Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 on 2040-cars

US $30,135.00
Year:2014 Mileage:5 Color: Summit White /
 Jet Black
Location:

1122 4th Ave, Conway, South Carolina, United States

1122 4th Ave, Conway, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.3L V6 12V GDI OHV
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GCNCPEH9EZ304323
Stock Num: 7993
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Summit White
Interior Color: Jet Black
Options:
  • 1st row curtain head airbags
  • 2 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary engine cooler
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Daytime running lights
  • Diameter of tires: 17.0"
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 41.3"
  • Front Hip Room: 66.0"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.3"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 61.2"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Overall Width: 80.0"
  • Overhead console: Mini
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Passenger vanity mirrors
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Suspension class: HD
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System: Tire specific
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 70
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 255 mm
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Trip computer
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Vinyl floor covering
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 8
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 5

Auto Services in South Carolina

West Specialty Products Used Cars ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Financing Services
Address: 1230 Gentry Memorial Hwy, Pickens
Phone: (864) 442-0410

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 9909 Charlotte Hwy, Catawba
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Star Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 3102 N Pleasantburg Dr, Greenville
Phone: (864) 846-9524

Stack`s Wholesale Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Auto Body Parts
Address: 7307 Charleston Hwy, Bowman
Phone: (803) 829-3488

Scott`s Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 931 Central Ave, Summerville
Phone: (843) 875-1708

Reid`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Repossessing Service
Address: 10117 John Price Rd, Lake-Wylie
Phone: (704) 208-9192

Auto blog

Ford Police Interceptors dominate Michigan State Police testing

Tue, Nov 1 2016

Once again, Ford Motor Company builds the fastest police vehicles. The Blue Oval touted the news in an official release following Michigan State Police and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department testing. Ford did very well. Except for one acceleration metric – zero to 10 miles per hour – the Blue Oval's Taurus and Explorer-based cop cars were the quickest, with particular praise coming for the EcoBoost-powered models, which bested Chevrolet and Dodge's V8-powered variants. Dearborn's products also posted the fastest average times around MSP's vehicle dynamics course. But it wasn't all positive for Ford. The only four-cylinder in the contest, the 2.0-liter, EcoBoost Ford SSP Sedan, had both the lowest top speed, 120 mph, and the slowest acceleration figures. It was also the slowest in track testing. Ford's products also failed to match the braking and top speeds of its rivals from Detroit and Auburn Hills – the rear-drive Charger Pursuit posted the best braking stats of the entire test, while the V8-powered Chevrolet Caprice hit the highest top speed, at 155 mph. Ford did score a top speed award, among SUVs, but at 132 mph, the naturally aspirated Police Interceptor Utility had to share its award with the equally fast, rear-drive Chevrolet Tahoe. The LA County Sheriff's timing isn't publicly available, but according to Ford, the EcoBoost-powered police cars put on a similarly impressive show for cops on the West Coast. We've assembled a spreadsheet on Google Docs that offers an easy to browse comparison of the different stats assembled by the Michigan State Police, and divided the vehicles between standard V6-powered sedans, high-performance sedans (EcoBoost and V8 models), and SUVs. You can check it out here. Related Video:

2020 Ford Escape hybrids vs other crossover fuel sippers: How they compare on paper

Wed, Apr 3 2019

Along with a new generation of Escape, Ford also reintroduced the world to the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid. And if that weren't enough, Ford is adding a plug-in hybrid version. This is a sign of the times: people are more crossover crazy than ever, but are also seeking ways to use less fuel, whether it's for environmental or purely money-motivated reasons. The Ford hybrids aren't the only fuel-efficient compact crossovers on the market. They will be going head-to-head with conventional hybrids including the 2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. There are other plug-in hybrids including the 2019 Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the plug-in version of the 2019 Kia Niro. There are even a couple diesels in the form of the 2019 Chevy Equinox and 2019 GMC Terrain. So we've rounded up the details on all these crossovers to see who leads and lags in criteria such as power, fuel efficiency, space and price. Check out all their details below. 2019 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid View 68 Photos How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Conventional Hybrids and Diesels Let's face it, if you're buying one of these crossovers, one of the things that matters most to you is just how frugal with fuel they are. We'll start off with the conventional hybrids and diesels, and the clear victor is the Kia Niro, which in base FE trim, manages to hit 50 mpg combined. This is thanks to it sharing its powertrain with the Hyundai Ioniq, the Hyundai equivalent of the Toyota Prius. Buyers should take note that only the FE returns such high fuel economy. The LX and EX drop to 49 mpg, and the S Touring and Touring get 43. Even then, the least efficient Niro is the most efficient of the normal hybrids and diesels. It is nearly the least powerful, though, with 139 horsepower. Just behind it is the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. It delivers 40 mpg combined, and it has an ace up its sleeve: it comes standard with all-wheel drive. Every other vehicle in this powertrain group has front drive standard, and the Niro isn't available with all-wheel drive at all. If that weren't enough, the RAV4 Hybrid also boasts the most power at 219 horses. While we can't say anything about Escape Hybrid fuel economy, we do know that it will make 198 horsepower, which is close to the class-leading RAV4. The least powerful of these is the Equinox and Terrain, and they return the worst fuel economy at 32 mpg.

Buick takes top spot in 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study

Tue, Jun 28 2022

People, economies, and supply chains weren't the only things continuing to get sick over the past year. The 2022 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) is out, showing the average rate of problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) during the first 90 days of ownership increased overall. The average figure for the 32 ranked manufacturers in 2020 was about 166 problems per 100 vehicles. In the 2021 IQS, that dropped to an average of 162. This year, the average jumps to 180 problems. J.D. Power says that figure is a record high over the 36-year history of the study. Buick leapt to the top of the rankings this year with the fewest issues, at 139 problems per 100 vehicles in the first 100 days of ownership. After Dodge became the first American automaker to lead the IQS in 2020, followed by Ram in 2021, this year marks a three-peat for U.S. carmakers. Dodge took second this year at 143 PP100, Chevrolet third with 147 PP100, Genesis the first luxury maker on the chart in fourth with 156 PP100. Between February and May, this year's study gathered responses to 223 questions from more than 84,000 new 2022-model-year car owners and lessees. The questions are designed to zero in on real-world problems new owners encounter with nine categories of vehicle features: Infotainment; features, controls and displays; exterior; driving assistance; interior; powertrain; seats; driving experience; and climate. As has been the case in the past few year, infotainment has proved to be the most problematic bugbear making scores worse. Considering features individually, six of 10 of the worst problem areas dealt with infotainment, causing infotainment's score of 45 PP100 to be 19.5 PP100 worse than the second-placed feature. Consumers ranked getting Android Auto and Apple CarPlay to connect reliably as the most troublesome.  GM didn't just score with Buick, which was one of only nine of the 33 ranked brands to show improvement this year. The conglomerate earned first place with the fewest PP100 among all the automaker groups, and scored the most model-level awards with nine, ahead of BMW with eight and Hyundai Group with three.  This year's study again showed a gap between luxury and mass-market makers, thought to be down to the amount of tech in luxury vehicles that consumers aren't properly informed about or that doesn't act as expected — that latter issue exacerbated by the chip shortage.