulators. On Friday, Trump is set to meet with the chief executives of General Motors, Ford, Fiat Chrysler and the top U.S. executives of at least five other major automakers, including Toyota, Volkswagen AG and Daimler AG, to talk about revisions to the vehicle rules. Senior EPA and Transportation Department officials will also attend. Environmental groups are eager to keep the rules in place, saying they will save consumers billions in fuel costs. A coalition of groups plans to stage a protest outside Ford's headquarters in Michigan.
Court ruling to delay Fiat's Chrysler buyout?
Thu, 01 Aug 2013We've already reported on the attempts of Fiat to purchase the remaining 41.5-percent stake in Chrysler, currently owned by the United Auto Workers' VEBA healthcare trust. And while the issues still aren't resolved, Fiat has received both a bit of good news and a bit of bad news from a Delaware judge.
The good news is that the court ruled in favor on two key arguments of Fiat's, relating to what is a fair price for the Chrysler shares. The rulings essentially slash half a billion dollars off the price of the 54,000 shares owned by VEBA, according to a report from Reuters.
The bad news is that this makes the UAW an even more difficult opponent in negotiations. Its VEBA fund is meant to cover ever escalating retiree healthcare costs, so naturally, the UAW wants to get as much money as possible. Losing a big chunk of cash isn't likely to make the union more cooperative.











