Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1994 Chrysler Lhs Car For Sale Great Value As A Transportation Car For Your Work on 2040-cars

US $900.00
Year:1994 Mileage:100000
Location:

CAR IS IN FLORIDA, FORT LAUDERDALE AREA

============================================================

WHERE DO I BEGIN. OKAY.

This is the history of this car:

1. The car belonged to my brother. He passed away in November 2012.

2.  Because I knew he had put over $2,000 into the mechanics of the car, I bought the car from the estate.I felt that although it was 20 years old, my brother put a lot of money into it.

3.  After I bought the car in March, I had it professionally detailed inside, and paid $200 for a new headliner including visors and $60 for new hydraulics for the hood, so the hood stays up.  Also the wiper blades are new.  A total of $400

4.   The trunk is clean and all the lining is tight, perfectly in place as originally.

5. The trunk lining looks like new. (just slightly soiled)

6. The carpet inside and the back seat and passenger seat look relatively new.

7. Regarding the upholstery, just the drivers seatneeds repair.

8. The tires are in good condition and will be good for a while.

9. After driving one block, all the doors do automatically lock.

10. The outside lights work, all the signals work.

11. The driver power window switch works all windows to put them down, but you need to use the switches on the passenger side to get them back up.

12.I brought the car to a mechanic to disconnect the alarmand to see the reason the seats don't move back and forth easily. I don't know what he did, but after he did whatever he did under the seat, suddenly, many things that were working perfectly now don't work.

13.Ice cold a/c, Gas gauge, power door-lock switch, power mirrors, radio, wipers, were all working perfectly and now they are not.

14. I brought it to 2 auto electric businesses and was told that I need a body computer or module. Apparently that part affects all these items, although one of the businesses said it does not affect the gas gauge. Being that all these items stopped working at the very same time, I think that the body computer works the gas gauge too. It is too coincidental.

15. It needs a paint job, seriously.

16. Some Bondo patch is needed at the left rear bumper, and there are break-away holes where the fenders meet the hood near the windshield.

So, what do we have here. A really pleasant looking interior, that looks almost new. All necessary items work for the car to function except the windshield wipers.

If you need wheels to get back and forth, this car should serve you very well for the price. Remember, when you can do better for yourself, you can always sell it, and at least get $500 from a junk yard.

17. The car had low milage for a car 20 years old, (you can tell by the carpet and upholstery other than one edge of the driver's seat).Unfortunately, the odometer broke, so it cannot be verified. However it was owned by a senior citizen rarely driving at age 78, and not well, since 2004.

So, to sum up; mechanically under the hood over $2000 was spent. Then we put in about $400, since March 2013.    No problem with the engine. The car runs good. Normally for this price you get a real piece of junk.   This car is NOT.  This is a really good car.  It just needs a little help.  Uh-oh.  Just brought it in for new brakes.  Couldn't get one of the lug nuts off.   So brakes have not been checked.  Mechanic leaned on the car and an additional piece on the right front fender broke away.  (I have the piece.)  Mechanic said it needs a new rack and pinion.  You wouldn't know it, because it drives perfectly well with no problems at all, and I did not get a second opinion. I lowered the price down because of this rack and pinion needing repair in the future.  The car should last you quite a while as is.  </strong></p>

Chrysler 200 Series for Sale

Auto blog

Dodge Viper saved from crusher by students, but will it last?

Tue, 16 Sep 2014

The saga of the Washington state community college hoping to keep its allegedly pre-production Dodge Viper out of the maw of the crusher is going strong. Not only does the school still have the car, but there's a chance that the college might even get to keep it.
The whole situation flared up in March when the South Puget Sound Community College in Olympia, WA, received a notice from Chrysler Group that requested that the school's Viper be destroyed. The automaker had loaned the muscle car to it about a decade ago to use for educational purposes in its auto tech classes. With the Dodge growing long in the tooth, "it is unlikely that these vehicles offer any educational value to students," the company said in its press release on the matter.
However, the college balked at destroying its Viper, despite the fact it had signed a contract with Chrysler Group to do so. The school further claimed that its car was incredibly special because it was a pre-production example and just the fourth one made back in 1992. Although, as we pointed out at the time, the photos of the school's vehicle showed a coupe that looked like a newer Viper GTS.

Fiat Chrysler CEO says final merger talks with Peugeot going well

Thu, Jan 23 2020

BRUSSELS — Fiat Chrysler's chief executive Michael Manley said on Wednesday that merger talks with Peugeot owner PSA  to create the world's No. 4 carmaker are progressing well and he hopes to have a deal within 12-14 months. Speaking to Reuters on the sidelines of an industry meeting, he said he doesn't expect any major obstacles that could delay a final agreement. "Talks are progressing really well," Manley said about negotiations with the French carmaker ahead of a briefing by the European automotive association (ACEA), of which he is president. His comments come a month after the two carmakers agreed to a binding deal worth about $50 billion to combine forces in response to a slowdown in global demand and mounting costs of making cleaner vehicles amid tighter emissions regulations. Manley's timeline for completing the deal by early 2021 is in line with a forecast made by the companies in December. Fiat and Peugeot are now getting into the details of how the merger will work, including choosing which vehicle platforms — the technological underpinnings of a vehicle — will fit which products in a combined company. Because customers in different locations still prefer vastly different cars, there is room for multiple platforms in a combined group, Manley said. "That global platform is an elusive beast," he added. "This concept of a massive global platform in my mind is almost a myth, but that doesnÂ’t mean to say weÂ’re not going to recruit significant volume." Related Video:    

Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move

Tue, Dec 6 2016

With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.