Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Ltz H/d on 2040-cars

US $31,890.00
Year:2008 Mileage:114180 Color: White /
 Ebony
Location:

1308 Sw A St, Bentonville, Arkansas, United States

1308 Sw A St, Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:6.6L V8 32V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GCHK23678F207177
Stock Num: 207177
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500 LTZ H/D
Year: 2008
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Ebony
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio system security
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary engine cooler
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Chrome bumpers
  • Chrome grille
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Daytime running lights
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 41.3"
  • Front Hip Room: 62.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.3"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.2"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Gross vehicle weight: 9,200 lbs.
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • MP3 player
  • OnStar Safe & Sound
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Overhead console: Mini
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.6"
  • Rear Hip Room: 65.5"
  • Rear Leg Room: 39.0"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.2"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatback storage: 2
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Split rear bench
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: HD
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System: Tire specific
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Torsion bar front spring
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • XM Satellite Radio
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 114180

Auto Services in Arkansas

Weber Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5961 Commerce Ct, Little-Rock-Air-Force-Base
Phone: (501) 835-8582

Riverdale Automotive Ltd ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 941 Locust St, Enola
Phone: (501) 205-8622

Pro Care Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 5800 E Highland Dr, Jonesboro
Phone: (870) 275-6253

Mustard Seed Mobile Auto Repair & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: 2116 Westport Loop, Bigelow
Phone: (501) 301-4878

Larry`s Mobile ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 307 E Highway 64, Hartman
Phone: (479) 497-9007

Larry Hice Custom & Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 62 N Brooklyn Rd, Ratcliff
Phone: (479) 847-5446

Auto blog

2015 Chevrolet Trax

Thu, Dec 4 2014

After the obligatory product presentation for the 2015 Trax, I caught up with Steve Majoros, Chevrolet's director of marketing for crossovers and cars, and asked him to elaborate on which markets his planners believe will be the hot starters for this tiny CUV. Without much hesitation, Majoros began to click off traditional sales havens for Subaru, namely, New England and the snowy bits of the East Coast, Colorado and the Pacific Northwest. That news might not surprise you, but it did me. Perhaps it's something as basic as the Trax's tall-hatchback looks, or the emphasis Chevrolet put on the urban driving cycle during my test in San Diego. But before my chat with Majoros, I'd considered this a crossover pointed at the Millennial city mouse more than his bumpkin cousin. But a closer look had me re-examining the granola cred of Chevy's smallest crossover. Having spent my fair share of time in New England and around New Englanders, I started by mentally listing the Trax's Subaru-like traits: practicality, thrift, all-weather ability and, well, just a dash of ugliness. (I suppose a hatchback needn't always be ugly to sell in Maine, or Boulder or Portland... but a 'distinctive' face doesn't seem to hurt.) After a day of driving through sunny San Diego and its surroundings, I can say that Trax makes an interesting case for itself against the standard bearers of the L.L. Bean set, but I'm less sure of its argument for young urbanites. The Trax looks a lot like an Equinox whose suit shrunk in the wash. Chevy's has downsized its own, rather conservative crossover styling to fit the proportions of the subcompact Trax; to my eyes, it looks a lot like an Equinox whose suit shrunk in the wash. That's fine for offering a cohesive look for the Chevy family of crossovers, but it seems out of step with the rest of the segment. If the Trax's current competitive set were the cast of a high school-based TV show, the Kia Soul would play the lovable nerd, the Nissan Juke perhaps the outsider musician and the Subaru XV Crosstrek the athletic outdoorsy kid. Chevy may see the Trax as the hipster chick wearing intentionally ironic mom jeans, but to me the styling is a little too on the nose; more like an actual grownup trying to hang with the kids. These mom jeans are genuine. Per my earlier point, that quasi-conservative look may be just fast enough for staid New Englanders, but I have a hard time seeing the bluff, big-Bowtied front end playing in Bushwick or Wicker Park.

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd