2012 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Lt on 2040-cars
2800 Alma Hwy, Van Buren, Arkansas, United States
Engine:5.3L V8 16V MPFI OHV Flexible Fuel
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3GCPKSE73CG101267
Stock Num: 14135A
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 1500 LT
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Victory Red
Interior Color: Ebony
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 32654
This GM Certified 2012 Silverado LT is 4WD. The previous owner purchased it brand new from us at Rhodes Chevrolet! Rest assured with this purchase. It has been given the seal of approval by our Service Department. Do you need a tow hitch for those fishing trips, mountain excursions, lake fiestas, & sea stories? Jackpot! This baby is gripped & equipped. Need peace of mind? No worries with this purchase, it includes a CarFax Title History report. Come by today to see this one in person. Here at Rhodes Chevrolet we appreciate every opportunity to earn your business and we will prove it to you. With over 75 years of history behind us, you will see why we say: Rhodes Chevrolet "Since 1934...Your Lifetime Chevy Dealer!"
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for Sale
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $29,125.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $29,125.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 work truck(US $32,160.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 lt(US $36,020.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 lt(US $36,565.00)
- 2014 chevrolet silverado 1500 lt(US $40,639.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Young Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Tidal Wave USA ★★★★★
Skidz Jeep & 4x4 ★★★★★
River Country Chevrolet ★★★★★
Rick`s Exhaust & Auto ★★★★★
Parker Automotive Restoration ★★★★★
Auto blog
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #316 LIVE!
Mon, 14 Jan 2013We record Autoblog Podcast #316 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #316
2013 Detroit Auto Show
China's rise, global restructuring wither GM's Korea division
Wed, Jan 7 2015An article in the Daily Kanban suggests the sun is setting on GM Korea, and it could already be well into dusk. GM Korea came about when General Motors, along with co-investors SAIC and Suzuki, bought Daewoo Motors from parent company Daewoo Group in 2001; it had a previous tie-up with GM, a joint venture that ended in 1992, although Daewoo cars were based on GM cars until 1996. Over the decade following the purchase, it became such an important part of operations that it was renamed GM Korea in 2011, "to reflect its heightened status in [the] global operations of GM." Just two years later, the printed rumors were that the subsidiary responsible for a fifth of Chevrolet's global production could be shutting down. The division's sales were down almost 21 percent through November of last year, counting domestic South Korean sales, exports, and CKD – Complete Knock Down – products. That makes the labor strife, already an issue for four years, even more acute, reports say the subsidiary will lose $36 million a year if it can't get the job and wage cuts it wants, and government concessions can't make up for the losses. And it gets worse, so head over to Daily Kanban to read the rest of the story.